Mafiascum.net

In post 1648, Galron wrote:Roden was flexing a PR. I assume there's a vig in the game. I wanted to know if that was Roden.

You think an odd night gunsmith would be the only investigative?

Why would you want to know who a vig was? If a vig shot happens, then investigate. A vig detection would just force him to claim. Shouldn't you be looking for scum?

In post 1648, Galron wrote:Roden was flexing a PR. I assume there's a vig in the game. I wanted to know if that was Roden.

You think an odd night gunsmith would be the only investigative?

If you’re town why are you trying to find the town vig? Your play reeks of scum PoV

If Galron is scum, I'm supposing that scum can't interpret PRs correctly or Galron is outright lying about his check.

However, I'm inclined to believe a town investigative of somesort exists.

In post 1641, Galron wrote:

In post 1638, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1625, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: galron
Fork it, I was floundering for reasons to TR him D1 and I know from LN 235 that tends to be a bad sign

That's E-2.

My vote makes it E-1.

Claim time, tick tock.

Tick tock.

Odd-night gunsmith. Checked Roden.

You checked someone who softed PR and who you said you town read? Instead of sb9, who you scum read? What was the thought process behind that?

In post 1648, Galron wrote:Roden was flexing a PR. I assume there's a vig in the game. I wanted to know if that was Roden.

You think an odd night gunsmith would be the only investigative?

Why would town care if I'm a Vig?

Kinda sounds like you're a Mafia Gunsmith hunting for a Vig. Possibly afraid you for Tracked or that I got Watched.

In post 1656, Roden wrote:Kinda sounds like you're a Mafia Gunsmith hunting for a Vig. Possibly afraid you for Tracked or that I got Watched.

*got, not for

Also in what universe does a Vig openly soft PR? I'd just be inviting a Roleblock lmao.

In post 1648, Galron wrote:Roden was flexing a PR. I assume there's a vig in the game. I wanted to know if that was Roden.

You think an odd night gunsmith would be the only investigative?

So you weren't looking for scum with your odd-night PR?

It also tracks that scum would want to keep SB9 from pressing Roden to claim if they learn Roden has a gun and want to silence him before he can out a potentially harmful cop result or something, which establishes the logic for that NK
As such I think Roden should out any investigative results he has ASAP if he’s a role that is investigative and shows up as having a gun to a gunsmith

Am I investigative? From a certain point of view, yes. But I have no results to offer today.

Do I have a gun? Idk, ask Galron. He hasn't actually told us his results yet. All he said was that he checked me.

I'm pretty sure he just wanted to see reactions once he claimed.

In post 1659, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1648, Galron wrote:Roden was flexing a PR. I assume there's a vig in the game. I wanted to know if that was Roden.

You think an odd night gunsmith would be the only investigative?

So you weren't looking for scum with your odd-night PR?

I was trying to cnfirm a tr. It's what I do.

In post 1662, Roden wrote:Am I investigative? From a certain point of view, yes. But I have no results to offer today.

Do I have a gun? Idk, ask Galron. He hasn't actually told us his results yet. All he said was that he checked me.

I'm pretty sure he just wanted to see reactions once he claimed.

Totally wasn't my read on your role. Ok.

In post 1641, Galron wrote:

In post 1638, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1625, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: galron
Fork it, I was floundering for reasons to TR him D1 and I know from LN 235 that tends to be a bad sign

That's E-2.

My vote makes it E-1.

Claim time, tick tock.

Tick tock.

Odd-night gunsmith. Checked Roden.

Interesting.
Do you have a soft?

VC 2.03

T3 (1):

Titus

Galron (5):

Save The Dragons, T3, Roden, Gamma Emerald, DrippingGoofball

Kop (1):

HockeyFan

HockeyFan (1):

Galron

Not Voting:

GrandpaMo, marcistar, Kop

With

11

remaining,

6

votes to eliminate

Deadline: (expired on 2021-09-22 07:59:05)

So, what was your result? I think we should llim Galron if he doesn't provide a satisfactory answer.

Hey Titus, you might want to vote Galron.

In post 1644, Galron wrote:

In post 1639, HockeyFan wrote:The people on this wagon are ppl i like as town but I still dont like the galron wagon itself and idk why. Like I'm down to vote Galron but I really dont want to atm

Why not? If you're willing to vote me, why not now?

Because I thought u could have townspewed/slight chance u are townspew.

ftr, Galron basically scumclaimed with his check, but too early to hammer imo

Just hammer Galron tbh

I want the check tho smh

.-.

although checking roden for the "possibility" of him being vigi is ehhh