Mafiascum.net

I'm really bad at pretending to be angry. It doesn't matter if we share the same suspects. I changed my mind after a scum lynch, while you aren't reviewing or thinking about the game.

I don't think I'm the first person to admonish you to read the same game as the rest of us but um, read the game. My posts today have specifically been about how my positions have changed in light of new information. AKA reviewing and thinking about the game.

your current read on CES please.

your current read on Shadow please.

yolo

why are you voting CES?

Why do you people keep asking me questions I've already answered today.

^This is not an answer I like. This is an answer that when/if CES flips scum, I'm going to look to lynch you. All you said, is "you're not against it".... if there's more... well I'm sure it really couldn't be that HARD for you to restate... i mean fuckinga.. Did you think 1680 would be a satisfying post?

This is such a plague on this site. MAYBE I WANT IT RESTATED/REPHRASED/EMBELLISHED... fuck you have no idea how many times I waste my time looking shit up to not find it or even better to have people even go... Oh yeah I guess I didn't.

For fucks sake... just restate it.. if the info is easy enough how hard of a request am I asking? (I get legwork, but come on...) Its your own fucking thoughts... spend 5 minutes to repost them instead of me spending 20 minutes siphoning through your posts. Goddamn/rant/uallsuck.

RANT CONTINUED

If it's your own thoughts, and all I'm asking is for you to share them again, it should be fucking simple as pie. Saying makes me think you don't want to trip up.

Maybe I didn't understand what you said, we are reading words.... context/intent can be misleading. Even quote/link it if its that obvious, you should be able to wade through your iso to find it 100X more easier than me!

Again unless you have something to hide, and all I'm asking is for your thoughts, it should be free flowing and simple.

Shrug. I think the evidence points to itself. I haven't found CES himself scummy, but I didn't find Nacho himself scummy either. I trust the evidence more then I trust my own judgement. Nacho was clearly avoiding giving reads on CES and said he'd do a reread that never happened, it's a standard scum play. I mean this post wasn't that long ago. In the first quote Nacho doesn't sound like he's talking about someone he has a town read on. He says reasons to suspect CES to be scum, then says 'but they're fine'. It's like trying to justify a town read that you know doesn't exist.

If that's not clear enough I can look up a thesaurus to say the same thing again for you. I'm more interested in finding the third then continuing to prove why someone everyone else already thinks is scum, is scum.

I guess your not seeing the value in independent thought... that whole distancing thing that applies to buddies.. well say he flips scum, guess who looks like distancing?

If that's what you think it looks like. I've already said I think I'm expendable. I don't even think you have a bad case against me since it'll prove I've been defending two scum. I can't change the past. I also don't know what you mean with distancing because I'd probably already be voting him as scum, I'm much better at bussing then distance. I've never promised a reread that's never happened and I've never shirked talking about them when people asked me and hoped they never noticed. Just pointing out scummy things someone has done isn't scummy.

Also he's still not flipped yet. You could at least wait to see if we're right before deciding I'm their buddies.

Actually i probably have promised to reread and not done it earlier, just I didn't pretend that I had. <_<

I'm telling you how it looks... If you haven't noticed, I'm voting Llmarable.

I had noticed. What do you think Nacho was doing then, voting Llamarble literally every day?

Recently got back from a party, surprisingly not drunk but exhausted, I've gone over DV and Benmage and have taken notes so I'll write up a synopsis of their play and their interactions with Nacho when I wake up.

↑ Shadoweh wrote:Empire, what do you think of the argument Nacho and CTD were having over whether to lynch N or not? I would dearly like to believe that OGML's phoning it in is coming from a limping scum.

I honestly thought about that at some point during the last Night phase and the only thing I could come up with is that traitors don't make sense (on my other site, traitors work very differently mechanically and are very rarely used). Reading over them again, the CTD/Nacho interaction is kind of weird for scum/scum even without the N stuff but it seems even weirder for posts like CTD's #522 to come across like him trying to persuade Nacho to bus -- I don't really have anything to substantiate this though. Basically, at this point, I'm ready to ditch everything CTD said as WIFOM-laced red herring type nonsense and just pursue other leads especially given that we have another scum flip to mine through for interactions.

↑ Benmage wrote:

EMPIRE

why are you voting CES?

PoE, like I said before. Thinking over the number of townreads I have, especially the strong ones, I have a really hard imagining a scum team without CES in it so I think he's the best shot at hitting scum today.

More limp fur yay!



In 705 the part on CES has noticeably the least content of everyone. I actually don't think scum would very likely do this to their buddy, but I'm not sure it's enough to make him more town than anyone else.

1344 seems really awkward if they're buddies.

Nacho answering questions for CES is also really weird... Again, I think it might point away from them being scum together.

1497 is interesting because it's not very long before deadline, CES includes Nacho in his scumteam, Nacho is the most viable looking counterwagon at that stage, CES is voting for someone else, and I also think he's generally willing to compromise on lynches, so

On the other hand, why not just vote for Nacho if they're scum together? I mean, I don't think he could've had much hope in OGML being lynched over him/Nacho at that stage? So Eh, maybe slightly more likely from scumbuddies.

I'll have to think about all this again later and obviously go through everyone else, but I'm not sure if I'll want to lynch CES now.

~~

I might get through another one tonight.

DV, buddy, do foxes need glasses? Why would scum give more content on their buddies? What do you think of the content itself? Why is it weird to ask why your scumbuddy can't be town when you're not commiting either way with the question? That post 1497 you linked to is pointing towards CES not saying anything about Nacho at all (if you're trying to prove me wrong on OGML it hurts me inside though).

Empire, it is very unlikely that both the traitor knew who the scum are and the scum knew who the traitor was. That would not really be much different from having an additional scumteam member. Usually only one (if any) is aware of the other I think.

I'm pretty sure the definition of a traitor here is they know who the scum are and the scum don't know who they are. In ADwD that's how it worked for our traitor.

↑ Shadoweh wrote:DV, buddy, do foxes need glasses? Why would scum give more content on their buddies? What do you think of the content itself? Why is it weird to ask why your scumbuddy can't be town when you're not commiting either way with the question? That post 1497 you linked to is pointing towards CES not saying anything about Nacho at all (if you're trying to prove me wrong on OGML it hurts me inside though).

They wouldn't give more, but I don't think they'd be likely to give a lot less either. As scum, I think you're very aware of how you're treating your buddies and giving less content on a buddy is the kind of thing that scum would think would look bad, but really it's not hard to just do the same amount of content on your buddy as everyone else (which is what scum want to do to make their interactions with everyone look the same) and I really don't think this is an attempt to make CES look like his buddy because people aren't weird like me.

The content itself doesn't really indicate anything as far as I can tell.

The question is just something I imagine scum would feel very awkward saying.

CES included Nacho in his scumteam in 1493, sorry. I don't think I'm saying anything about OGML, but I still have to look at him.

I find it mildly amusing that the person who has proven she's not reading the game over and over got annoyed at being asked to answer something shed already answered.

I'm fine with shadoweh or ces flipping today. Not gonna put him at l-1 right now though.

I still think there's something to the ctd interactions with nacho and shadoweh, and it sure does look like nacho tried to start a benmage counterwagon to shadoweh on day two. Unless nacho was bussing. Don't feel real great about that though. I'm just more suspicious of shadoweh as her play just oesnt make sense or town.

What does that have to do with anything? You're a poster child for how being hypocritical isn't a scumtell. The only way I see CTD's posts is he was trying to hint that he knew I was town because he was scum to Nacho or something. The two of them had weird conversations about eveeryone. I think CTD was picking fights with him on purpose.

Benmage probably isnn't scum so he was probably not bussing Benmage. My play doesn't make sense as a person maybe, but town has the right to be irrational.

Starting at 982 they have a back-and-forth which lasts longer and is a bit more extensive than I'd expect from scumbuddies. Still possibly a distancing attempt, but 1042 in particular seems like more effort than one would go to to defend themselves in response to a scumbuddy after the other posts related to it as well.

He mentions how he wouldn't mind a Nacho lynch over a CES lynch a lot (this being the previous day), which could be scum feeling self-conscious about voting CES over Nacho, but you also have 1489 where I think he'd be more keen to justify being on CES's wagon over Nacho's as scum? Also, just skimming through his ISO as I do this gives me town feelings all over again.

Yeah, I still don't know about his play around the CES/Nacho wagons and he says it AGAIN in 1511, but I do think he's town.

Oh yes, please explain what you liked about Nacho's case on me. I don't think you did before.

Overall, his posting just seems really town. Only weird thing is maybe trying too hard to sound open to a Nacho lynch without actually lynching Nacho. Maybe that's a better explanation of what I was trying to say before, but even with that they don't work that well as scum together, so I don't think I'll be going here.

~~

Going for the double!!! Let's hope it actually happens this time.



First, N stuff.

122 could maybe not be possible from scum because of being too worried about sounding too certain (almost like a scumslip in a way). It's N though, so I'm not sure.

The really extended Nacho = scum thing is nicely explained by them being buddies though...

Defending of N could be with N-town or scum.

N not being in Nacho's wall of reads could be a slight point away from buddies.

Aaand, there's nothing much at all from the OGML side of things.

Ehhh, I'll sort it out later.

~~

Hmm ok, a third's not happening right now.

>.>

Post tonight.