yeah but this should have formed earlier no?In post 1649, Albert B. Rampage wrote:The deadline is paused. We have time back on our side.In post 1647, SirCakez wrote:ABR doesn't it feel weird to you how this wagon only formed within a day of deadline though?
again i've had those reads well before the wagon formed ...In post 1644, SirCakez wrote:I agree that all of F&G's townreads being people not interested in elimming them is off
yes ...In post 1650, SirCakez wrote:yeah but this should have formed earlier no?In post 1649, Albert B. Rampage wrote:The deadline is paused. We have time back on our side.In post 1647, SirCakez wrote:ABR doesn't it feel weird to you how this wagon only formed within a day of deadline though?
Are you serious? If you're scum, it's all of them. If you're not scum, then it's none of them. What kind of question is "which one do you think is fake", as if one head is town and the other is scum and I'm going to pick apart and distinguish between every post you made so I can explain how I caught you. It's ridiculous.In post 1646, Fun and Games wrote:oh ok now we're getting somewhere.
Which one do you think is fake? Let's go through the reasoning and you can let us know what's fake.
Believe me I tried.In post 1650, SirCakez wrote:yeah but this should have formed earlier no?In post 1649, Albert B. Rampage wrote:The deadline is paused. We have time back on our side.In post 1647, SirCakez wrote:ABR doesn't it feel weird to you how this wagon only formed within a day of deadline though?
that never really pulled together thoughIn post 1652, Fun and Games wrote:yes ...In post 1650, SirCakez wrote:yeah but this should have formed earlier no?In post 1649, Albert B. Rampage wrote:The deadline is paused. We have time back on our side.In post 1647, SirCakez wrote:ABR doesn't it feel weird to you how this wagon only formed within a day of deadline though?
it's kinda like how support for iks came out of the woodwork randomly a few days ago when we were in a similar position
this scum forgot to cover up the OMGUS.In post 1583, I Keep Siteflaking wrote:VOTE: NoraaIn post 1569, Noraa wrote:Not caught up but ur just gonna vote the leading wagon. Nice. Into the SRs u go.In post 1566, I Keep Siteflaking wrote:VOTE: Bingle
Not fully caught up and will not be able to do till Friday.
u can't talk to us about compromising when ur the lead wagon cuz that's not compromising. Thats just listening to u and not limming u. I love how ur compromise is hey don't kill me but kill this one and then sus this one. This is NOT a compromise.In post 1585, Fun and Games wrote:I'm unlikely to get through with reason to ABR/Noraa/Johnny/Gamma/CreativeMod.
So I'd like to offer a compromise of sorts.
Flip bingle and have ABR prove his role on us if Bingle is not guilty.
I think that would be perfectly acceptable no?
If any of you actually want to reason out your case on us I'm happy to talk. :3
this is interesting. Very interesting. We'll have to come back and read this if either cake or fun flip red.In post 1592, Albert B. Rampage wrote:It matters a lot.In post 1587, Fun and Games wrote:why does it actually matter whether it's viable or not? You seem to be more interested in proving that it is viable to wagon me than you are interested in whether I'm guilty.In post 1584, Albert B. Rampage wrote:There was creative, johnny, me, noraa, by the time you said it wasn't viable.
Do you not understand what's actually important in this game?
Cakez borrowed a move from my playbook of trying to present the options for today's lynch. He's more aggressive to defend you than I've seen him play in other games, and his initial reason was "F&G is active so I don't want to lynch him or the game will become stale".
good catch. ABR pointed this out twice and fun didnt reply(I haven't caught up yet so if u replied later, I haven't seen it yet)In post 1597, Albert B. Rampage wrote:You selectively pointed out nora for not having their facts straight when literally 2 posts above, cakez didn't even realize you had more than 2 votes on you. If you're town, you should be at least a little suspicious of cakez trying to take a bullet for you from out of nowhere.In post 1570, Fun and Games wrote:it's literally not the leading wagon but facts don't seem to matter to you
lmao great reasoning. U have my approval to flip red. Now go flip red ^^In post 1602, I Keep Siteflaking wrote:I voted Bingle, because he is currently in 1v1 with FaG.
I have never played with scum Skitter, but I have played games with town Skitter. In both of these games she
a) townreaded and defended me ✓
b) kept asking questions I wanted/ would ask ✓
Both happens in this game. If Skitter can't fake these details into her scum game, she is very likely town.
I have FaG in townleans. At least.
V OTECOUNT 2.043 | ||||||
P LAYER N AME | C URRENT V OTES | S TRENGTH | S PEED | K NOWLEDGE | P LAYER N AME | |
Gamma Emerald | None | EL-7 | 3 | 2 | 4 | Gamma Emerald |
SirCakez | None | EL-7 | 2 | 3 | 3 | SirCakez |
CreativeMod1 | None | EL-7 | 3 | 3 | 3 | CreativeMod1 |
Albert B. Rampage | None | EL-7 | 3 | 3 | 3 | Albert B. Rampage |
Chara | None | EL-7 | 3 | 3 | 4 | Chara |
Bingle | PenguinPower, SirCakez, Fun and Games, Nosferatu | EL-3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | Bingle |
Nosferatu | None | EL-7 | 3 | 3 | 4 | Nosferatu |
I Keep Siteflaking | None | EL-7 | 3 | 3 | 3 | I Keep Siteflaking |
PenguinPower | Bingle | EL-6 | 3 | 3 | 3 | PenguinPower |
Fun and Games | Albert B. Rampage, Noraa, CreativeMod1, JohnnyFarrar, Gamma Emerald | EL-2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | Fun and Games |
Noraa | I Keep Siteflaking | EL-6 | 3 | 3 | 3 | Noraa |
JohnnyFarrar | None | EL-7 | 3 | 3 | 3 | JohnnyFarrar |
Not Voting | Chara | |||||
With 12 alive, it takes 7 to eliminate. Deadline: (expired on 2020-10-14 12:10:00) | ||||||
Notes: Currently searching for a replacement for Chara. pagetops: Lilith 29 | penguin 15 | ABR 5 | johnnyf 3 | cm1 2 | gamma 2 | gb 1 | fun & games 2 | nosferatu 2 | cakez 2 | bingle 1 | iks 1 | noraa 1 | ||||||
true, but mostly because i made a big stink about it while it was formingIn post 1655, SirCakez wrote:that never really pulled together though
well thenIn post 1658, Noraa wrote:The more ABR talks, the more town he seems. He shares most of my thoughts and im having a lot of town pings there. He is putting an effort into his posts. Its 100% noticeable now.
You tell em NoraaIn post 1663, Noraa wrote:my town block that im fairly confident in rn is ABR, Noraa
Why the hell are the people who are Town by mechanics (cmod and nos primarily, me as well but it’s based on something only I truly know, though I just had a thought about that thing) in your “lesser town” group?In post 1611, Fun and Games wrote:also just wanna make sure i get this out:
town: penguin, iks, sircakez
lesser town: gamma, nos, cmod
null: chara/pine
scum-ish: abr, johnny
scum: bingle
noraa: probalby bad town but they're playstyle is remarkably annoying
i'm not sure gamma actually knows what he thinks or can articulate his scum!us or not-scum!bingle position
~ skitter
In post 1616, I Keep Siteflaking wrote:there is no way an account called "i keep siteflaking" is an altIn post 1607, Fun and Games wrote:(i'm asking if you're an alt, not to reveal the alt)
I think with that wack read list, this is a very fair evaluationIn post 1621, Albert B. Rampage wrote:looks like your play is more about consolidating your power base and pocketing town. unfortunately for you, my forte is pushing through difficult lynches on strong scum.
Okay then. Still a good idea to consolidate in advance.In post 1649, Albert B. Rampage wrote:The deadline is paused. We have time back on our side.In post 1647, SirCakez wrote:ABR doesn't it feel weird to you how this wagon only formed within a day of deadline though?