Mafiascum.net

In post 1672, bubbajack8 wrote:

In post 1665, Guyett wrote:What was I like in faith +1 then?

In Faith PLus 1 you actually gave useful things. You actually had a full fledged read list with reasons.

I don't really do read lists anymore

You gave unofficial votecounts.

Because you weren't around all the time

you NEVER unvoted at L-1 for space, you were ALWAYS confident in your reads.

Newsflash I'm not always that confident.

You did however unvote at L-2 for better wagon analysis, but did not derp hammer that person.

So???

You gave cases.

I'm technically V/La right now and have been for 4 weeks or so due to being in Canada doing college work. I have put together bits of cases but don't really have time to put together proper ones

You have done none of those things here. You haven't given a long reads list with reasons, you've been rather uncommitial, had the derp ahmmer, and have unvoted multiple times.
OMG no lists... SCUM (check other games buddy)
OMG not commital... SCUM ( see above)
OMG derp hammer... SCUM (see recent games, especially too many heads mafia)
OMG unvoting is now scum???

YOu haven't posted a single votecount.

That's because SC is actually on top of things

You actually seemed to try in Faith PLus 1.

LOL before the fake hammer in post 2208 I was not trying at all

You're not giving me the same impression here....

You're either blind or scum trying to force an easy mislynch

In post 1677, Snork wrote: Why do you have to make sense

In post 1671, Snork wrote:

In post 1670, Dr Pants wrote:snork, no offense meant here, but you put a lot of faith in your ability to meta read people. Is this how you typically read people? Because one thing I'm noticing, all the people you are familiar with are in your town reads, and the rational behind it is their meta.

And if they were playing to their scum meta, I'd be pushing their lynch with everything I've got. Ask them. They know that have and would.

In post 1675, Guyett wrote:If he flips town lynch me

In post 1678, Guyett wrote:

In post 1672, bubbajack8 wrote:

In post 1665, Guyett wrote:What was I like in faith +1 then?

In Faith PLus 1 you actually gave useful things. You actually had a full fledged read list with reasons.

I don't really do read lists anymore

Why not?

In post 1678, Guyett wrote: You gave unofficial votecounts.

Because you weren't around all the time

LOL! That's BS. You didn't even wait an hour, there was a time you did ONLY votecounts. SC hasn't been here sometimes, and others have requested VCS, and you haven't given any.

In post 1678, Guyett wrote: you NEVER unvoted at L-1 for space, you were ALWAYS confident in your reads.

Newsflash I'm not always that confident.

You were in that game.

In post 1678, Guyett wrote: You did however unvote at L-2 for better wagon analysis, but did not derp hammer that person.

So???

So the only time you did unvote for wagon analysis you didn't revote. Unlike this game when you did.

In post 1678, Guyett wrote: You gave cases.

I'm technically V/La right now and have been for 4 weeks or so due to being in Canada doing college work. I have put together bits of cases but don't really have time to put together proper ones

And have you been V/LA this whole game?

In post 1678, Guyett wrote: You have done none of those things here. You haven't given a long reads list with reasons, you've been rather uncommitial, had the derp ahmmer, and have unvoted multiple times.
OMG no lists... SCUM (check other games buddy)
OMG not commital... SCUM ( see above)
OMG derp hammer... SCUM (see recent games, especially too many heads mafia)
OMG unvoting is now scum???

Either your confidence has gone down since Faith Plus 1, which you act like it hasn't, or you don't try anymore. Those are the only logical explanations to you being town this game. Because your play in these 2 games are vastly different.

In post 1678, Guyett wrote: YOu haven't posted a single votecount.

That's because SC is actually on top of things

As stated earlier people have asked for VCs and you haven't.

In post 1678, Guyett wrote: You actually seemed to try in Faith PLus 1.

LOL before the fake hammer in post 2208 I was not trying at all

False: You gave a long reads list before that fake hammer.

In post 1678, Guyett wrote: You're not giving me the same impression here....

You're either blind or scum trying to force an easy mislynch

In post 1687, Snork wrote: can we just lynch gm now please?

In post 1689, Titus wrote:@bubba, you'd think by now their whole, I'll fake claim scum to try to see who jumps on and call them scum gambit would not be applied twice in the same day. It's almost as if they think we're idiots. Bad meta, wrong meta, gambits to create additional suspects.

In post 1693, Snork wrote:I'm not sold on jingle and I'm not a huge fan of the whole thing. I explained why, and the strength of that on the last page. I have very strong feelings about gm/titus. Why do you not want to lynch either of them, bubba?

In post 1693, Snork wrote:I'm not sold on jingle and I'm not a huge fan of the whole thing. I explained why, and the strength of that on the last page. I have very strong feelings about gm/titus. Why do you not want to lynch either of them, bubba?