Mafiascum.net

In post 1659, ChaosOmega wrote:

In post 1569, ChaosOmega wrote:It feels like Gamma and Luke are both trying to pull momentum away from Umlaut here.

VOTE: Lukewarm

-----

Also, I'd rather not claim, but there is a reason I had an about-face on Umlaut after N1 and had my vote locked on him all D2.

Guessing it has to do with what Umlaut flipped?

ah yeah, trying to sus you up. by weakly claiming that you're defending him when you weren't, at the time it was obvious that he was going to die. umlaut is more than able to ~sus~ partners, so forgive me for not taking that as clearing.

In post 1676, Datisi wrote:ah yeah, trying to sus you up. by weakly claiming that you're defending him when you weren't, at the time it was obvious that he was going to die. umlaut is more than able to ~sus~ partners, so forgive me for not taking that as clearing.

Not saying you should.

What I am saying is that without knowing your dream a connection is already established from in thread relationships. I can’t discuss what I don’t know.

right. it's a bit out there theory, but. umlaut went no effort shortly after you repped in. i know scumlaut is capable of efforting when he needs to and being a lazy fuck when he can get away with it.

obviously i know you're gonna say "coincidence" which is why i'm hoping others will knock some sense into me.

In post 1678, Datisi wrote:right. it's a bit out there theory, but. umlaut went no effort shortly after you repped in. i know scumlaut is capable of efforting when he needs to and being a lazy fuck when he can get away with it.

obviously i know you're gonna say "coincidence" which is why i'm hoping others will knock some sense into me.

We have time. Let’s get this hashed out. But this argument is in direct contrast to what you said yesterday so like ??? *confused*

gameing

In post 1668, Not_Mafia wrote:Hey Koba, vote Chaos

i cant betray him another time, sorry

In post 1679, MathBlade wrote:But this argument is in direct contrast to what you said yesterday so like ??? *confused*

sorry, what is this apparently contrasting?

In post 1678, Datisi wrote:right. it's a bit out there theory, but. umlaut went no effort shortly after you repped in. i know scumlaut is capable of efforting when he needs to and being a lazy fuck when he can get away with it.

obviously i know you're gonna say "coincidence" which is why i'm hoping others will knock some sense into me.

You said earlier that scum Umlaut was showing no effort when town Umlaut at least tries.

Now you’re saying that Umlaut went no effort despite clearly not getting away with it. Pretty sure being elimmed is the literal “not getting away with it”.

how is this nitpicking helping you solve datisi lol

u look like ur doing busy work LOL

Also im waiting in the juror selection room rn AMA

oh, i see. there's no contradiction there.

when i say "scum!umalut went no effort when town!umlaut at least tries", i meant that in the "being under pressure" sense, this is applicable only during d2. when it was getting clear that the game wants him dead, he went limp and shut up. if he were town there, he would've been trying to convince us not to kill him. that's why i linked that game where he was under pressure as town, he wasn't shutting up.

when i say that i'm concerned about umlaut going no effort on d1, i say that because *at that time of d1*, he wasn't under pressure, nobody was looking in his direction, so he could "afford" to be low effort. obviously my main concern is that the timeline of him going "some effort" into "low-to-no effort" overlaps with you repping in, and i know scum!his effort levels are sometimes negatively correlated with how well his buddies are doing...

also, getting yeeted can very much be "getting away with it" if we now fuck up and lose.

In post 1686, DkKoba wrote:Also im waiting in the juror selection room rn AMA

why is gamma scum :3

Take copious notes prolly. I bet Titus will want to talk to you after the mafia game is done.

Pedit: Let him pick idgaf. I am a notoriously hard sort.

In post 1688, Datisi wrote:

In post 1686, DkKoba wrote:Also im waiting in the juror selection room rn AMA

why is gamma scum :3

cuz im balling
also he flat as a board

In post 1689, MathBlade wrote:Take copious notes prolly. I bet Titus will want to talk to you after the mafia game is done.

Pedit: Let him pick idgaf. I am a notoriously hard sort.

Was talking to YOU nitpicking over datisis comments.
Semantics arguments are boring and im tired of breaking them up - stahp it

In post 1687, Datisi wrote:oh, i see. there's no contradiction there.

when i say "scum!umalut went no effort when town!umlaut at least tries", i meant that in the "being under pressure" sense, this is applicable only during d2. when it was getting clear that the game wants him dead, he went limp and shut up. if he were town there, he would've been trying to convince us not to kill him. that's why i linked that game where he was under pressure as town, he wasn't shutting up.

when i say that i'm concerned about umlaut going no effort on d1, i say that because *at that time of d1*, he wasn't under pressure, nobody was looking in his direction, so he could "afford" to be low effort. obviously my main concern is that the timeline of him going "some effort" into "low-to-no effort" overlaps with you repping in, and i know scum!his effort levels are sometimes negatively correlated with how well his buddies are doing...

also, getting yeeted can very much be "getting away with it" if we now fuck up and lose.

Yeah I think you’re stretching here. Pretty much imho Umlaut was low effort D1 and D2 and your posts yesterday agree with this assertion. I don’t think there is a “some effort” at all.

Also, if I was scum, this is not a “going well” game. Anyone who knows my scum game knows I am extremely good scum. Getting a FoS of any kind means that it would be an incredibly bad game for me if I was scum (which I am not).

Current read list:
{Datisi}
{Koba, Ari, Titus, N_M}
{Alch, Math}
{Gamma, Luke}

In post 1691, DkKoba wrote:

In post 1689, MathBlade wrote:Take copious notes prolly. I bet Titus will want to talk to you after the mafia game is done.

Pedit: Let him pick idgaf. I am a notoriously hard sort.

Was talking to YOU nitpicking over datisis comments.
Semantics arguments are boring and im tired of breaking them up - stahp it

Far as I am concerned Datisi for me is a done solve.

I am pretty sure of Datisi’s alignment he’s just not seeing something I am telling him which is *ugh*

Koba might be scum cuz when they pushed me in LN 233 it at least felt legit, this is just lazy pushing

I believe I already confessed to being lazy this game, not a crazy revelation to have

me : im playing lazy this game
gamma: omg you're being lazy
me: yes

I wanna be lazy Koba. Teach me the ways of the shitpost.

In post 1693, ChaosOmega wrote:Current read list:
{Datisi}
{Koba, Ari, Titus, N_M}
{Alch, Math}
{Gamma, Luke}

Oooh a naked current reads list without any explanation or effort.

Clearly Chaos is town /s