Mafiascum.net

But it is? You literally said that I was partially lurking and doing nothing yesterday.

And your point about not wanting to develop reads. I sincerely doubted that it was impossible to have decent reads 50 pages in so yeah, ending the day earlier so we can reset mentally would be nice. If I were scum, Id love extra time to make my reads seem more genuine

Furthermore, feels like to me you didn't read me driving the kokichi wagon.

WIFOM argument isn't good. Your play D1 was bad and fake af with tchill lol. You enter today with a hypoclaim opening in a closed setup with a "sheep" vote on Seph - now you are pointing out hypocrisy in RL events when there is none.

I'm literally not. I never said sephiroth was lurking. I'm refuting the claim that I was.

My play d1 was bad, yes. So it should be clear why I'm not leaving town anymore. But calling me lurking I'd just a like

Leading

In post 1655, Sephiroth wrote:

In post 1653, Sephiroth wrote:I can't independently sr you

on how shit your reads are.

I literally said I scum read you based on your rolefishing yesterday. You're such a disingenuous piece of shit sometimes you know that? Like honestly the quote doctoring you just did goes beyond scum vs town, its literally just being a shitty person and shitty mafia player.

Get your shit together. For real.

Mew if you resigned to the purpose off making snide remarks to people's garbage posts.

Why don't you call this mess of a post out?

Your play when I replaced in D1 from what I saw was you literally just coasting on town cred and then you suddenly having random pings of paranoia on tchill while also denying any chance of a serious counterwagon because votes on A50 were going to become "vanity wagons". So here's my thought: I don't understand how do you have paranoia pings about someone when literally all they said about you is they like the way you play and they are posting like much less than any other player? How can you feel threatened by being pocketed through that?

Because it's what I do?

Oka if it makes you feel better take out the 'lurking' and replace it with coasting or active lurking. I honestly do think you were lurking but thats not at all the bulk of my reason for suspecting you and your insistence on splitting hairs on that point and then try to WIFOM your way out of my real point reads poorly.


As for the quoted post, are you saying that you approve of A50 doctoring my quote to misrepresent me or are you saying its a mess to call someone out when they do that?

Why the toxicity?

I'm a toxic player historically, and I have a history with AP/A50 from our last game.

I'm working on being less toxic but when someone purposefully cuts off part of my quote to misrep me when he even commented on my actual reason for sring him earlier, it makes me toxic.

Any other questions?

Saying you have a history of abusing drugs doesn't give you the right to abuse it.

Especially if you are aware of it, no?

Lol literally if me/Seph are right on our scum pools then the only play you can collectively make is to shade our slots so that we aren't listened to or else your team is hot dead in the water. If my scum pool matches Seph then why the fuck would I call an interaction between Seph and A50 again where A50 uses his emotions to his own personal benefit?

My updated scum pool from D1 is:
{Oka, A50, DVa} and Nako as a faraway pick

When did I said I had a right to? You asked why, I answered. I even said I'm working on it. I really don't think my last exchange with A50 was that toxic compared to many of my older games.

Like Oka wtf are you getting at? Do you toxicity is scummy or are you just trying to make me see jesus?

Seems to me that scum have resigned to being a dick to try and accomplish their win condition. Low ball.

So if the DNC or GOP nominated a person tomorrow that was corrupt and bullshit, do you think that the party should call them out?

In post 1690, Sephiroth wrote:Like Oka wtf are you getting at? Do you toxicity is scummy or are you just trying to make me see jesus?

Does it matter Iif I think toxicity is scummy ?

In post 1682, OkaPoka wrote:Because it's what I do?

You were supposedly afraid of being pocketed by someone that only said they "liked your play" and "hope you are town" because of that.
In the process, you justify being happy with a tchill lynch, actively deny counterwagons instead of pushing out content, and boom, free D1 lynch.

In post 1693, OkaPoka wrote: Does it matter Iif I think toxicity is scummy ?

...you know we're playing a game of mafia right now right? This entire conversation is a waste of time and space unless you think toxicity is AI. So lets get it out on the table instead of going round in circles. Do you or do you not think that my 'toxicity' has any bearing on my alignment or anyone elses?

Yes because he was being lazy about it and not playing the game.

We can form town blocs but people who don't play the game shouldn't be playing

Pedit: I could be interested in your take on toxicity to allow me to better understand your thought process

In post 1696, OkaPoka wrote:Yes because he was being lazy about it and not playing the game.

This is AI how?

Especially when his D1 meta was openly discussed or mentioned several times D1?

Because town wincon is to play the game and find scum while scum wincon is kill town. Scum lurking is playing to their advantage while town lurking isn't.


His d1 became a flanderization.