Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 7:20 am
oops my bad
Do you have experience with taylorIn post 1645, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:i can actually see taylor doing that because she's a massive shitposting troll
i find it less likely she does it when she's an actual traitor
Has taylor been pushing for jakescum in the hood?In post 1653, Syryana wrote:I did some counting and by my calculations taylor is at E-2
UNVOTE:
Want some more of that sweet sweet conversation
I literally just thought about a double traitor theory this morning when I was trying to figure out what the fork he’s doing here. (Although there was some talk in the neighborhood about possible setups Nd multiple deaths, but we decided against those.In post 1652, The Bulge wrote:Tammy sorry if you've gone more in-depth somewhere already, but im wondering about your bell placement. from what I remember reading youve spent far more time elaborating on why bell is not town than why he is not full informed scum and I'm not sure I understand what's stopping you from scumbinning him. how set are you on the double traitor theory, or were you just wanting to put your thoughts out?
I am paranoid about so many things. One of my first thoughts when I saw that I was in a dethy was about the word "neighborhoodIn post 1652, The Bulge wrote:Tammy sorry if you've gone more in-depth somewhere already, but im wondering about your bell placement. from what I remember reading youve spent far more time elaborating on why bell is not town than why he is not full informed scum and I'm not sure I understand what's stopping you from scumbinning him. how set are you on the double traitor theory, or were you just wanting to put your thoughts out?
i intentionally didnt share any of the posts that pinged me because we agreed not to out the dethy today and i therefore didnt want to draw attention to anyone in the dethy. i said as much in the PT.In post 1651, Cabd wrote:Your ISO has zero mentions of Jake except the reply to my question.
You haven't voted Jake, you haven't suspected Jake, you haven't even thought about Jake.
Why?
a) its funIn post 1649, Something_Smart wrote:In post 1644, midwaybear wrote:That was probably intentional.y'all need to shut up, I was obviously trying to get Tayl0r to clarify without letting her know what I was looking for.In post 1645, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:i can actually see taylor doing that because she's a massive shitposting troll
i find it less likely she does it when she's an actual traitor
Okay Tayl0r if it wasn't an accident why did you do it then?
i actually did a dive on fakegod large themes to estimate how many scum in a game and surprisingly 3 out of 17 is the typical number, BUT those are typically open or semi-open setups with either some specialized wincon, or extra killing power on the mafia side. this one is full closed (a rarity!) and so there's no secret wincon, 3 groupscum + a traitor would make sense imoIn post 1658, Tammy wrote:I literally just thought about a double traitor theory this morning when I was trying to figure out what the fork he’s doing here. (Although there was some talk in the neighborhood about possible setups Nd multiple deaths, but we decided against those.In post 1652, The Bulge wrote:Tammy sorry if you've gone more in-depth somewhere already, but im wondering about your bell placement. from what I remember reading youve spent far more time elaborating on why bell is not town than why he is not full informed scum and I'm not sure I understand what's stopping you from scumbinning him. how set are you on the double traitor theory, or were you just wanting to put your thoughts out?
Yesterday I wondered if the scum team knew of the existence of a traitor and thought that it possible everyone was searching for something. I was thinking about the setup because we have 17 players which would typically mean 4 scum but three scum plus one traitor doesn’t feel right, so this morning I thought maybe two?
I just don’t understand what bell is doing here if he’s town or scum.
To a minor extent. Jake said something about us needing to solve for the traitor quickly in case they are able to talk with grpscum.In post 1655, Cabd wrote:Has taylor been pushing for jakescum in the hood?In post 1653, Syryana wrote:I did some counting and by my calculations taylor is at E-2
UNVOTE:
Want some more of that sweet sweet conversation
Specifically what are you asking if it's accurate?In post 1671, Bell wrote:Is that accurate FF?
...it's fun to get mis-exed?In post 1665, Tayl0r Swift wrote:a) its fun