Mafiascum.net

In post 1665, Guillotina wrote:

In post 1594, Infinity 324 wrote:

In post 1590, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1589, Infinity 324 wrote:Was town before, but stopped being towny towards the end of the day which worries me.

What was not Townie by the end of the day?

His aggression and sorting from earlier in the day turned into a very forgettable presence

. It felt like he was

saying stuff just to say it

. The progression on horse, from thinking she said some towny stuff to going back to scumreading her didn’t feel

particularly genuine

. The response to flea’s case felt...

not as flippant as I expected

. The case was bad enough imo that I think most would be really frustrated by it as town and

guillo instead seemed to give more validity to the case than it had

.

Ok! I'm at home, let's do this!

1) I was the second highest poster on D1 (i think) where I scumhunted and push the slots that seemed the most suspicious to me. I was very far from being a forgettable presence!
2) I never say stuff just to say it as either alignment, I was split between my logical side scum reading Horsewoman and my heart side townreading her and that manifested in my hesitation to cast a final vote on her in various occasions. I ended up casting it on her because in my opinion she failed to town up, I don't know the reasons she had, she did say she was going through a mental breakdown (paraphrase) but I thought it was AtE. If I would have yeeted Tangeloo instead of Horsewoman if such wagon was possible but we all know that would have been a misyeet as well.
3) Flea's long wall post was ill intended and it was obvious that they were trying to provoke me, I tried to keep it respectful but I'm no goddamn saint, it pissed me off and I acted reacted accordingly. You say it was not as flippant as you expected and I say,

what do you know about me to have expectations about my behavior as a person?

And since when being allegedly disrespectful to someone is alignment indicative?
4) We all (except mafia) are trying scum hunt to solve the game to win. To me, everyone has validity, their opinions matter whether they are wrong or right, bad or good, because those inputs will help us solve the game. So I don't like it when you say that I seemed to give more validity to Flea's case than it had, it was valid for me and I had to address it. How is that bad eh?

In post 1699, Guillotina wrote:

In post 1697, Momrangal wrote:

In post 1695, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 1644, Momrangal wrote:I want a claim from Mark.

Then thoughts on who he thinks should go next and why. I'll either agree, or pick the next target myself

We shouldn’t be mass-claiming as it doesn’t benefit Town

The snowball has already started rolling.


We have too much information out in the open for scum to use, but not enough for town to utilize effectively

Such as what? Two flipped towns, an unconfirmed mason claim and a vigi claim?

The town protective role here is more important than those claims. He/she saved a life and in exchange her life must be protected.

In post 1699, Guillotina wrote:Such as what? Two flipped towns, an unconfirmed mason claim and a vigi claim?

In post 1698, Momrangal wrote:It's also a mass claim that is controlled, scum can't get their hands on the order

In post 1701, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 1699, Guillotina wrote:

In post 1697, Momrangal wrote:

In post 1695, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 1644, Momrangal wrote:I want a claim from Mark.

Then thoughts on who he thinks should go next and why. I'll either agree, or pick the next target myself

We shouldn’t be mass-claiming as it doesn’t benefit Town

The snowball has already started rolling.


We have too much information out in the open for scum to use, but not enough for town to utilize effectively

Such as what? Two flipped towns, an unconfirmed mason claim and a vigi claim?

The town protective role here is more important than those claims. He/she saved a life and in exchange her life must be protected.

Did you just scum slip with “her”

In post 1691, Momrangal wrote:

In post 1654, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1651, Infinity 324 wrote:If we're gonna massclaim, do we want to wait to out the protective? That at least makes it harder for scum to pick off PRs.

If the protective protected the Mason, that player should claim VT.

Covered

In post 1646, Guillotina wrote:

In post 1628, Noraa wrote:Im not suspicious of you. My reason to TR you is gone and now you are a null.

What reason was that? Elaborate please.

In post 1704, Flea The Magician wrote:I still disagree. and I'm loving guillo's defence of himself here.

In post 1705, Infinity 324 wrote:Guillo, we’re literally telling the protective not to claim. Can we just listen to the mason?

In post 1651, Infinity 324 wrote:If we're gonna massclaim, do we want to wait to out the protective? That at least makes it harder for scum to pick off PRs.

In post 1700, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 1665, Guillotina wrote:

In post 1594, Infinity 324 wrote:

In post 1590, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1589, Infinity 324 wrote:Was town before, but stopped being towny towards the end of the day which worries me.

What was not Townie by the end of the day?

His aggression and sorting from earlier in the day turned into a very forgettable presence

. It felt like he was

saying stuff just to say it

. The progression on horse, from thinking she said some towny stuff to going back to scumreading her didn’t feel

particularly genuine

. The response to flea’s case felt...

not as flippant as I expected

. The case was bad enough imo that I think most would be really frustrated by it as town and

guillo instead seemed to give more validity to the case than it had

.

Ok! I'm at home, let's do this!

1) I was the second highest poster on D1 (i think) where I scumhunted and push the slots that seemed the most suspicious to me. I was very far from being a forgettable presence!
2) I never say stuff just to say it as either alignment, I was split between my logical side scum reading Horsewoman and my heart side townreading her and that manifested in my hesitation to cast a final vote on her in various occasions. I ended up casting it on her because in my opinion she failed to town up, I don't know the reasons she had, she did say she was going through a mental breakdown (paraphrase) but I thought it was AtE. If I would have yeeted Tangeloo instead of Horsewoman if such wagon was possible but we all know that would have been a misyeet as well.
3) Flea's long wall post was ill intended and it was obvious that they were trying to provoke me, I tried to keep it respectful but I'm no goddamn saint, it pissed me off and I acted reacted accordingly. You say it was not as flippant as you expected and I say,

what do you know about me to have expectations about my behavior as a person?

And since when being allegedly disrespectful to someone is alignment indicative?
4) We all (except mafia) are trying scum hunt to solve the game to win. To me, everyone has validity, their opinions matter whether they are wrong or right, bad or good, because those inputs will help us solve the game. So I don't like it when you say that I seemed to give more validity to Flea's case than it had, it was valid for me and I had to address it. How is that bad eh?

1. Post count means nothing, at all. And just because you have a high post count doesn’t mean your posts hold any weight in people’s heads, thus can be forgettable.

2. That was a very complicated way to say you were fence sitting on them and chose they were more likely scum than town.

3. No comments

4. The first sentence screams LAMIST but is probably NAI.

In post 1711, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 1705, Infinity 324 wrote:Guillo, we’re literally telling the protective not to claim. Can we just listen to the mason?

That’s counter intuitive, the reason we’re massclaiming is to find the missing kill. If protective doesn’t claim what’s thenpoint

In post 1712, Noraa wrote:

In post 1651, Infinity 324 wrote:If we're gonna massclaim, do we want to wait to out the protective? That at least makes it harder for scum to pick off PRs.

its day two. STOP. We are NOT massclaiming.

In post 1673, Flea The Magician wrote:

Also can we not bring mental disorders into this as an attack, much thanks

In post 1714, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1711, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 1705, Infinity 324 wrote:Guillo, we’re literally telling the protective not to claim. Can we just listen to the mason?

That’s counter intuitive, the reason we’re massclaiming is to find the missing kill. If protective doesn’t claim what’s thenpoint

That’s not why we’re mass claiming. Look at the subtext

In post 1705, Infinity 324 wrote:Guillo, we’re literally telling the protective not to claim. Can we just listen to the mason?

In post 1687, Momrangal wrote:

In post 1683, Momrangal wrote:VOTE: Guillotina

I want a claim and I'm getting it one way or another

We already have more information out than is typical for a day two.

We have a flipped townie,
Claimed townie
Claimed mason
And a claimed VT

We have people claiming information and we have a missing kill.

Instead of having town wifoms itself into oblivion, were going to force scum to play their hand and open up the game

In post 1687, Momrangal wrote:

In post 1683, Momrangal wrote:VOTE: Guillotina

I want a claim and I'm getting it one way or another

We already have more information out than is typical for a day two.

We have a flipped townie,
Claimed townie
Claimed mason
And a claimed VT

We have people claiming information and we have a missing kill.

Instead of having town wifoms itself into oblivion, were going to force scum to play their hand and open up the game

In post 1711, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 1705, Infinity 324 wrote:Guillo, we’re literally telling the protective not to claim. Can we just listen to the mason?

That’s counter intuitive, the reason we’re massclaiming is to find the missing kill. If protective doesn’t claim what’s thenpoint

In post 1722, Guillotina wrote:

In post 1711, JacksonVirgo wrote:

In post 1705, Infinity 324 wrote:Guillo, we’re literally telling the protective not to claim. Can we just listen to the mason?

That’s counter intuitive, the reason we’re massclaiming is to find the missing kill. If protective doesn’t claim what’s thenpoint

Exactly! As far as I know, Masons are just VTs that share a room, so how do you expect to figure out the missing kill without the protective claim?

In post 1721, Noraa wrote:Ok I'm caught up. Mom not dying night 1 is just weird. I think I definitely would like the mason buddy to confirm. I don't have a read on mom and them not dying last night is really weird.