Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2021 5:57 pm
At least Dunn was VT. Kinda surprised by how fast that came together, we weren't really at deadline yet were we? Feel like there was at least a day left
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
In mymind he was just a low poster.In post 1655, ChaosOmega wrote:VOTE: T3
The progression from 1583 to 1612/1614/1615 reads as forced. You scumread me for my point about Dunn, but don't know enough about his posting history to be shocked about it and vote him to push the wagon across the line. With the later posts as context, 1583 reads more like scum jumping on my wagon than town trying to sort me and making a read.
---
Titus, any response to 1587? I'm more interested in the 2nd part.
Mainly a compromise vote.In post 1657, ChaosOmega wrote:Alright, I want to try to gauge your mindset here:
- After reading Dunn's ISO in 1612, is my 1489 less scummy, equally scummy, or more scummy?
- When you voted Dunn, was it a compromise vote to get an elimination through because he was the leading wagon, or did you scumread him from his low activity?
In post 870, Dwlee99 wrote:I don't want to think about the neighbors right now.
In post 882, Dwlee99 wrote:I think claiming the hood early is the best thing to do as town unless you can convince me otherwise.
Wondering if you think Kyo is scummy? You've really done your best to avoid talking about the neighbors but seem to side with Anya easily. That tracks with your thought process that claiming neighbors is a town play...but the rest of these actions don't follow because in 880 you say there's probably scum in neighborhoods.In post 964, Dwlee99 wrote:Anya I've been convinced, throw DGB on the pile of people I'm willing to lim.
The Dunn wagon sprung up after you beetlejuiced.In post 1587, ChaosOmega wrote:So your baseline for activity is posting more than literally nothing?In post 1584, Titus wrote:In general, if there's activity and nothing negative, I put the slot as town as the majority of players are town. I just don’t see a reason for a Dunn wagon.
Now that you're beetlejuicing and wagoned Dunn springs up.
I don't know what you're implying with the 2nd part. What is the relationship between my entrance to the game and the Dunn wagon? I mean, I voted for Dunn, so there's a connection in that respect, but it seems like there's something else you mean with this.
My 964 was in response to 961 which I took as a good reason to scumread DGB. I'm willing to vote Andre if there's momentum for that.In post 1663, Dragon of the West wrote:Oops I meant to link 888 not 880.
But they haven't done or explained anything. And for some reason that's good enough for everyone. You're jumping on a bad wagon, DGB is town
You were right hereIn post 937, Dwlee99 wrote:DGB keeps disagreeing with me on the most random and stupid mechanical stuff and I think it is just DGB indicative rather than alignment.
I like this and I want to see more from the hood today.In post 1667, Dragon of the West wrote:I just take issue that for the past 800 posts you've been stuck on DGB and Andre but even those reads don't seem to have a ton of conviction. DGB just bothers you and Andre you've just said is lurky. The only other scum read I remember you mentioning is you'd be "willing to compromise" on voting Rathe. You don't want to touch the hood and in your own words you've had a hard time reading the active posters. Bleh I don't like it and the DGB wagon is so bad
Correct. i don't have strong reads right now.In post 1667, Dragon of the West wrote:even those reads don't seem to have a ton of conviction
Ok, let me ask a different way. Things can happen close together in a game and be unrelated. I am aware the Dunn wagon happened after I posted in the game initially because I can read and understand the passage of time. The way you're talking about them implies a causal link between the two. Go into how the two things are related and what that means.In post 1661, Titus wrote:The Dunn wagon sprung up after you beetlejuiced.In post 1587, ChaosOmega wrote:So your baseline for activity is posting more than literally nothing?In post 1584, Titus wrote:In general, if there's activity and nothing negative, I put the slot as town as the majority of players are town. I just don’t see a reason for a Dunn wagon.
Now that you're beetlejuicing and wagoned Dunn springs up.
I don't know what you're implying with the 2nd part. What is the relationship between my entrance to the game and the Dunn wagon? I mean, I voted for Dunn, so there's a connection in that respect, but it seems like there's something else you mean with this.
My answer isn't going to change because you reask Omega.
I'm talking more about the scum risk of Nero being protected.In post 1648, Dragon of the West wrote:Can you explain what you're saying like I'm an idiot?In post 1627, VFP wrote:However, I don't think they target Nero as a protective PR, meaning that this wasn't a consideration when killing and most likely means Titus is lying
You think Titus is lying about being a babysitter enabler because he's scum, meaning the scum team knows he's lying, and therefore don't hunt for a protective role with their kill? If I have that thought process right, what about Nero's slot makes you think scum wouldn't kill there looking for a protective role?
Alternate scenario: what if Titus is town so scum believe his role claim and then kill someone that they think wouldn't protect any of the mafia since that would mean risking a scum death
I don't think this is an accurate retelling of what happened?In post 1672, Titus wrote:All he did was accuse me of strategic vla.
Actually quite the opposite.In post 1351, Nero Cain wrote:Don't really want to suggest that Titus went v/la just b/c she is scum as she's prob busy IRL and that has nothing to do with her scum pm here but going v/la for the rest of the day phase and not unvoting seems kinda ass.