Mafiascum.net

i have ~reasons~ to think titus' behavior here doesnt reflects her alignment.

In post 1672, DkKoba wrote:peta is town

no...peta killed scum...must have bussed...

In post 1676, petapan wrote:

In post 1672, DkKoba wrote:peta is town

no...peta killed scum...must have bussed...

Don’t worry I am clearly scum here.

I will push Koba on today XD NK Bingle child Titus dies
DV on Day four then that leaves me and Peta as the last 1v1

That’s how you scum right? (Clearly sarcastic tone this is obvious BS)

Now Titus if you’re town whose the bad sheep, Koba or DV?

so why they kill on wagon tho

also im softing clear today

Tomorrow? Who knows

In post 1679, DkKoba wrote:so why they kill on wagon tho

Scum were prob off wagon as they didn’t get why Cakez was hammered is my theory.

should i just claim lol

In post 1683, DkKoba wrote:should i just claim lol

No. I think what you’ve done is enough. Besides I get bad gut vibes about that. You feel me?

Actually the more I think the more I like

VOTE: Koba

Fite me.

In post 1667, MathBlade wrote:Titus let’s pretend you’re town a second here. Why would Pink Ball ask me my strategy in open thread if I am Pink’s buddy?

The scum strategy is off the wall here. Pink Ball's play makes no sense. Why did he willingly seppuku by voting Cakez and early? It must have been planned, so I expect planned distancing.

In post 1674, DeasVail wrote:I am quite sure that Pink Ball's vote on Cakez was not with the intention of eliminating Cakez.

Why? Why else would Pink Ball vote his lover child?

In post 1687, Titus wrote:

In post 1674, DeasVail wrote:I am quite sure that Pink Ball's vote on Cakez was not with the intention of eliminating Cakez.

Why? Why else would Pink Ball vote his lover child?

VOTE: Titus

Distance vote. Just getting it down early.

In post 1678, MathBlade wrote:Now Titus if you’re town whose the bad sheep, Koba or DV?

I don't see a DV vote on Pink Ball.

My VC theory is inconsistent. No one voting on 1.1 should be scum, unless the plan was to eliminate Cakez from the outset. By voting you, I am hoping to suss that out.

It's probably either you or peta again, with Peta being resigned to the execution.

In post 1689, Titus wrote:

In post 1678, MathBlade wrote:Now Titus if you’re town whose the bad sheep, Koba or DV?

I don't see a DV vote on Pink Ball.

My VC theory is inconsistent. No one voting on 1.1 should be scum, unless the plan was to eliminate Cakez from the outset. By voting you, I am hoping to suss that out.

It's probably either you or peta again, with Peta being resigned to the execution.

No one voting on .... ha funny. That sentence is false. Scum were baited on.

I figured out Cakez was the mafia child and Poo was one of the parents.

Cakezypoo was telling Pooky that lmao. We quick hammered really fast.

Pretty sure I have deduced the other parent and child as well so who to elim is in a really narrow pool.

In post 1615, Pink Ball wrote:That's a good vote tho

Pink Ball scum claimed here when he said DV was a good vote but not joining meaning SirCakez was mafia child and he was distancing.

Pretty simple to advocate for quick hammer after that.
DV is prob Town.

Hence my future post of I townread most everyone.

I did not townread PB though and did not want him off the wagon.

Or maybe I am full of shit who knows?

In post 1688, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1687, Titus wrote:

In post 1674, DeasVail wrote:I am quite sure that Pink Ball's vote on Cakez was not with the intention of eliminating Cakez.

Why? Why else would Pink Ball vote his lover child?

VOTE: Titus

Distance vote. Just getting it down early.

If Pink Ball didn't intend for Sir Cakez to die, why didn't he unvote?

In post 1690, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1689, Titus wrote:

In post 1678, MathBlade wrote:Now Titus if you’re town whose the bad sheep, Koba or DV?

I don't see a DV vote on Pink Ball.

My VC theory is inconsistent. No one voting on 1.1 should be scum, unless the plan was to eliminate Cakez from the outset. By voting you, I am hoping to suss that out.

It's probably either you or peta again, with Peta being resigned to the execution.

No one voting on .... ha funny. That sentence is false. Scum were baited on.

I figured out Cakez was the mafia child and Poo was one of the parents.

Cakezypoo was telling Pooky that lmao. We quick hammered really fast.

Pretty sure I have deduced the other parent and child as well so who to elim is in a really narrow pool.

How did you suss out Cakez was the mafia child and Poo was a parent?

In post 1693, Titus wrote:

In post 1688, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1687, Titus wrote:

In post 1674, DeasVail wrote:I am quite sure that Pink Ball's vote on Cakez was not with the intention of eliminating Cakez.

Why? Why else would Pink Ball vote his lover child?

VOTE: Titus

Distance vote. Just getting it down early.

If Pink Ball didn't intend for Sir Cakez to die, why didn't he unvote?

Didn’t realize what was happening and/or wasn’t online.

In post 1694, Titus wrote:

In post 1690, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1689, Titus wrote:

In post 1678, MathBlade wrote:Now Titus if you’re town whose the bad sheep, Koba or DV?

I don't see a DV vote on Pink Ball.

My VC theory is inconsistent. No one voting on 1.1 should be scum, unless the plan was to eliminate Cakez from the outset. By voting you, I am hoping to suss that out.

It's probably either you or peta again, with Peta being resigned to the execution.

No one voting on .... ha funny. That sentence is false. Scum were baited on.

I figured out Cakez was the mafia child and Poo was one of the parents.

Cakezypoo was telling Pooky that lmao. We quick hammered really fast.

Pretty sure I have deduced the other parent and child as well so who to elim is in a really narrow pool.

How did you suss out Cakez was the mafia child and Poo was a parent?

C’mon now...can’t give away all my secrets to scum.

In post 1696, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1694, Titus wrote:

In post 1690, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1689, Titus wrote:

In post 1678, MathBlade wrote:Now Titus if you’re town whose the bad sheep, Koba or DV?

I don't see a DV vote on Pink Ball.

My VC theory is inconsistent. No one voting on 1.1 should be scum, unless the plan was to eliminate Cakez from the outset. By voting you, I am hoping to suss that out.

It's probably either you or peta again, with Peta being resigned to the execution.

No one voting on .... ha funny. That sentence is false. Scum were baited on.

I figured out Cakez was the mafia child and Poo was one of the parents.

Cakezypoo was telling Pooky that lmao. We quick hammered really fast.

Pretty sure I have deduced the other parent and child as well so who to elim is in a really narrow pool.

How did you suss out Cakez was the mafia child and Poo was a parent?

C’mon now...can’t give away all my secrets to scum.

I want to see if you knew all along or not. Being a mafia child doesn't seem to be something Cakey would crumb.

I mean you can try this angle but imho it was pretty obvious. I am amazed the child made it to today which mean scum weren’t reading which makes you the likely scum being offline.

In post 1698, MathBlade wrote:I mean you can try this angle but imho it was pretty obvious. I am amazed the child made it to today which mean scum weren’t reading which makes you the likely scum being offline.

If it was pretty obvious, then you should be able to stste how you knew.