Page 69 of 72

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 6:57 am
by Albert B. Rampage
I can't go into PT. I'm in a meeting and the green theme of the PT makes it look like I'm goofing off.

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 6:57 am
by Albert B. Rampage
If you don't unvote me now, and somebody hammers and kills both me and a hypothetically town Rubicon, it's on you. This is my final warning.

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 7:03 am
by ika
Albert B. Rampage wrote:If you don't unvote me now, and somebody hammers and kills both me and a hypothetically town Rubicon, it's on you. This is my final warning.


how is it only my fault? how comes its not rubis fault? how comes its nobody else fault?

your threats only want me to vote park even harder

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 7:06 am
by Rubicon
What does L-1 mean exactly? Three votes is 'deadline lynch' minus one, four votes is 'day ending hammer lynch' minus one. I need to know how many people I need to convince to vote you before you get out of your meeting.

ISOs do point to Stigmata acolyte more than Grib acolyte.

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 7:08 am
by Titus
I am treating L minus 1 as deadline lynchminus 1

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 7:18 am
by Rubicon
I am literally the worst target you could have pulled this gambit on, ABR.

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 7:19 am
by Rubicon
Well, short of ika.

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 7:21 am
by Rubicon
For my references, roles currently unaccounted for:

Apprentice
Inquisitor
Jester
Bomber
Spiritualist

Of these, I believe only Apprentice can influence the outcome of the game.

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 7:25 am
by ika
Rubicon wrote:Well, short of ika.


you know in a setup where a fanfic (or any role of such) exist and someone shouts it and im the one who grants it, you basicly telling me to not check you

p-edit: hip claimed bomber
citrus persuado-claimed apprentice

rest were assumed as followed

atum: jest
grib: spirit
ZZZX: inqu

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 7:31 am
by Rubicon
Not sure what you're getting at. I mean, of all the people to 1v1 or threaten to kill as a strategy to stay alive, I am a really unwise choice. You're only worse because threatening to kill you would confirm him as scum.

Where did Citrus claim Apprentice?

I'm trying to go through your plan without assuming these claims are accurate, since there is
some
room for fake claims depending on what roles Atum and Grib were.

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 7:32 am
by ika
Rubicon wrote:Not sure what you're getting at. I mean, of all the people to 1v1 or threaten to kill as a strategy to stay alive, I am a really unwise choice. You're only worse because threatening to kill you would confirm him as scum.

Where did Citrus claim Apprentice?

I'm trying to go through your plan without assuming these claims are accurate, since there is
some
room for fake claims depending on what roles Atum and Grib were.


his iso.

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 7:34 am
by ika
at this point i dont care about whos role is what.

ive already beaten it by mechainc

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 8:18 am
by Rubicon
Unvote


Okay, I went through every possible scenario on your plan, but with Citrus being lynched instead of me because that makes more sense. (Lynching Citrus first is a cop check on him and also catches a hypothetical scum-me in every possible scenario.)

I did find
one
edge case that I think you missed, which could result in a scum win if Angel protection fails. I'm talking to Titus about it privately because I don't want to talk about it publicly just yet.

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 8:19 am
by Rubicon
(And yes, I still think Citrus is town, so that's from a POV of trying to break the game without considering our reads.)

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 8:34 am
by Rubicon
Okay, I think the plan works (as long as Citrus is lynched first).

There is a possible counter, but it's not very likely and we can still win if it happens.

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 8:37 am
by ika
then vote cirtus?

VOTE: cirtus

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 8:43 am
by Rubicon
I realized I missed something. Hold on.

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 8:47 am
by Rubicon
Nvm, still works.

I want Citrus to comment on the plan first, in case he's town and sees something we're missing. Then I'll vote him.

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 8:51 am
by ika
holding back a vote wont change much

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 9:08 am
by Albert B. Rampage
I changed my action in the PT.

VOTE: Citrus

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 9:10 am
by ika
good

VOTE: ABR

now we can do both and be happy

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 9:17 am
by Rubicon
I think doing both today will lose the game if it's hiplop and he manages two kills.

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 9:17 am
by Rubicon
Unless that was a reaction test, in which case, sorry. :P

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 9:25 am
by ika
Rubicon wrote:I think doing both today will lose the game if it's hiplop and he manages two kills.


we have 4 players

me
you
hiplop
stigma

he cant kill 2 people and get away with it b/c agnels protection is garneteed to hit one of the 2.

i have 2 lives and he cant double target me as rules stated.

Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 9:26 am
by ika
seriously rubi its like your triing to piss me off. i have taken ever measure accunatable for each.

the only one that circumstates it is if stigma is final but even then i doubt that