https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
In post 1673, podoboq wrote:Maybe I'm misreading this, but Zach hasn't owned up to anything.In post 1666, Titus wrote:If you want to wagon him, something other than he was fakeclaiming to get someone lynched since he owned up to it before Dunn reached L minus 1.
How much experience do you have offsite?In post 1638, podoboq wrote:Analyzing why mafia targeted who they targeted at night is ALWAYS wifom in my experience.In post 1632, Titus wrote:Scum have to shoot and tell US what they fear. They tell us about associatives.
The unvote was a retraction of the mason CC. We said e retracted multiple times, no one said anything.In post 1673, podoboq wrote:Maybe I'm misreading this, but Zach hasn't owned up to anything.In post 1666, Titus wrote:If you want to wagon him, something other than he was fakeclaiming to get someone lynched since he owned up to it before Dunn reached L minus 1.
We don't need to lynch in you four, we need to wagon in you four. Get one of the mason claims retracted.In post 1670, Dunnstral wrote:Zach isn't claiming mason so get that out of your head, we don't need to lynch in us 4.
wait whatIn post 1664, Zachstralkita wrote:Anyways, I'm not speaking further until certain variables align themselves in the right way for me.
There you go again with those assumptions!In post 1677, Titus wrote:The unvote was a retraction of the mason CC. We said e retracted multiple times, no one said anything.In post 1673, podoboq wrote:Maybe I'm misreading this, but Zach hasn't owned up to anything.In post 1666, Titus wrote:If you want to wagon him, something other than he was fakeclaiming to get someone lynched since he owned up to it before Dunn reached L minus 1.
I play mafia (we call it werewolf) in person every Friday of the week. Usually between 12 and 20 people.In post 1676, Wake1 wrote:How much experience do you have offsite?In post 1638, podoboq wrote:Analyzing why mafia targeted who they targeted at night is ALWAYS wifom in my experience.In post 1632, Titus wrote:Scum have to shoot and tell US what they fear. They tell us about associatives.
In post 1640, Transcend wrote:I honestly think if you're fake claiming you should just retract lol.
This whole mason debacle is clogging the whole chat and distracting us from other scum hunting that could be done.
In post 1642, Transcend wrote:I knew it lol
No, I agree with Agar on this.In post 1644, implosion wrote:Two things.AGar wrote: Wait seriously? Masons are ridiculously strong town power, and you think there'd be 2 sets of 2 in a fucking 19 player game?
Hoooooly shit.
One, yes, I do? It's 19 player game. There's gonna be a lot of power. I also disagree that they're a "ridiculously strong town power." I mean just fucking look at what's happening today with people not believing the mason claim. Two, I don't actually think this [read: i think varsoon/zach are BSing]
Because literally any of the like 10 reasons I gave in my last couple dozen posts. I'm not fucking explaining it again.AGar wrote:Why put off for tomorrow what you can do today?
So fucking much.Titus wrote:This has got to be the stupidest game of mafia ever.
Scum please dayvig me and save me from this. This game is a chore given scum and dumb town spam.
Getting anyone to work together in this is impossible.
Jesus christ.
In post 1684, Zachstralkita wrote:Nah I retract, sorry Varsoon I think they might actually be masons so I made a judgement call.
UNVOTE:In post 1684, Zachstralkita wrote:Nah I retract, sorry Varsoon I think they might actually be masons so I made a judgement call.
WhyIn post 1687, Zachstralkita wrote:As much as I want them to not be town
Both Masons, or both Town?In post 1687, Zachstralkita wrote:As much as I want them to not be town, they probably are.
Does it matter to anyone but scum?In post 1690, Wake1 wrote:Both Masons, or both Town?In post 1687, Zachstralkita wrote:As much as I want them to not be town, they probably are.
...it's not a bad idea.In post 1691, Dunnstral wrote:You've got a spr-In post 1689, podoboq wrote:remove it from my spreadsheet.
nevermind.
Dunnstral wrote:WhyIn post 1687, Zachstralkita wrote:As much as I want them to not be town
Can you respond to me on the implosion stuff
If I looked at all the facts and sincerely believed that they were scum I would have kept up the lynch. They're probably masons. I just need them to both stop doing that bullshit that they be doing.Wake88 wrote:Both Masons, or both Town?In post 1687, Zachstralkita wrote:As much as I want them to not be town, they probably are.
It's a valid question.In post 1692, Titus wrote:Does it matter to anyone but scum?In post 1690, Wake1 wrote:Both Masons, or both Town?In post 1687, Zachstralkita wrote:As much as I want them to not be town, they probably are.
I like to keep track of players' claims for easy access so I don't have to go digging if I forget. It's nothing more. I know Plotinus makes very elaborate spreadsheets of how players interact with one another and stuff, but mine is nothing like that. Just claims.In post 1691, Dunnstral wrote:You've got a spr-In post 1689, podoboq wrote:remove it from my spreadsheet.
nevermind.