Mafiascum.net

In post 1673, Waco Kid wrote:@Imperium:

Honestly, one of the reasons I think MoI is pretty towny is because he's actually explaining out his reads a bit.

Which contrasts pretty hard with my dislike for hiplop who been a whole lot of nothing and naked votes

Can most of your reads be summarized by "they are explaining their reads" or "they haven't been explaining their reads"?

In post 1529, MagnaofIllusion wrote:And yet Snarky isn’t anywhere to be seen on your radar. I have issues with the discontinuity in your posting and stated motivation and subsequent play.

It's not really true that Snarky isn't anywhere on my radar; I chose Waco over him because I hoped that pressuring Waco might result in something fruitful whereas I've played with Snarky long enough to understand that it probably isn't happening. My original comment about Snarky was more directed towards Cheetory, who seemed pretty frustrated with the possibility of Snarky!town and trying to get day 1 to be something more complex than lynching Snarky Day 1 for typical Snarky. I'll vote him if Waco produces something middling to decent.

For Broseiden: I don't think scum posts #1443, but so much of the rest of his iso is just sillyness, rage and AtE

p-edit: No, there aren't enough people posting explanations to do that, haha. I mention it for MoI, because I feel like his posts stand out from the pack in this

I think you're townreading MOI for being MOI.

He writes a lot of words but I think those words kind of suck

Hell, my top town read on Grib is high % meta read, but it's at least given me something to work with.

I won't lie, I been struggling a bit with the lack of actual strong cases made, and just the wild easy wagons. Def a different style than i'm used to

In post 1678, Cephrir wrote:I think you're townreading MOI for being MOI.

He writes a lot of words but I think those words kind of suck

Maybe so, but enough of those words have made sense to me that I'm not concerned about it

In post 1677, Waco Kid wrote:For Broseiden: I don't think scum posts #1443, but so much of the rest of his iso is just sillyness, rage and AtE

p-edit: No, there aren't enough people posting explanations to do that, haha. I mention it for MoI, because I feel like his posts stand out from the pack in this

So you agree with Firebringer's take on the post then?

(in reference to BRO's #1443)

In post 1680, Waco Kid wrote:

In post 1678, Cephrir wrote:I think you're townreading MOI for being MOI.

He writes a lot of words but I think those words kind of suck

Maybe so, but enough of those words have made sense to me that I'm not concerned about it

What cases or reads have you agreed with?

In post 1541, MagnaofIllusion wrote:You supposed distain for shit-slinging peaks my interest given that you aren’t knocking either Camnt or Bro who personify that particular brand of posting.

You kind of answer your own question here; Katsuki and BRO are occasionally (not always, but occasionally) personifications of shit-slinging; as a result, I'm not particularly inclined to spend my time trying to convince them to stop.

In post 1681, Imperium wrote:

In post 1677, Waco Kid wrote:For Broseiden: I don't think scum posts #1443, but so much of the rest of his iso is just sillyness, rage and AtE

p-edit: No, there aren't enough people posting explanations to do that, haha. I mention it for MoI, because I feel like his posts stand out from the pack in this

So you agree with Firebringer's take on the post then?

(in reference to BRO's #1443)

Apparently so

In post 1541, MagnaofIllusion wrote:What is the point of this response to Firebringer given he specifically went out of his way to say “This is for the Mod” other than to look like you are interacting with the slot?

No point other than curiosity; just wondering what he thought was a "horrible" kids' tv show character.

;_;

68 pages ;_;

In post 1687, kraska77 wrote:68 pages ;_;

Thank all the people who say "Large walls are anti-Town" and proceed to put what could be easily summarized in a single post in a string of 5 to 15 posts thus artificially inflating the page count which is hella Anti-Town.

In post 1631, Waco Kid wrote:

In post 1629, keyenpeydee wrote:So does that mean we will exclude that he's a mafia because he has the Cookie Monster name and because he's chilling and eating cookies for his stupid life.

Actually it has a lot more to do with the fact I have a provable role, but hey

I like the expectation the wagon will move off him.
I don't like the logic.

In post 1688, MagnaofIllusion wrote:

In post 1687, kraska77 wrote:68 pages ;_;

Thank all the people who say "Large walls are anti-Town" and proceed to put what could be easily summarized in a single post in a string of 5 to 15 posts thus artificially inflating the page count which is hella Anti-Town.

I don't think either style makes reading easier; some players will read in depth, other player's won't. I don't feel like kraska is going to be one of those players who actually reads and thus don't really feel too sorry for them.

I don't have too much more time here today, willing to drop my Waco push for now assuming that he keeps elaborating on reads (although I'd prefer more complete explanations if possible).

Vote will return if Waco doesn't deliver.

In post 1654, Waco Kid wrote:

In post 1642, Imperium wrote:also while you're expanding on reads could you explain what that camntsuki read was about?

Slot went from zero to pushing a BS policy lynch on my top town read, and some pushes that don't deserve the title of scum-hunting.

Hey is this true? That's the kind of ott stuff I tend to townread though
If their first move in the game was to transparently push a policy lynch then theyre probably town

So let's play a game, the game's called let's see how Waco Kid's reading people

In post 1610, Waco Kid wrote:This might be the worst wagon I've ever seen

I'm the Good Characters Cookie vendor, which basically clown except cookies instead of pies.

T: Grib
LT: MagnaofIllusion, Cheetory6/Trancend,
FoT: Medical Junkies, farside22, ConMan/Firebringer,
N: Dekes/kraska, DiamondSentinel, Cephrir,
FoS: camntsuki/spiffeh, Imperium, kdowns, keyenpeydee, BROseidon,
LS: hiplop, SnarkySnowman
S: Fox McCloud,

In post 1468, Eleven wrote:

[8] Waco Kid ~

SnarkySnowman

,

Imperium

,

Fox McCloud

, Cephrir,

hiplop

,

camntsuki

,

Firebringer

, DiamondSentinel
[5] camntsuki ~

MagnaofIllusion

, Waco Kid,

Grib

,

Transcend

,

farside22

[1] DiamondSentinel ~

kdowns

[1] Grib ~

BROseidon

Not Voting (3) -

keyenpeydee

, kraska77,

Medical Junkies

Yeah, totally not OMGUS at all.

-Luna

In post 1688, MagnaofIllusion wrote:

In post 1687, kraska77 wrote:68 pages ;_;

Thank all the people who say "Large walls are anti-Town" and proceed to put what could be easily summarized in a single post in a string of 5 to 15 posts thus artificially inflating the page count which is hella Anti-Town.

*slowly withdraws into the shadows bc I'm one of those people*

I like posts #1204 1367, and 1529 from MoI

p-edit: Are you saying you think Camntsuki was actually scum-hunting? If you're town-reading someone for that, than I can't stop you, but to me there was nothing at all I'm willing to give a town read about that play

Fox saying someone else is OMGUS'ing, I'm dying here,


Nobody notice how they avoid the content in favor of a one liner.

In post 1678, Cephrir wrote:I think you're townreading MOI for being MOI.

He writes a lot of words but I think those words kind of suck

this is why sometimes I ignore his post. I don't like reading that much.

In post 1696, Waco Kid wrote:Fox saying someone else is OMGUS'ing, I'm dying here,


Nobody notice how they avoid the content in favor of a one liner.

What content/context are they avoiding?
I don't think that their point on you is that horrible and avoiding content in favor of a one liner is basically what you did to them (although I guess I could qualify it as a one and a half liner if that made you feel better).

yea Keyen we've noticed... it's telling