Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2019 6:16 pm
I hear the scumminess really amplifies the more questionmarks there are at the end of a question
Well, part of that is that I pretty frequently misspell his damn name. The other part is that in my stream of consciousness in 1422 I made heavy use of theIn post 1637, EspressoPatronum wrote:Can you spell out how you got such a strong TR on ofrhz? I tried looking for the answer, but a Ctrl+F of ofrhz in your ISO yields two results.In post 1635, Pine wrote:My ofhrz TR is pretty strong.In post 1633, Klick wrote:On the contrary, I'm surprised by how little attention ofhrz has received all day up until this point. Even now there's an alarming amount of fighting this wagon with hardly anyone expressing a townread on him.In post 1622, Menalque wrote:I really don’t like how hard the push has been to divert away from gamma towards ofhrz/chemist (clearly increasingly ofhrz)
Answer my question before asking your own.In post 1648, ofrhz wrote:Why would you say that my vote on Gamma is demotivating and infuriating when I said that I looked at Cinnamon's games and came to the conclusion that he is not playing his usual town game here?In post 1646, Pink Ball wrote:I've never played with Cinnamon before and I don't do meta stuff. So the whole Cinnamon scumreads where because of meta? I don't remember that being the case.In post 1639, ofrhz wrote:? Do you disagree that Cinnamon has been playing differently from their past town games?In post 1474, Pink Ball wrote:I want to agree with you Pine, but I've tried to derail Gamma's wagon for a while now and even after your big cool post there seems to be no change at all. ofrhz's vote on Gamma is demotivating at best and infuriating at worst
The summary of that towncase is that he was taking the correct stances, not that he was having correct townreads.In post 1647, ofrhz wrote:The summary of this towncase on Cinnamon is that he had a few correct townreads (which isn't hard to fake because scum know who is town and who is not) and because of a consistent vote, which PB was also townreading me earlier forIn post 1555, Pink Ball wrote:We know DP is town, so here, Cinnamon took an early stance onto defending a player who was, at that time, being one of the first pushes in the game. This defense and stance looks good in retrospective thanks to new info we got.In post 183, Cinnamon wrote:I agree with DP here Klick's push seems to be pretty bad. I don't think their reasons for pushing Pikachu are good at all.Again, we know Tim is town, so another good post in retrospective, and his logic makes sense from a town PoV: "I don't like the way you're trying to derail the attention on you by calling out a lurker".In post 188, Cinnamon wrote:I have a bit of an EP scumread here. Their response to 67 and not 68 kind of suggests that they're trying to get Tim on their side, or at least take the spotlight off them. While it's not scum indicative to push on lurkers it's an easy way to generate a read as scum and it also helps bring attention to other players when he's getting pushed.Again, Tim is town, and I'm townreading Creature.In post 189, Cinnamon wrote:I like creature and Tim rn.Consistent vote.
And having looked at Cinnamon's games, I think that Cinnamon is more aggressive as town and is actually more likely to engage in direct questioning with someone who is broadcasting a scumread on himAnd here and on he starts engaging with EP because of EP's scumread on him. Two things to say about this: one, is that I agree 100% with Cinnamon, the push from EP felt unfounded and if I were Cinnamon, I would've been frustrated with that push too; and two, is that if Cinnamon was scum, I think his reaction would've been different. Instead of answering with frustration everything EP said, I think he would've tried to engage with other players or at least try to look more comprehensive about EP's push on him, but that wasn't the case. He got in a 1v1 and he couldn't get out.In post 224, Cinnamon wrote:This is the sort of 'I'm pushing on you for lurking' without actually asking about the things that I've said that make me feel a bit uneasy about you since this type of push would be easy to do as scum.
I'm VERY emotional right now after watching Stranger Things, you don't want to push my buttons PikachuIn post 1650, Detective Pikachu wrote:I hear the scumminess really amplifies the more questionmarks there are at the end of a question
I have been relatively absent sitewide. This isn't hard to check. I don't know why else you are scumreading me, but given the little time I have to set aside for this game, I think I have already put in a lot of effort all things considered by carefully evaluating Mena's case on Cinnamon and looking to read Chemist on my own.In post 1649, Pink Ball wrote:ofrhz, look into my eyes and say that again, say that you think that you and Chemist being my two best options is "pretty bad". Do you think you don't deserve to be lynched here? Do you think I'm wrong about you? Like you really think that? Like, take the whole "I'm town you're wrong" bullshit for a moment and tell me: am I wrong at scumreading you in this game? Should I be townreading you, for real????In post 1641, ofrhz wrote:No I think this is pretty badIn post 1556, Pink Ball wrote:Yep, I'm all clear: today's lynch, brought to you by your lovely host Pink Ball, is between ofrhz and Chemist! *cheers*
Why do you scumread Chemist?
Same question about Chemist, and now I DO have meta on him 'cause I've played two times with town!Chemist already, both times I've wanted to lynch him at some point on the game (the second time I did lynch him and I was wrong), so I know I tend to scumread him for the wrong reasons, but now I think it's different and I'm following that trail. Again, am I wrong at scumreading that slot? Should I townread him, for real????
The meta? It was right hereIn post 1652, Pink Ball wrote:Answer my question before asking your own.In post 1648, ofrhz wrote:Why would you say that my vote on Gamma is demotivating and infuriating when I said that I looked at Cinnamon's games and came to the conclusion that he is not playing his usual town game here?In post 1646, Pink Ball wrote:I've never played with Cinnamon before and I don't do meta stuff. So the whole Cinnamon scumreads where because of meta? I don't remember that being the case.In post 1639, ofrhz wrote:? Do you disagree that Cinnamon has been playing differently from their past town games?In post 1474, Pink Ball wrote:I want to agree with you Pine, but I've tried to derail Gamma's wagon for a while now and even after your big cool post there seems to be no change at all. ofrhz's vote on Gamma is demotivating at best and infuriating at worst
Your vote on Gamma was infuriating because we were starting to discuss shit about that slot to see if we should continue with the lynch or maybe start another wagon, and you just came in, yeeted a vote on him and left. You've been really absent in general and especially during this day, so that intermition of yours was, as I said, demotivating for the rest of the people who were trying to figure things out.
In post 1341, ofrhz wrote:I don’t think menalque is just making up meta. A couple of cinnamons posts do seem like busywork. Cinnamon asking Tim for his townreads is a pretty general/vague question whereas cinn seems to only have asked questions about a specific player in his completed town games.
but what if the buttons I want to push are the ones that make you smileIn post 1654, Pink Ball wrote:I'm VERY emotional right now after watching Stranger Things, you don't want to push my buttons PikachuIn post 1650, Detective Pikachu wrote:I hear the scumminess really amplifies the more questionmarks there are at the end of a question
OmgIn post 1662, Detective Pikachu wrote:but what if the buttons I want to push are the ones that make you smileIn post 1654, Pink Ball wrote:I'm VERY emotional right now after watching Stranger Things, you don't want to push my buttons PikachuIn post 1650, Detective Pikachu wrote:I hear the scumminess really amplifies the more questionmarks there are at the end of a question
Hmmm yeah I usually use our famous Newbie as a reference of your playstyle so you may be right on that one.In post 1661, ofrhz wrote:I don't think you have to be townreading me, but I do think I've done some things that are townreadable already. I don't think I should be scumread for periodically lurking, but now that I think about it, I think you might've stopped playing mafia before I started lurking in some of my town games
My issue is that your top two pushes for today are me and someone else who I think is just lynchbait
Menalque et al, can you label your lists more cogently? I have no idea how to read this.
Okay, but without labels and an odd gap in the middle, that's hard to tell. I've been reading Menalque, so I could intuit that GEmerald was the bottom, but lacking that it's confusing.In post 1164, Creature wrote:Oh right you're not 2018 generation.In post 1163, Klick wrote:Activity tell? I'm unfamiliar.