Mafiascum.net

In post 1672, fferyllt wrote:

In post 1671, Bell wrote:Is that accurate FF?

Specifically what are you asking if it's accurate?

17.6% or 23.5% outside versus 20% inside.
What's the rationale behind each player's approach inside of the QT versus out of it?

In post 1673, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 1665, Tayl0r Swift wrote:a) its fun

...it's fun to get mis-exed?

you have an odd definition of fun, my friend

its fun to be wagoned and suspected. notice that theres a big wagon and pressure on me and suddenly im posting? not a coincidence. i told the dethy that too. i get my best reads when im interacting directly with people, especially when i can see their logic for their reads on me.

In post 1670, fferyllt wrote:I thought what Jake's post revealed was that he didn't know how traitors work.

my god it's beautiful

...Did you warn your masonry that you were going to scum drop all over the place before doing so?

In post 1677, petapan wrote:

In post 1670, fferyllt wrote:I thought what Jake's post revealed was that he didn't know how traitors work.

my god it's beautiful

fuck i dont know how traitors work. even after reading the wiki it seems like there are multiple possible options. but you dont see me dumbtelling over it. until now i guess

In post 1676, Tayl0r Swift wrote:

In post 1673, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 1665, Tayl0r Swift wrote:a) its fun

...it's fun to get mis-exed?

you have an odd definition of fun, my friend

its fun to be wagoned and suspected. notice that theres a big wagon and pressure on me and suddenly im posting? not a coincidence. i told the dethy that too. i get my best reads when im interacting directly with people, especially when i can see their logic for their reads on me.

This is some galaxy brain shit right here.

In post 1678, Bell wrote:...Did you warn your masonry that you were going to scum drop all over the place before doing so?

that would be no fun. but when they noticed i did come clean

In post 1680, Bell wrote:

In post 1676, Tayl0r Swift wrote:

In post 1673, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 1665, Tayl0r Swift wrote:a) its fun

...it's fun to get mis-exed?

you have an odd definition of fun, my friend

its fun to be wagoned and suspected. notice that theres a big wagon and pressure on me and suddenly im posting? not a coincidence. i told the dethy that too. i get my best reads when im interacting directly with people, especially when i can see their logic for their reads on me.

This is some galaxy brain shit right here.

thanks

are you on drugs right now

this is like performance art levels of trolling

im usually scumread in most of my games, so i just kinda learned to make the most of it and turn that into an advantage.

You're welcome you weirdo. lol.

In post 1676, Tayl0r Swift wrote:its fun to be wagoned and suspected. notice that theres a big wagon and pressure on me and suddenly im posting? not a coincidence. i told the dethy that too. i get my best reads when im interacting directly with people, especially when i can see their logic for their reads on me.

Okay. People are wagoning you because you crumbed traitor (and didn't do the obvious step of saying you were doing so in the neighborhood PT). You're almost certainly going to die now. What do you think of that logic?

In post 1685, Tayl0r Swift wrote:im usually scumread in most of my games, so i just kinda learned to make the most of it and turn that into an advantage.

I can't argue with that.
Except for the advantage part.

In post 1687, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 1676, Tayl0r Swift wrote:its fun to be wagoned and suspected. notice that theres a big wagon and pressure on me and suddenly im posting? not a coincidence. i told the dethy that too. i get my best reads when im interacting directly with people, especially when i can see their logic for their reads on me.

Okay. People are wagoning you because you crumbed traitor (and didn't do the obvious step of saying you were doing so in the neighborhood PT). You're almost certainly going to die now. What do you think of that logic?

its fine. i still think youre town. other people crumbed other aspects of the dethy. i chose the most fun part of the dethy to crumb.

well for example based on the last couple pages i have a stronger townread on SS and scumreads on peta and bell.

Seriously?

midway is scum too. pooky feels not great but im not sure yet.

In post 1691, Bell wrote:Seriously?

nah just kidding. or am i?

In post 1693, Tayl0r Swift wrote:

In post 1691, Bell wrote:Seriously?

nah just kidding. or am i?

so why did you crumb traitor i still don't get it

Looks like jake and gamma have played several games together so nvm

In post 1675, Bell wrote:

In post 1672, fferyllt wrote:

In post 1671, Bell wrote:Is that accurate FF?

Specifically what are you asking if it's accurate?

17.6% or 23.5% outside versus 20% inside.
What's the rationale behind each player's approach inside of the QT versus out of it?

Initial discussion was around whether/under what circumstances to out the dethy. I was on the "soon" end initially because of the weird effects that huge neighborhoods have on quantity and nature of game activity. There's a huge unknown thing in the game that's shaping the behaviors of almost 1/3 of the player list.

We decided to play that slow, try to solve the dethy using the strategy that applies in a game with only a dethy, and not actively hunt our neighborhood scumreads in the game thread.

We were all aware that if one of us gets run up then the dethy becomes public because regardless of alignment that's what a player is gonna do.

Jake asked at one point if we should vote as a block. I suggested we each should vote where our reads lead us.

And I should mention that although my reaction to the post that Tayl0r called TMI was that it suggested not understanding the traitor role. Jake later mentioned he'd played a game offsite where the scum were all traitors (which I doubt were normal traitors in the MS normal sense because how the hell would that work?

I'm subvocalization to text speechless.

You aren't the only big neighborhood with a conundrum