Mafiascum.net

In post 1644, Auro wrote:

In post 1629, rb wrote:what i think are 4 separate town wagons is opportunistic

Which 4?

@rb

In post 1630, rb wrote:Egix who are your scumreads

you need to have a vote in play, this is beyond fucking ridiculous that four people are not voting

if you are town, put your vote in play even if it's just random idc

every vote you put down dilutes overall scum influence on voting and we are FAST heading towards a repeat of day1. considering the low activity of the game we need to consolidate on who we want lynched sooner rather than later

Let me put it this way:
My current towncore is Lamees+Creature+Auro
Anyone outside that is fair game, but WRT the current wagons I'm gonna go here:

VOTE: Mala



Even if she flips town, we'll have a good idea of where to go next.

sigh, whatever

enjoy losing i guess?

In post 1651, Egix96 wrote:My current towncore is Lamees+Creature+Auro

How are you TR-ing me this much when you've only played versus scum!me and misread me both times?
I'd expect town!Egix to be paranoid of me if not scumreading me.

@rb: Which 4 wagons was I opportunistically on?

If we consolidate on Mala/Thor right now we're probably going to end up giving hammer to the replacements.

In post 1653, Auro wrote:

In post 1651, Egix96 wrote:My current towncore is Lamees+Creature+Auro

How are you TR-ing me this much when you've only played versus scum!me and misread me both times?
I'd expect town!Egix to be paranoid of me if not scumreading me.

Don't worry about it.

Also, I think you're forgetting about Lovers and Losers

That's a pretty towny response anyway IMO

I know this is shitty but vla due to flu =_=

It’s okay if you lynch me

I already posted my reads they really haven’t changed much

In post 1651, Egix96 wrote:

In post 1630, rb wrote:Egix who are your scumreads

you need to have a vote in play, this is beyond fucking ridiculous that four people are not voting

if you are town, put your vote in play even if it's just random idc

every vote you put down dilutes overall scum influence on voting and we are FAST heading towards a repeat of day1. considering the low activity of the game we need to consolidate on who we want lynched sooner rather than later

Let me put it this way:
My current towncore is Lamees+Creature+Auro
Anyone outside that is fair game, but WRT the current wagons I'm gonna go here:

VOTE: Mala

L-2

Even if she flips town, we'll have a good idea of where to go next.

But do you now. Where would you go next when I flip town

In post 1658, Malakitty wrote:

In post 1651, Egix96 wrote:

In post 1630, rb wrote:Egix who are your scumreads

you need to have a vote in play, this is beyond fucking ridiculous that four people are not voting

if you are town, put your vote in play even if it's just random idc

every vote you put down dilutes overall scum influence on voting and we are FAST heading towards a repeat of day1. considering the low activity of the game we need to consolidate on who we want lynched sooner rather than later

Let me put it this way:
My current towncore is Lamees+Creature+Auro
Anyone outside that is fair game, but WRT the current wagons I'm gonna go here:

VOTE: Mala

L-2

Even if she flips town, we'll have a good idea of where to go next.

But do you now. Where would you go next when I flip town

Thor/rb/DLA

In post 1655, Egix96 wrote:Don't worry about it.

Also, I think you're forgetting about Lovers and Losers

I'm sorry but this is kinda pinging me still, I want to evaluate how genuine your own thought process on arriving at my townread is, here.

Also yeah I wanted to forget that game you did make a subtle pocketing attempt there tho come to think of it, so please do explain.

In post 1659, Egix96 wrote:Thor/rb/DLA

Thor I can understand, though I'm kinda towning him now.
DLA I've been uncertain about, but sure, since she's also on the wagon.

Why rb? If Mala's red it directly implicates rb, so this means regardless of Mala's alignment you believe rb is potential scum, right?

In that case, why weren't you voting him when he was being wagoned? I just checked back and your vote was on DLA; however I pointed out that it doesn't seem like scum would push a claimed PR like that and you acknowledged that. Walk me through this?

So you're going knowingly lynch someone that has the flu. You guys are heartless.

the only thing that actually matters is her alignment

i think shes town but if i thought she was scum id vote her regardless of having the flu or not? i dont see how that factors in at all

however, it does seem ultra sketchy that someone with actual good reasons to be low activity, who's been fine when actually active means i want to lynch the people who want to lynch mala more than anything else really

In post 1650, Auro wrote:

In post 1644, Auro wrote:

In post 1629, rb wrote:what i think are 4 separate town wagons is opportunistic

Which 4?

@rb

@rb

In post 1665, MiniDeathStar wrote:and end the day.

Kinda unfair.

Super fair. Due to the inactive players we can't even get the right number for a lynch so mod kill and end is better than ending the day with no lynch.

VOTE: Creature
He got a prod.

In post 1668, Nako wrote:VOTE: Creature
He got a prod.

because nothing is happening at all

In post 1660, Auro wrote:

In post 1655, Egix96 wrote:Don't worry about it.

Also, I think you're forgetting about Lovers and Losers

I'm sorry but this is kinda pinging me still, I want to evaluate how genuine your own thought process on arriving at my townread is, here.

Also yeah I wanted to forget that game you did make a subtle pocketing attempt there tho come to think of it, so please do explain.

If you remember that readslist I made a while back, you'll know I said before that you seemed towny to me but could be deepwolfing.
Since then, I've been getting more townvibes from you.
Me putting you in my towncore does not mean I'm 100% locking it in that you're town, because if this game ends up gong to LyLo (let's be honest here, it likely will) then I will reevaluate you if you're still alive. Same goes for anyone else that I'm currently townreading.

@Second bit, it's okay, I think that game was pretty forgettable anyway
Not sure what you mean by saying I made a "subtle pocketing attempt" though. Was it when I said "Michael makes good points" or...?

In post 1661, Auro wrote:Why rb? If Mala's red it directly implicates rb, so this means regardless of Mala's alignment you believe rb is potential scum, right?

In that case, why weren't you voting him when he was being wagoned? I just checked back and your vote was on DLA; however I pointed out that it doesn't seem like scum would push a claimed PR like that and you acknowledged that. Walk me through this?

rb is someone I've been unsure about for quite a large part of this game so far. Sometimes I think they're town, other times I think they're scum.
I don't think that I can clear anyone if Mala flips town tbh.

As for why I didn't vote rb when you say I had the chance... I dunno really, maybe I just thought he was town at that moment? I don't remember.

In post 1668, Nako wrote:VOTE: Creature
He got a prod.

Weird vote. The prod was for everyone. Even I got a prod and I was one of the two or three players who wasn't in the requirements of getting prodded.

Creatures defence is interesting though. Could be scum, but for now

VOTE: nako

In post 1668, Nako wrote:VOTE: Creature
He got a prod.

You got two. Why shouldn't we lynch you?

Just realized that both vacant slots have V/LA's listed that are ending soon.



Hopefully then the game can pick up again.