Mafiascum.net

[/area]

Sorry for the recent lack of activity, real life kinda got in the way of mafia

Anyways, i don't think i'm super happy with a prana lynch, like, a watcher is really ballsy to fake, and watcher kinda fits the "theme" i'm seeing with this game rn

(Like, all roles are kept pretty simple, apart from Flipy's combined shenanigan)

But at the same time i don't see any other proper wagon, i'm still susp of BM even though he doesn't have a gun

He’s a traitor alright.

Game solved.

In post 1652, notscience wrote:He’s a traitor alright.

Game solved.

if the traitor conspiracy is true, it would be amazing given that we thought it was flippy/gypyx as a potential traitor, and not BM.

gunsmith/bulletproof are the perfect roles you'd expect to see in a traitor setup, which is the main reason for my paranoia.

but lets not get carried away.

we need a scum flip to restore some faith that we're on the right track, rather than deal with a low percentage conspiracy.

In post 1654, Hoopla wrote:we need a scum flip to restore some faith that we're on the right track, rather than deal with a low percentage conspiracy.

I agree, so more Hoopla votes please.

Hoops I’m saying gyp is a traitor I don’t like his stance re prana

It explains a lot of this game. Why it was brought up in the first place, and why prana scum wouldn’t claim a guilty now.

In post 1656, notscience wrote:Hoops I’m saying gyp is a traitor I don’t like his stance re prana

In post 1657, notscience wrote:It explains a lot of this game. Why it was brought up in the first place, and why prana scum wouldn’t claim a guilty now.

oh i see, don't know why i read it that way.

it makes sense.

i don't know how likely it actually is, but it makes sense.

Check how many times prana gives a stance on him hoops. Do it.

In post 1659, notscience wrote:Check how many times prana gives a stance on him hoops. Do it.

literally never.

you might be on to something here.

Is tomorrow lylo?

In post 1661, notscience wrote:Is tomorrow lylo?

nah, if we mislynch today it's (probably) 2:6 tomorrow.

Okay. I have something to talk about that can wait then.

@hiraki please feel free to check the same things I just told hoopla to check and let me know if that makes any sense to you.

I don't know if I agree 100% but it just affirms that Gypyx should not be touched with a 5 foot pole.

Here's a better question -

Gypyx - what is the "theme" you see with this game?

In post 1654, Hoopla wrote:we need a scum flip to restore some faith that we're on the right track, rather than deal with a low percentage conspiracy.

So uhh.. You sort of keep saying these things that sometimes lowkey seem like they come from a scum-perspective..
I'd argue that the scum need a townflip to restore some faith, considering how we lynched one scum yesterday..?

She’s saying that my tinfoil theory needs the flip to fully develop and can’t fully implicate gyp which is fair.

I know, I know.
It just seems weird saying that we need a scumflip to restore faith, considering that we have avoided one nightkill, and lynched correctly 1/2.
I'd call that a good start.

I really, REALLY want Prana lynched today.
Because if they do end up flipping town, I want notscience and rope to start hanging around more..

I fully understand the position I’m in lol

In post 1668, UnaBombaH wrote:I know, I know.
It just seems weird saying that we need a scumflip to restore faith, considering that we have avoided one nightkill, and lynched correctly 1/2.
I'd call that a good start.

personally, i like crushing the scum into the dirt.

any town death - especially the ones at our hands - is a tragedy.

In post 1672, Battle Mage wrote:VOTE: Hoopla

This is good posting.

In post 1673, PranaDevil wrote:

In post 1672, Battle Mage wrote:VOTE: Hoopla

This is good posting.

I'm trying dude, but I think it's probably a lost cause, everyone is pocketted for some reason.