Mafiascum.net

Her sussing of me felt really opportunistic. Glitch brought it up and dgb just clung to it like she was gonna die if she let go.

Feels off considering she cant actually provide a case on me.

In post 1695, Fidget wrote:

In post 347, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 344, Pickaxe Pete wrote:277 comes from an informed perspective

You mean informed about your slot? I don't even understand why you'd say this.

In post 362, Fidget wrote:VOTE: Pickaxe Pete

that makes no fucking sense for someone trying to solve honestly

He's sheeping that weird argument on shelly earlier but the argument is related to his shelly knowing stuff about HIS slot.

Surely he is just looking for reasons to attack on shelly so he can be justified in voting her, this makes no sense as an honest case

Sorry to bring up ancient history at this point, but WHY did you never respond to this, Pete? I only asked about it like 500 times.

I only ask because I'm teetering between both wagons

When I repped in I picked a page to begin a review from and started in. I knew Leia had been replaced (it's right there on page 12 where I started, in fact the post above Shelly's), and I suppose I should have known that I was the replacement, but for whatever reason I didn't put that together. It doesn't really matter though. The post Shelly made sounded like she was informed somehow. It makes me look scummy the way I approached it, but I was looking for scum and that struck me right off. I should have read on a bit for context I suppose. I didn't respond because it's a convoluted response and it sounds like I'm lying. And I think I had pressure on me at the time and didn't want the extra and just hoped it would go away.

In post 1702, Pickaxe Pete wrote:

In post 1695, Fidget wrote:

In post 347, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 344, Pickaxe Pete wrote:277 comes from an informed perspective

You mean informed about your slot? I don't even understand why you'd say this.

In post 362, Fidget wrote:VOTE: Pickaxe Pete

that makes no fucking sense for someone trying to solve honestly

He's sheeping that weird argument on shelly earlier but the argument is related to his shelly knowing stuff about HIS slot.

Surely he is just looking for reasons to attack on shelly so he can be justified in voting her, this makes no sense as an honest case

Sorry to bring up ancient history at this point, but WHY did you never respond to this, Pete? I only asked about it like 500 times.

I only ask because I'm teetering between both wagons

When I repped in I picked a page to begin a review from and started in. I knew Leia had been replaced (it's right there on page 12 where I started, in fact the post above Shelly's), and I suppose I should have known that I was the replacement, but for whatever reason I didn't put that together. It doesn't really matter though. The post Shelly made sounded like she was informed somehow. It makes me look scummy the way I approached it, but I was looking for scum and that struck me right off. I should have read on a bit for context I suppose. I didn't respond because it's a convoluted response and it sounds like I'm lying. And I think I had pressure on me at the time and didn't want the extra and just hoped it would go away.

FWIW in my head at the time I was thinking someone else had been replaced. I didn't realize my slot had been the only replaced slot.

In post 1694, Fidget wrote:Pickaxe means 1687 and 1688, I believe.

I interpreted them as meaning you were suspecting DGB, but you are thinking about suspecting her less cause she's suspicious of Pete.

This is correct. I wasn't clear.

Noraa wrote:Feels off considering she cant actually provide a case on me.

I feel like if I put my mind to it, I could make a case on you. That is probably true for most people here. You play very inconsistent and use a lot of far out logic which is easy to spin as scummy.

Regarding the opportunism point, maybe I guess? Why do you think scum!DPG feels the need to try and get you eliminated right now over everyone else?

DPG seems to pretty consistently find "sucking up" scummy. Even if it's me jokingly at Titus. You outright buddying tayl0r was not going to go well.

In post 1700, Noraa wrote:Her sussing of me felt really opportunistic. Glitch brought it up and dgb just clung to it like she was gonna die if she let go.

I was gonna die if I didn't let go?

Am I voting you now?

In post 1701, Noraa wrote:Feels off considering she cant actually provide a case on me.

But I did provide a case that several players agreed with.

Are we reading the same game?

You seem inordinately nervous about an extraordinarily remote chance of being eliminated.

I bet you're not worried about being NK 'd

When this game is over... I am afraid we'll regret letting the Noraa wagon disintegrate.

I second the shame it is that Noraa got off the hook so easily here. I caught up. Happy with my vote on Nos. I don't get directly scummy vibes from Pete but I do from Nos. And that vote on Pete is just self preservation from Nos.

In post 1689, Marashu wrote:Lunch break post, so this will be a quick one (I can explain myself in about 4h) but I don't want it to come to random. If Glitch isn't happening, my compromise is Pete.

VOTE: Pickaxe Pete

6 hours later...

In post 1705, Fidget wrote:

Noraa wrote:Feels off considering she cant actually provide a case on me.

I feel like if I put my mind to it, I could make a case on you. That is probably true for most people here. You play very inconsistent and use a lot of far out logic which is easy to spin as scummy.

Regarding the opportunism point, maybe I guess? Why do you think scum!DPG feels the need to try and get you eliminated right now over everyone else?

DPG seems to pretty consistently find "sucking up" scummy. Even if it's me jokingly at Titus. You outright buddying tayl0r was not going to go well.

its definitely easy to make a case on me, I agree.

I'm easy LHF. whether or not I'm the biggest wagon, everyone knows getting me limmed is easy .... especially scum. I also saw that but the thing is that DGP's case on me has basically nothing to do with "sucking up"/buddying if I remember right.

In post 1500, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1474, Glitch wrote:Would scumNoraa treat TS this way?

Take away all the unctuous grovelling, what you have left is a player that declares renouncing all responsibility for her reads, her play, and her votes, and putting it all in the hands of another player that she swears is town.

Only scum is ever this certain another player is town.

A player whose scumread she might fear.

Furthermore, how can one find Noraa's votes scummy without finding Tayl0r's votes scummy, since Noraa's votes are completely dependent on Tayl0r's?

If Tayl0r makes a bad vote, a bad move, who do you punish? Certainly not Noraa, she's just copying.

You'd have to punish Tayl0r, who would be the townie, and spare Noraa, who would be the scum.

Right?

In post 1711, Noraa wrote:

In post 1705, Fidget wrote:

Noraa wrote:Feels off considering she cant actually provide a case on me.

I feel like if I put my mind to it, I could make a case on you. That is probably true for most people here. You play very inconsistent and use a lot of far out logic which is easy to spin as scummy.

Regarding the opportunism point, maybe I guess? Why do you think scum!DPG feels the need to try and get you eliminated right now over everyone else?

DPG seems to pretty consistently find "sucking up" scummy. Even if it's me jokingly at Titus. You outright buddying tayl0r was not going to go well.

its definitely easy to make a case on me, I agree.

I'm easy LHF. whether or not I'm the biggest wagon, everyone knows getting me limmed is easy .... especially scum. I also saw that but the thing is that DGP's case on me has basically nothing to do with "sucking up"/buddying if I remember right.

You not moving to Nosferatu makes you a member of the informed minority.

In post 1710, Titus wrote:

In post 1689, Marashu wrote:Lunch break post, so this will be a quick one (I can explain myself in about 4h) but I don't want it to come to random. If Glitch isn't happening, my compromise is Pete.

VOTE: Pickaxe Pete

6 hours later...

I'm here. I'm catching up.

This is what we got so far, 7 hours left on the clock:

Pickaxe Pete Princess Leia (4)Titus;Tayl0r Swift;DrippingGoofball;Nosferatu;Marashu
Nosferatu (4)Fidget;Gypyx;Pickaxe Pete;Glitch
GlitchEddieFenix(1)Noraa;
Titus (1)Vecna;
Noraa RedPanda Saudade (0);

Who is online? Can we make Noraa happen?

how many does it take to yeet? I think I'm leaning Pete tho one of my solid TRs(fidget) is on nos so thats making me think twice

Pickaxe Pete is at 5.

In post 1715, DrippingGoofball wrote:This is what we got so far, 7 hours left on the clock:

Pickaxe Pete Princess Leia (4)Titus;Tayl0r Swift;DrippingGoofball;Nosferatu;Marashu
Nosferatu (4)Fidget;Gypyx;Pickaxe Pete;Glitch
GlitchEddieFenix(1)Noraa;
Titus (1)Vecna;
Noraa RedPanda Saudade (0);

Who is online? Can we make Noraa happen?

I am not switching to Noraa while Nos is in danger.

I have 5, yes.

I would vote Noraa.

In post 1716, Noraa wrote:how many does it take to yeet? I think I'm leaning Pete tho one of my solid TRs(fidget) is on nos so thats making me think twice

Take a stand.

Lets do it. I like that better any way.

VOTE: Noraa

I also immediately have more SR vibes from TS but can't explain as it involves ongoing games. I'll case her isolated to this game after we flip someone if it still makes sense to do so.

In post 1718, Titus wrote:

In post 1715, DrippingGoofball wrote:This is what we got so far, 7 hours left on the clock:

Pickaxe Pete Princess Leia (4)Titus;Tayl0r Swift;DrippingGoofball;Nosferatu;Marashu
Nosferatu (4)Fidget;Gypyx;Pickaxe Pete;Glitch
GlitchEddieFenix(1)Noraa;
Titus (1)Vecna;
Noraa RedPanda Saudade (0);

Who is online? Can we make Noraa happen?

I am not switching to Noraa while Nos is in danger.

I unvoted Nos. Pete says he will vote Noraa. That's 2 off of Nos. Vote Noraa with us and let's end this now