Mafiascum.net

Did chem do the thing yet.

@Penguin, I just don't see a reason why hiding reasons you think A50 might be town helps us at all? Especially when he's not here and he isn't generating reasons for or against his elimination.

No, but he doesn’t have to since he replied in to Mena’s slot, not Gamma’s.

As for A50, I obviously have a reason or I wouldn’t have said what I did.

In post 1560, TemporalLich wrote:

Chemist1422 replaces Menalque.

Hi there. What colour is your PM? (Don't think. You've got 10 seconds to respond)

In post 1562, RCEnigma wrote:UNVOTE: I'm a naughty naughty boy

Evil Naughty?

In post 1563, RCEnigma wrote:

In post 1536, Almost50 wrote:BTW, RCE totally ignoring my existence (my first post was on page 2) is SCUM indicative.

I will not fall to your mind games THIS time Monkey!

Evil mind games?


Handsome post btw [/quote]

Evil handsome?

In post 1587, teacher wrote:Thing is, Im not really in love with any push RN either, certainly not enough to make one.

In post 1613, RCEnigma wrote:

In post 1590, PenguinPower wrote:Chemist slot is bad unless he does the Chemist thing for redemption.

That should be apparent to several of you.

Chemist do the thing.

Get off your back four, get on top more

In post 1618, TemporalLich wrote:Hiraki & Teacher is not a valid vote

But you can't deny it's a good name for a singing duo. Almost as good as Hall & Oates or Simon & Garfunkel

I'm done catching up. I am wondering why almost every is eager to start a CC to Jake's? If he is scum he only has ONE partner. If he is town he hasn't done a single thing to show it.

Conclusion: Everyone ON Jake currently is TOWN. His p is trying to save him AND the other team view him as a weak link they should not eliminate yet. IF he is town then all 4 scums are trying to eliminate a stronger player. Let's not forget he already claimed VT, so scum don't want that today.

Err assuming you're town as well then scum just... Don't want to lynch town today?

That's what I'm getting out of that. Also conflicts with the sentiment scum is content with the gamestate, what do you think of that stance A50?

In post 1662, RCEnigma wrote:Err assuming you're town as well then scum just... Don't want to lynch town today?

That's what I'm getting out of that. Also conflicts with the sentiment scum is content with the gamestate, what do you think of that stance A50?

What I get out of it is scum doesn't want to eliminate Jake. If Jake is scum, then it stands to reason his partner doesn't want to eliminate him. If Jake is town, it could be that scum just wants another claim. They might also be suspecting that Jake is part of the other scum team and don't want him removed yet, because scum don't know whether someone is town or part of the other scum team.

As for scum being content with the gamestate, I propose something different: 7/13 players have swapped out. It is very likely that at least one scum player has swapped out. I think it's possible that there's scum in a member who replaced in, who doesn't yet fully understand the game state and doesn't want to disrupt it for fear of standing out.

I dunno, the constant counterwagons to Jake feel pretty disruptive

In post 1663, Marashu wrote:

In post 1662, RCEnigma wrote:Err assuming you're town as well then scum just... Don't want to lynch town today?

That's what I'm getting out of that. Also conflicts with the sentiment scum is content with the gamestate, what do you think of that stance A50?

What I get out of it is scum doesn't want to eliminate Jake. If Jake is scum, then it stands to reason his partner doesn't want to eliminate him. If Jake is town, it could be that scum just wants another claim. They might also be suspecting that Jake is part of the other scum team and don't want him removed yet, because scum don't know whether someone is town or part of the other scum team.

As for scum being content with the gamestate, I propose something different: 7/13 players have swapped out. It is very likely that at least one scum player has swapped out. I think it's possible that there's scum in a member who replaced in, who doesn't yet fully understand the game state and doesn't want to disrupt it for fear of standing out.

"Would any replacement not want to disrupt the gamestate? It would be hard to analyze something onjectively, when they have a clouded view of it."

You say clouded view. I say different perspective. I think town would be trying to look for a fresh take, and some of the people who have repped in have indeed done that.

In post 1663, Marashu wrote:

In post 1662, RCEnigma wrote:Err assuming you're town as well then scum just... Don't want to lynch town today?

That's what I'm getting out of that. Also conflicts with the sentiment scum is content with the gamestate, what do you think of that stance A50?

What I get out of it is scum doesn't want to eliminate Jake. If Jake is scum, then it stands to reason his partner doesn't want to eliminate him. If Jake is town, it could be that scum just wants another claim. They might also be suspecting that Jake is part of the other scum team and don't want him removed yet, because scum don't know whether someone is town or part of the other scum team.

As for scum being content with the gamestate, I propose something different: 7/13 players have swapped out. It is very likely that at least one scum player has swapped out. I think it's possible that there's scum in a member who replaced in, who doesn't yet fully understand the game state and doesn't want to disrupt it for fear of standing out.

Thanks A50.

In post 1666, Marashu wrote:You say clouded view. I say different perspective. I think town would be trying to look for a fresh take, and some of the people who have repped in have indeed done that.

Such as?

In post 1662, RCEnigma wrote:Err assuming you're town as well then scum just... Don't want to lynch town today?

That's what I'm getting out of that. Also conflicts with the sentiment scum is content with the gamestate, what do you think of that stance A50?

Maybe it's me, but I don't understand either of these two lines. Can you rephrase in a more evil phrasing?

In post 1664, dramonic wrote:I dunno, the constant counterwagons to Jake feel pretty disruptive

What counterwagon has gained serious/sustained traction?

marashu, almost, dunn?
That's a strange question.

Key word is sustained there.

I feel like none really have, and I think that’s kind of important?

The first was Dunn. 1Just as it got serious - like in the exact same time period as the fourth vote - Someone deflected away and broke its momentum.

Then came Maru. I don’t think this ever really rose to a potential/momentum wagon, even if it did have 4 votes for brief period (less than 24hrs). Ditto A50.

I think it’s kinda telling that these slots were also pushed as counters by different people, including me who gave intent on Jake. I guess I just don’t see the all-day wagon without a serious or sustained counter as being scum. I freely admit that I don’t see Jake as adding much and so am still willing to hammer it to move the game along, but I’m nonplussed after the lack of evolution/sorting I’m seeing generally.

I agree with the first 3 lines, but disagree with your conclusion.

I'm much more inclined (or confbiased, if you feel that way about me) to think that the repeated half-assed attempts to swing a wagon somewhere else is indicative of Jake being scum.
1. His buddy doesn't want to lynch him and have to solo the game, especially cuz they can just lose to a lost bullet.
2. The opposing scumteam has no incentive to lynch him, he's exebait to them. (I'm aware this is true regardless of his alignment). Testing the waters on other wagons is much more beneficial to them.

If Jake was town any scum coulda just taken the easy hammer when it was available with little suspicion, and to be quite blunt his continued existence benefits both scumteam EVEN if he somehow flips town.