Mafiascum.net

In post 1641, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 1638, SirCakez wrote:

In post 1623, Dwlee99 wrote:I'm burden of proficiency-ing you right now, I don't think town!cakez scumreads me here.

Why not?

I'm towning it up in here that's why.

Not really

In post 1645, Tigerente wrote:I don't know who our target should be >.>

nope

lmfao *now* you appear

We flipping sircakez y/n?
If no i'd want to vig him

gamma whle people are discussing reads: ...
gamma while he has questions to answer: ...

gamma when someone points out how he's very deserving of a vig shot: *there in literally 1 minute and 7 seconds to post a 1-word reply*

In post 1655, Tigerente wrote:We flipping sircakez y/n?
If no i'd want to vig him

i think realistically this day always ends on a cakez flip, but the two things we need to do beforehand is (1) umlaut giving his block target (done) and (2) you giving your vig target (not done)

so like

unless you (or anyone else) has ideas for flipping someone else that we might be able to agree upon, i think we just get the two things above done and flip cakez and go from there. like the game is just gonna grow in apathy the longer we're in limbo like this.

Ok fine, give me + bork a bit to sync on a target
I would advise keeping cakez off of e1 sp that he doesnt self hammwr prior to those things being decided

Should we make targets conditional on the flip? Roleblock I guess not, but maybe the vig target should be?

In post 1659, Tigerente wrote:Ok fine, give me + bork a bit to sync on a target
I would advise keeping cakez off of e1 sp that he doesnt self hammwr prior to those things being decided

Self-hammering would be playing against win condition, no?

I think gamma's interactions with a50 upon a50's entrance (in particular calling him out for the M slip) + the timing of his kerset vote are anti-partnery

In post 1661, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 1659, Tigerente wrote:Ok fine, give me + bork a bit to sync on a target
I would advise keeping cakez off of e1 sp that he doesnt self hammwr prior to those things being decided

Self-hammering would be playing against win condition, no?

Oh fair point

In post 1660, Dwlee99 wrote:Should we make targets conditional on the flip? Roleblock I guess not, but maybe the vig target should be?

Not sure its a coditional decision for us

Eh maybe it is for bork actually, i think he wanta to flip you on a town-cakes flip

considering there are no more partner-scum alive, i don't see how a conditional improves anything

i mean, if cakez flips bp sk, you can deviate from the plan since there will no longer be anything to stop you, but other than that /shrug

pedit: huh nvm then

best timeline: there is no serial killer. there is an extra vigilante that mena erroneously put into the setup that shot a50. cakez flips last scum and the game ends. all of the planning was for nothing.

In post 1665, Tigerente wrote:Eh maybe it is for bork actually, i think he wanta to flip you on a town-cakes flip

I don't like that plan

In post 1666, Datisi wrote:considering there are no more partner-scum alive, i don't see how a conditional improves anything

i mean, if cakez flips bp sk, you can deviate from the plan since there will no longer be anything to stop you, but other than that /shrug

pedit: huh nvm then

The conditional would be something like "If cakez flips sk, shoot person more likely to be maf than sk" and "If cakez flips maf, ..." etc. If cakez flips town then I guess the shot target is much less dictated by a conditional and it's just whoever is scummy.

right, that makes more sense.

In post 1667, Datisi wrote:best timeline: there is no serial killer. there is an extra vigilante that mena erroneously put into the setup that shot a50. cakez flips last scum and the game ends. all of the planning was for nothing.

lol they would've claimed by now

im fine with a cakez flip here but I want to see conditional choices from vig/blockers so we have an idea of what to do tomm plz

In post 1668, Dwlee99 wrote:I don't like that plan

I mean i'm sure u dont but i'll leave it to bork to discuss because this is what he wants

From my pov there's only so many slots to vig
Infinity is conftown
Umlait is all but conftown from our pov assuming he isnt like the last scum claiming a50's action or something

Pooky is apparently gonna be the rb target

Leaving dats heaven gamma dwlee penguin if we flip cakez

Fwiw i still dont really townread pooky either

dwlee what's your cakez experience to the point you feel you can make this BoP argument

also just didn't expect that kind of thing from you considering how ardently anti-meta you were earlier in the game

-b

In post 1673, Tigerente wrote:dwlee what's your cakez experience to the point you feel you can make this BoP argument

also just didn't expect that kind of thing from you considering how ardently anti-meta you were earlier in the game

-b

I played with him years and years ago and we generally were decent at figuring out when we were town. Okay, actually, cakez would just always think I was town when he was town from what I remember. I don't really consider BoP the same thing as meta, it's just kind of like cakez please be better at playing this game and figuring it out (which kind of exists for everyone), and I think that town!cakez would have a smaller PoE but he has to include me because otherwise there aren't enough miselims for him to win.