https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
Dunno. I'm just not sure there's a point in assuming third party just because of one extra kill.In post 1649, Dumb and Dumber wrote:How do you think SS died?In post 1641, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Also i doubt there's a third party in this setup now.
- Dumber
I mean. I am willing to believe there are 3 roles that lower corruption given there are 4 self-harm claims (one confirmed - Saintess), even though they kinda act like mini vigsIn post 1513, Bell wrote:Stealing wrote:Cleric- Norwee (Decrease corruption by 1)
Cleric- redtea (Decrease corruption by 1)
E.H.- Banana (Self-harm 1 corruption to increase day time by 24 hours, Can't place votes at 0 corruption.)
Jackel -VT
Dumb & Dumber-VT
Porkens-Beast master(self-harm, 1 corruption increase to target another player, sacrifice pet and lose target ability to survive if corruption is 3 or greater)
Catboi-VT
Starbuck -Self-harm VT
(KIA) NDMath -VT
(KIA) S_S -Saintess(Mod confirmed role, Jack of all trades)
(KIA) Joey_ -VT
(KIA) Bell -Demon of Gluttony
(KIA) androgybee -Martyr(Self-destructing purification role thing...?)
If we have 2 clerics, there has to be a 3p I think. Or town is pretty stackedIn post 1653, Dumb and Dumber wrote:I'm not saying that one extra kill means there's a 3p, but we're missing some details that would explain his death
My working theory rn is: fruit + using his investigative ability + 3rd unknown corruption point, causing him to die
- Dumber
My self harm extends the day 24 hoursIn post 1657, Porkens wrote:Could you have self harmed yesterday to give yourself a vote?
Yes they could have.In post 1657, Porkens wrote:Could you have self harmed yesterday to give yourself a vote?
Didn’t miss where they explained why they didn’t do thatIn post 1659, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Yes they could have.In post 1657, Porkens wrote:Could you have self harmed yesterday to give yourself a vote?
2 separate notifications. 1 was fruit received, 2nd was corruption increase, yeahIn post 1660, catboi wrote:@Banana - You received notice of receiving fruit from the moderator, rather than just a corruption increase, correct?
Yep. They just didn't read their role properly apparently.In post 1662, Porkens wrote:Did i*
I did explain it. I missed it day 1 lol. My role card is literally an encyclopediaIn post 1661, Porkens wrote:Didn’t miss where they explained why they didn’t do thatIn post 1659, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Yes they could have.In post 1657, Porkens wrote:Could you have self harmed yesterday to give yourself a vote?
After I die you'll see, its like part of another section instead of its own thingIn post 1665, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Yep. They just didn't read their role properly apparently.In post 1662, Porkens wrote:Did i*
When will you start playing the game?In post 1663, Jackel98 wrote:Oh votes reset, neat. It's a sign that I should go back to voting Norwee
VOTE: NorwegianboyEE
And if you're town you just accepted that and turned yourself into a wallflower?In post 1670, Jackel98 wrote:I mean, when I tried to ask questions, I get told to shove it up my ass so idk
Yeah, then I don't think S_S got fruit, the likely plan was for Bell to try to hide his role by acting like negative utility, handing out a second fruit would have outed him. I think we're still looking at a 3p kill here. Also think multiple clerics makes sense as a safeguard against accumulation of corruption.In post 1664, BananaCucho wrote:2 separate notifications. 1 was fruit received, 2nd was corruption increase, yeahIn post 1660, catboi wrote:@Banana - You received notice of receiving fruit from the moderator, rather than just a corruption increase, correct?
When has this happened?In post 1670, Jackel98 wrote:I mean, when I tried to ask questions, I get told to shove it up my ass so idk