Mafiascum.net

Nero, please refrain from personal attacks.

Where exactly was the bullying.. nero showing up?

This is below you wisdom. You rep out, stay out.

Ah wait the no skill thing sorry..

I still stand by my 2nd line.

i dont rep out of games bu

ill just ignore nero

Dave where you at with regards to the current wagons?

In post 1609, Gamma Emerald wrote:Could someone more familiar with DGB meta talk to me about that

I don't know about others, but for me it's not a meta thing at all. My vote started out RVS and then stayed when she posted a few times but avoided doing anything real.
I haven't really agreed with any of the other wagons, so it's more inertia than anything else.

Actually, I looked at Chickadee and while I'm not sure why others are voting there, I see something that I don't like.
She has posted a lot about Creature but has apparently not paid any attention to the other goings on in the thread.
Granted she's posting about being sick and I never shade when people have RL issues. Not posting could be overlooked for that, but the narrow focus less so.

VOTE: Chickadee

In post 1561, Wisdom wrote:your whole 1544 felt like you had the need to discredit me

If you seriously think 'not joking enough' is a valid scumcase considering my presence in the thread then I agree that I'm discrediting you.
If you were spewing emptiness for reactions in advancing that case - then you shouldn't be surprised the reaction is negative.
I don't see the fire.
Am I missing something?

how do you feel about a chickadee vote?

In post 1591, hebichan wrote:Honestly this is starting to get pretty egregiously bad. HE's setting up a bunch of leading questions to shade wisdom for no real benefit here.

I'm not askign any leading questions.
I *AM* setting up a situation that shows Wisdom is being silly.
Why is that shading if it's true?
And if it's not true - how is what I'm saying not true?

In post 1603, CheekyTeeky wrote:I wouldn't mind a Thor wagon either if some momentum started happening there. I can't really explain my read as it's mainly just a gut feeling that he's playing strangely and doing the bare minimum.

I'm blatantly doing the bare minimum.
Why do you just 'feel' like I am? It's pretty obvious I'm barely posting.

In post 1609, Gamma Emerald wrote:Could someone more familiar with DGB meta talk to me about that

About what?

In post 1660, Wisdom wrote:how do you feel about a chickadee vote?

I don't townread the slot. But neither am I entranced by the wagon.
I'd ask you to explain a case why I should move, but then this wonderful conversation would hit a brick wall, yeah?

correct
but you can find others' reasons for votes there

If they want to try to sell me I suppose they can.
Good conversation?

In post 1657, davesaz wrote:

In post 1609, Gamma Emerald wrote:Could someone more familiar with DGB meta talk to me about that

I don't know about others, but for me it's not a meta thing at all. My vote started out RVS and then stayed when she posted a few times but avoided doing anything real.
I haven't really agreed with any of the other wagons, so it's more inertia than anything else.

I didn’t ask for a voter, I just wanted one with experience with DGB

In post 1663, Thor665 wrote:

In post 1609, Gamma Emerald wrote:Could someone more familiar with DGB meta talk to me about that

About what?

Whether this resembles his town or scum meta and how

DGB is a lot like me in that I don't think she has a scum/town meta that is appreciably different from each other. It's kind of the point.
Read the play over time or lynch her early to remove the variable is my advice.

i agree with that approach but i favor just leaving her alone for now

In post 1604, BuJaber wrote:Explain the vote cheeky

Why are you concerned with my vote in particular?

In post 1611, Nero Cain wrote:Chick wagon is equally bad.

In post 1604, BuJaber wrote:Explain the vote cheeky

She's just scum, man.

In post 1612, Nero Cain wrote:

vote: CheekyTeeky

I'd omgus the shizz out of you if Majiffy's replace out hadn't happened. So why vote before you've even read the game? Why am I scum?

In post 1662, Thor665 wrote:

In post 1603, CheekyTeeky wrote:I wouldn't mind a Thor wagon either if some momentum started happening there. I can't really explain my read as it's mainly just a gut feeling that he's playing strangely and doing the bare minimum.

I'm blatantly doing the bare minimum.
Why do you just 'feel' like I am? It's pretty obvious I'm barely posting.

This is blatantly nitpicking my choice of words I often phrase things as "I feel" which makes sense when I'm trying express a gut read Im trying to elaborate on. Why are you doing the bare minimum?

Because I'm currently on a job working really long hours.
Why do you find me doing the bare minimum scum indicative?
I'll ignore you complaining about me nitpicking at your statement since apparently you don't like being scumhunted

In post 1671, CheekyTeeky wrote:Why are you concerned with my vote in particular?

You didn't accompany it with a reason.

In post 1669, Thor665 wrote:DGB is a lot like me in that I don't think she has a scum/town meta that is appreciably different from each other. It's kind of the point.
Read the play over time or lynch her early to remove the variable is my advice.

Ech
I’ve seen DGB play once as each alignment and in the Town game he was quite engaged and in the scum game it was the opposite so I’m feeling like the low engagement is scummy