Mafiascum.net

In post 1698, Imperium wrote:

In post 1696, Waco Kid wrote:Fox saying someone else is OMGUS'ing, I'm dying here,


Nobody notice how they avoid the content in favor of a one liner.

What content/context are they avoiding?
I don't think that their point on you is that horrible and avoiding content in favor of a one liner is basically what you did to them (although I guess I could qualify it as a one and a half liner if that made you feel better).

In post 1695, Waco Kid wrote:p-edit: Are you saying you think Camntsuki was actually scum-hunting?

In post 1701, Waco Kid wrote:

In post 1698, Imperium wrote:

In post 1696, Waco Kid wrote:Fox saying someone else is OMGUS'ing, I'm dying here,


Nobody notice how they avoid the content in favor of a one liner.

What content/context are they avoiding?
I don't think that their point on you is that horrible and avoiding content in favor of a one liner is basically what you did to them (although I guess I could qualify it as a one and a half liner if that made you feel better).

Actually it's a pretty weak point given a quick search of my iso would tell you of the people on my wagon I'm OMGUS'ing I was suspicious of many of them prior to them voting me, which negates the point...

In post 1702, kraska77 wrote:

In post 1695, Waco Kid wrote:p-edit: Are you saying you think Camntsuki was actually scum-hunting?

No that's not what I was saying at all. @rest of your post: Are you saying you think things are so clear-cut? Scum's going to pretend to scumhunt too

In post 1707, kraska77 wrote:Keyenhdhdjsn is a townread
I replaced into his slot in a game before (scum slot), he was giving super left field votes over there...his posts were completely offbeat from the context of the thread and his tone was accusatory
I've isod him here and he seems more interactive and sheep-y

In post 1705, Waco Kid wrote:

In post 1702, kraska77 wrote:

In post 1695, Waco Kid wrote:p-edit: Are you saying you think Camntsuki was actually scum-hunting?

No that's not what I was saying at all. @rest of your post: Are you saying you think things are so clear-cut? Scum's going to pretend to scumhunt too

Obviously there's no list of only town things or only scum acts, that's kinda w/e. But there's no town motivation there. "Hey let's lynch an obv town whose active," why is that towny to you?

In post 1707, kraska77 wrote:Keyenhdhdjsn is a townread
I replaced into his slot in a game before (scum slot), he was giving super left field votes over there...his posts were completely offbeat from the context of the thread and his tone was accusatory
I've isod him here and he seems more interactive and sheep-y

In post 296, Fox McCloud wrote:

In post 256, Waco Kid wrote:

In post 237, Grib wrote:

In post 144, kdowns wrote:

In post 101, Waco Kid wrote:@Kdowns, thoughts on Diamond and Grib?

DS, threw me off at first with trying to get people to out NU roles but later says that we have no Night Actions or Role claims to even begin to attempt to grab any discussion. Which in my head is throwing off red flags because why as early as Day 1 do we need to have anyone make any claims to even begin discussion on who is scummy or not. Just DS' general actions so far in this game are reading more Scum than anything. Especially after getting on to Grib for not wanting to RVS and then claiming to be Facetous after people start to get onto him.

Grib, from what I've read so far just seems to be defending himself from DS' attacks onto him for not wanting to RVS.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: DS

Hey Waco, why did you single out kdowns specifically? And what are your impressions of his response to you?

I singled him out because he had like 3-4 posts prior to that which said absolute zero, so I wanted to force him to do something. See below quote

In post 216, Waco Kid wrote:

In post 209, farside22 wrote:Reread a few things.

Vote kdowns

His reason for voting reads a bit more wordy then is needed.

I concur, although I read it a bit differently. 1) I kinda felt like he was just trying to find a reason that sounded different to make the vote, and 2) He really took a narrow view on the question, in a way that kinda shut down further discussion than encouraged.

VOTE: kdowns

p-edit: What does != x mean?

:I

I'm kind of sad you didn't give your OWN thoughts on his response and instead jumped on someone else's.

Buuut I also agree that the DS read was words words words. Hrm.

Eh, what?? Read the damn post Grib. I concurred with the end read, but I pretty clearly stated my reasons for agreeing were different than what farside had stated.

If you want a post that seems more sheepy and doesn't fully explain, look below.

In post 239, keyenpeydee wrote:

In post 216, Waco Kid wrote:

In post 209, farside22 wrote:Reread a few things.

Vote kdowns

His reason for voting reads a bit more wordy then is needed.

I concur, although I read it a bit differently. 1) I kinda felt like he was just trying to find a reason that sounded different to make the vote, and 2) He really took a narrow view on the question, in a way that kinda shut down further discussion than encouraged.

VOTE: kdowns

p-edit: What does != x mean?

Just read kdowns post and I decided to vote for him too because I agree in this post. Although DS is still on my suspicion list. And I think kdown just really felt like he really just came up with a reason and tries to increase DS' votes. And its really looks like words.

UNVOTE: DS
VOTE: Kdowns for above reasons.

this post

the whole "sheepings not scummy look at keyen he did it too" feels really deflective
and im not a fan of the kdowns push to begin with

In post 1646, Spiffeh wrote:Guys Cephrir is scummy who's with me?

In post 1670, Imperium wrote:

In post 1519, SnarkySnowman wrote:VOTE: kdowns

Why are you tunneling him so hard?

Farside,
Snarky is lock town to you because of this post?

In post 1673, Waco Kid wrote:@Imperium:

Honestly, one of the reasons I think MoI is pretty towny is because he's actually explaining out his reads a bit.

Which contrasts pretty hard with my dislike for hiplop who been a whole lot of nothing and naked votes

In post 1712, Fox McCloud wrote:Kraska's probably town

-Luna

In post 1677, Waco Kid wrote:For Broseiden: I don't think scum posts #1443, but so much of the rest of his iso is just sillyness, rage and AtE

p-edit: No, there aren't enough people posting explanations to do that, haha. I mention it for MoI, because I feel like his posts stand out from the pack in this

In post 1683, Imperium wrote:

In post 1541, MagnaofIllusion wrote:You supposed distain for shit-slinging peaks my interest given that you aren’t knocking either Camnt or Bro who personify that particular brand of posting.

You kind of answer your own question here; Katsuki and BRO are occasionally (not always, but occasionally) personifications of shit-slinging; as a result, I'm not particularly inclined to spend my time trying to convince them to stop.

In post 1396, Transcend wrote: Scum claim.

In post 1599, DiamondSentinel wrote:It doesn't matter what others were/are doing. The point is that Camnsuki took it to a level far beyond any sort of ignorable level.

In post 1637, Spiffeh wrote:

In post 128, keyenpeydee wrote:

In post 126, Cheetory6 wrote:Don't be sorry.
Unless you're a top secret alt pretending to be new.
Then you should be sorry.

What?! Excuse me, No. And if all of you really don't like to play with me just because I am a 'newbie' then I can be replaced. Because it looks like that all of you don't want to play with me.

Mafia scum people really are terrifying. This is why I don't want to play here. Can y'all be more friendly?

Never lynching this

In post 1678, Cephrir wrote:I think you're townreading MOI for being MOI.

He writes a lot of words but I think those words kind of suck