Mafiascum.net

In post 1665, Hiraki wrote:I don't know if I agree 100% but it just affirms that Gypyx should not be touched with a 5 foot pole.

Here's a better question -

Gypyx - what is the "theme" you see with this game?

Well, as I said, i'm seeing a pattern with pretty simplistic roles

Bulletproof / Roleblocker / Watcher

i'm waiting to see more of the setup, but if that pattern confirms itself, i think that flippy's claim could be out of place

Even though now that I think about it, we might now have any other PR

Cool Dog is being prodded

You know other than the flipped one flippys the only confirmed role right

In post 1678, notscience wrote:You know other than the flipped one flippys the only confirmed role right

No. Fuck off.

I'm very much a confirmed Watcher.

We know, as a fact, I AM a Watcher.

No scum would fake a Watcher claim, and then guess at shit, when it could be proven merely by someone actually targeting someone.

You trying to act like I'm not a Watcher is scummy as fuck.

Try to Lynch me then, buddy

I’m fine with it being you or me today

Guess we dropped the religious symbolism somewhere. Is Jesus still crying?

[/area]

Removed by the mod.

Do you think if I try to meta read cooldog he’ll magically reappear to tell me meta is shit?

So best I can tell we're wagoning a claimed Watcher. If the players on that wagon could give or quote a previous case for why that's a good idea, that's a good place to start.

ill start reading up in the meantime

Watcher was not on confirmed PR. Confirmed PR is dead. Watcher claims that he thought confirmed PR was being protected but also that he did not believe that. Either way, still not on PR.

"Confirmed PR" in this case is Agar being a roleblocker?

if so, can you fill me in on how Agar was confirmed? I'm reading from prana's intimal L-1 claim onward but haven't even reached end of day 1 yet

Agar confirmed Klick scum.

In post 1689, Hiraki wrote:Watcher was not on confirmed PR. Confirmed PR is dead. Watcher claims that he thought confirmed PR was being protected but also that he did not believe that. Either way, still not on PR.

This is still utter bollocks.

At this point I am going to call it for what it is, a very blatant lie.

You said it, not me. I can quote it a thousand times and you can call it a lie a thousand times. Doesn't really matter to me.

In post 1688, Micc wrote:So best I can tell we're wagoning a claimed Watcher. If the players on that wagon could give or quote a previous case for why that's a good idea, that's a good place to start.

ill start reading up in the meantime

tldr: it's a shit idea. And that's coming from me as the first person to call the slot out as scummy, but I'm sick of towns with limited firepower making premature hero-plays. It's not as if we couldn't lynch that slot later if needed, no justification for taking a punt now.

Welcome to the game - it's a bit of a slog with a bunch of players dominating the discussion but not really basing their approach on any reasonable arguments. I'm cop confirmed town, but I'm currently some people's choice for lynch tomorrow (after we lynch the Watcher...) as I might be investigation-proof scum (which of course is possible, but pretty low likelihood compared to, like, anybody else just being scum). We desperately need to lynch Hoopla/notscience to give town a fighting chance.

I don't even care, just look at the state of that Prana wagon. Like 25% of game is basically conftown, and none of them are on it, which speaks volumes.

In post 1691, Hiraki wrote:Agar confirmed Klick scum.

by blocking the N1 kill which caused Klick's scum flip D2 I assume?

In post 1692, PranaDevil wrote:

In post 1689, Hiraki wrote:Watcher was not on confirmed PR. Confirmed PR is dead. Watcher claims that he thought confirmed PR was being protected but also that he did not believe that. Either way, still not on PR.

This is still utter bollocks.

At this point I am going to call it for what it is, a very blatant lie.

I haven't found where you claimed your N2 action and why you targeted there. can you fill me in?

Battle Mage wrote: I'm cop confirmed town

someone fill me in on this too please.

all the claims really. helps me determine what parts of the thread are important to catching up and which can be mostly ignored.

me and unabombah are the inno-investigations of EmpFlippynips

[/area]

ok I found floppy's claim. but it says one-shot and you're giving two innocents?

im a bit confused about what the gamestate is tbh