Mafiascum.net

In post 1672, ManateeGal wrote:are you... insulting people on the basis of their negative utility roles

Yes well

This is mafia after all

That's not how engagement's done, manatee.

In post 1672, ManateeGal wrote:are you... insulting people on the basis of their negative utility roles

In post 1670, ManateeGal wrote:

In post 1662, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1657, ManateeGal wrote:i am not set on killing you. following a pattern of how youve been acting now i will be.

There is ZERO chance that you are not set on killing me.

im actively trying to take pause and re-evaluate if i might be wrong about you despite the fact i'll likely get flak for it. if u continue to ignore my attempts to engage with you in a positive way im not gonna be inclined to townread you

I must be blind because I found no attempt to engage with me positively.

In post 1674, Cabd wrote:

In post 1666, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:

In post 1665, Cabd wrote:I was talking about me, lass.

But I know. I don't need any more.

Right but then do you see the problem?

I do absolutely see the problem. But I think I want the dust to settle here first.

Are you caught up yet?

Yes

Of the "DPS" who do you think might be less than legit, here?

Manatee you are literally asking other players permission to kill me. I don't consider that trying to engage me, but trying to enrage me.

In post 1679, Cabd wrote:Of the "DPS" who do you think might be less than legit, here?

Toog, Manatee.

But Manatee is provable. But I think with what I know Manatee is too much as claimed.

In post 1681, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Manatee

You and unwnd both, it seems.

sorry to everyone - i havent been putting my best foot forward and the game has gotten way too overwhelming for me.

btw I highly doubt that manatee is groupscum because if she was she would’ve not claimed about the second vote that she didn’t have to show.

In post 1683, ManateeGal wrote:sorry to everyone - i havent been putting my best foot forward and the game has gotten way too overwhelming for me.

It's not your fault, here. Like... you're fine.

In post 1684, GuyInFreezer wrote:she didn’t have to show.

? Hurt tags are fairly visible.

In post 1684, GuyInFreezer wrote:btw I highly doubt that manatee is groupscum because if she was she would’ve not claimed about the second vote that she didn’t have to show.

I agree with this assessment as well.

In post 1686, Cabd wrote:

In post 1684, GuyInFreezer wrote:she didn’t have to show.

? Hurt tags are fairly visible.

I agree with this, but I think Manatee group scum is... hard to believe.

In post 1686, Cabd wrote:

In post 1684, GuyInFreezer wrote:she didn’t have to show.

? Hurt tags are fairly visible.

She doesn’t have to use that second vote and we would never have known if extra town death was because of her.

Something something ffery something something soft spot for town siding 3P something something.

Groupscum or not, just don't really think Manatee is playing her towngame here.

I know Cabd wanted me to talk more on it, but I'm a lil' tired from life shit.

So uh yeah.

We ejecting Toog yet?

I’m just saying that she is unlikely to be groupscum, is all.

In post 1691, unwnd wrote:a lil' tired from life shit.

Respectable.

Manatee's vote needs to go down before any potential hammers, so that's where we are, I think?

In post 1683, ManateeGal wrote:sorry to everyone - i havent been putting my best foot forward and the game has gotten way too overwhelming for me.

I hope you don't feel that way due to Max Intensity Goofball theater. I am not actually angry... game-angry, yes, but game-angry is always for laughs. Especially after the game.

Just have fun. You can laugh at your bad reads after the game and change your location to "Bad Player Jail."

I think right now this might be the game where my D1 is awful.

That's dependent on how ahem, dangerous the scumteam is. Part of me is still aboard the idea of 2020 but another is cautious.

In post 1690, Cabd wrote:Something something ffery something something soft spot for town siding 3P something something.

it's like you're eavesdropping on our hydra convo

In post 1697, Kate Bishop wrote:

In post 1690, Cabd wrote:Something something ffery something something soft spot for town siding 3P something something.

it's like you're eavesdropping on our hydra convo

It's like I've hydra'd with you for over half a decade spanning 20 games.

Cabd...

What if I wanted to kill Unwnd and Toog?