↑shos wrote:seriously titus? this was like the first posts in the game. you're saying that scum got a vanilla PM pregame and town didn't? what kind of a mod gives scum the VT pm and doesn't publish it?
Town doesn't always get a VT PM. Scum would need safeclaims. Pretty obvious. Then you capitalize on the mod not doing that.
show me one game in which scum got the vanilla role PM and town didn't.
↑shos wrote:seriously titus? this was like the first posts in the game. you're saying that scum got a vanilla PM pregame and town didn't? what kind of a mod gives scum the VT pm and doesn't publish it?
Town doesn't always get a VT PM. Scum would need safeclaims. Pretty obvious. Then you capitalize on the mod not doing that.
show me one game in which scum got the vanilla role PM and town didn't.
ika is chaotic in all games. re:nati, I will have to reread that slot. we might actually want to policy lynch before it's Xylo.
The last Magic Large Theme I was in for one. There hasn't been a "universal" vt PM though so that's the closest analogy. Show me a game where scum claiming VT would automatically be outed a scumclaim because they didn't know the VT code.
im posting from my wiiu cus im abusing auyockicking on ckicker heros right now so i dunno how this is going o turn out
shows your answer
titus is still depring or just scum
bbt is still scum who is selectivly attacking
gc could be scum
dr dude is probally scum
nari is scm or disintrested vt
fish is prob town
i already told you that most of my reads are gut calls and bouncing off people who i think are town.
your not going to get more then that untill i take action tonight
↑ika wrote:titus im just ingoring you b.c i know your scum now and if your town yous just stupid i have linked 2 games (ONE OF WHICH WE JUST RECENTLY FINISHED) where you did the same jack shit as scum
pedit: dealer, VT
I guess the biggest problem with me accepting that this is a slip from ika is the fact that it requires believing that, within the span of 40 posts and 12 hours, ika forgot what he posted in Post 1082.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
↑Titus wrote:Think, how could scum fake claim vanilla townie if all the town were given the SAME vt pm without them having been provided it?
A mod wouldn't structure a setup where scum claiming vt would automatically be a scumclaim.
Therefore, scum knew all VTs were dealers.
Fair. I don't know how I was distinguishing between scum being given a safeclaim and scum being told the VT role (so that they could safeclaim VT).
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
If ika is town, it means he was lying and trying to get reactions.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
