Mafiascum.net

VOTE: BEF

I think Aris is being honest here tbh.
Let's yeet the pufferfish.

In post 1699, TheGoldenParadox wrote:

In post 1685, shellyc wrote:GTH ari

you do not get to treat ari like this

Why post this now

In post 1701, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1699, TheGoldenParadox wrote:

In post 1685, shellyc wrote:GTH ari

you do not get to treat ari like this

Why post this now

what

In post 1698, Aristophanes wrote:White Knighted??
I've never heard "Warlocked" here

yeah not sure it was the right term, I feel like white knighting implies you're town tho kinda? which doesn't work for what I was saying

I think I'm okay with a puffer wagon VOTE: bef

BEF!scum would have decided on this very bold playstyle where they basically stick up to people's interests (such as untunnelling me). most people posting are town. BEF!scum also loses out on cred and draws attention to themselves doing it. i cant really see this from a scum!pov

In post 1704, shellyc wrote:BEF!scum also loses out on cred and draws attention to themselves doing it. i cant really see this from a scum!pov

aren't you saying they gained credibility in your eyes instead of lost it then?

In post 1705, samantha97 wrote:aren't you saying they gained credibility in your eyes instead of lost it then?

yes but its not very townie to blatantly sheep/whiteknight isn't it

the cred i give is based off too scummy to be scum, not the action itself

In post 1706, shellyc wrote:

In post 1705, samantha97 wrote:aren't you saying they gained credibility in your eyes instead of lost it then?

yes but its not very townie to blatantly sheep/whiteknight isn't it

the cred i give is based off too scummy to be scum, not the action itself

A double negative.

Scum regardless of role pm.

In post 1702, TheGoldenParadox wrote:

In post 1701, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1699, TheGoldenParadox wrote:

In post 1685, shellyc wrote:GTH ari

you do not get to treat ari like this

Why post this now

what

Ari has been pushed for a while

In post 1706, shellyc wrote:

In post 1705, samantha97 wrote:aren't you saying they gained credibility in your eyes instead of lost it then?

yes but its not very townie to blatantly sheep/whiteknight isn't it

the cred i give is based off too scummy to be scum, not the action itself

I think I have probably been too obvtown that the WIFOM enthusiasts can't let it go.

In post 1704, shellyc wrote:BEF!scum would have decided on this very bold playstyle where they basically stick up to people's interests (such as untunnelling me). most people posting are town. BEF!scum also loses out on cred and draws attention to themselves doing it. i cant really see this from a scum!pov

maybe but is his play indicative of a town pov? again for me that's the most important thing, he could just have a funky 3p role. Until it feels like he's playing naturally and is visibly town it's better to treat him as scum maybe? I think I'd be more convinced by a "he's town because X" argument rather than a "he's not groupscum because he's too scummy to be groupscum" which is just a weak argument (not that those are your exact words but it seems like the principle you're working from)

In post 1711, BrightEyedFish wrote:I think I have probably been too obvtown that the WIFOM enthusiasts can't let it go.

what have you done that's obvtown fypov?

In post 1713, Happy Unbirthday Boon wrote:

In post 1711, BrightEyedFish wrote:I think I have probably been too obvtown that the WIFOM enthusiasts can't let it go.

what have you done that's obvtown fypov?

I guess the most obvious thing for people not thinking like Shelley was me immediately putting the Vax wagon back to F-1. Scum would have been pretty reckless to put a partner back to F-1 so quickly without at least giving a chance for the wagon to dismantle.

EBWOP

The wording about shelley there is a little weird. I am not suggesting that Shelley is "not thinking". I meant it as in other people "not thinking" about my slot for the same reasons as shelley is.

I mean Vax refused to claim, for all we know it was a planned bus. If anything Vax was going down so hard it almost feels more like you were trying to force yourself to get on before any more town got on so you'd make sure you had cred and wagon positioning for VCA later

In post 1716, Happy Unbirthday Boon wrote:I mean Vax refused to claim, for all we know it was a planned bus. If anything Vax was going down so hard it almost feels more like you were trying to force yourself to get on before any more town got on so you'd make sure you had cred and wagon positioning for VCA later

Then why wouldn't I have just hammered before Gyp made that unvote after my intent?

idk, didn't feel like it? Do you want to quote the posts you're thinking of and walk me through why you think you definitely hammer there as scum?

In post 823, BrightEyedFish wrote:

Intent to hammer

In post 827, Gypyx wrote:UNVOTE:

Giving time to TBP to make their post

In post 828, BrightEyedFish wrote:

In post 824, The Pelican Brief wrote:Hey hey hey
I want vax to answer my analysis.
I also have a few things to say to people but I got morning classes.

Can we at least give this day to solve and talk more? I'm talking like 12 hours.

I unvoted with Titus to help do a sorting exercise reaction test but I also don't trust many slots with the hammer. (Tbf I don't really trust anyone with a hammer in games but)

I am just too used to from rushed day ends and lolhammers.

~Taly phone posting with no bold at 5:35 AM

I won't hammer unless Vax refuses to claim in his next post.

In post 829, BrightEyedFish wrote:VOTE: vaxkiller

Nope, got to keep the F-1 pressure on.

I can't remember for sure but I am pretty certain I wrote 828 before reading Gyp's 827.

Yeah BEF has a real point here

Maybe we should lynch Gypyx?

Or Bell?

Golden, why is Gypyx town?