https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
whatevrIn post 1696, Almost50 wrote:I did. I gave you a full solve already.In post 1686, tris wrote:it is now d3. anything you want to share?In post 590, Almost50 wrote:Btw, IF there's a Vig; please don't shoot me. Let Scum strive and struggle for this one. It'd be most beneficial to town if I do live to -say- D3.
Not a crumb. Definitely not a crumb.
I did. It was over only 2 posts:In post 1691, bugspray wrote:almost50 i think your theory is pretty solid but can you put it all together in one big post? it's hard to follow in multuple posts over three pages
if we can communicate the idea better we can proibabyl convince mathblade
In post 1643, Almost50 wrote:
It was a moment of revelation. I started by doing the undoable. The one thing I've been criticizing mastina for doing. A GROUP'S ANALYSIS.
I made quite a few assumptions though (that totally defy the mod's declared intention of messing with us)
One was lendunistus is Town from today's grouping. lendunistus' vote is hammer unless both groups vote for the same slot. If I was a mod I'd still give control over the hammer to Town as long as Town are the majority. It doesn't make much sense to give that to scum here. (That is precisely what the mod said he might do. I don't believe him tbh).
To be followed
I also very much appreciate the nice gesture, considering you are part of my solve.In post 1645, Almost50 wrote:Second assumption was: G1 on D2 (of 13 slots) was composed as a 13 players Normal setup. i.e. 10:3. This meant only 1 Scum on Auro/tris/Anya/OutWolrdER
Third assumption: G1 on D1 contained 1 Scum at max. Probably none. This gives Scum more weight to control the smaller groups.
Then I went further with my fantasies and theorized NONE was more likely than one. That way 1 scum in each of G2/G3/G4 and 1 in Flea/T3 gives Scum maximum control over the eventual voting, but still leaves Town in control overall.
Are you fillowing? I bet you got lost already.
1 Scum in lend/Out, with lend esyablished as Town (and flowtrap flipping Town) = Out is SCUM. That makes Auro/Tris/Anya all Town.
As if that wasn't enough moon!logic, I decided to toss in some arbitrary VCA as well. Just a little touch though..
mastina/bugs/Randy containing 1 Scum, and bugs was the one voting flow trap at the end of D1. Granted that didn't even count, but he was also voting momrangel before, so I picked him for the Scum in that group. That makes mastina/Randy Town AND Moz as well (as bugs is tunneling Moz iirc). Moz Town makes Vax Scum.
Back to today's grouping, Flea is with both Vax & Out in G1, so T3 is the Scum between the two (that is another implicit assumption that both groups are 5:2 today... the closest to a Normal setting)
And with that hilarious piece of wisdom I concluded my research and decided I got the solution already, and can proceed with a clear conscience
There’s something in particular I am looking for from Mastina, Anya, and TsuIn post 1699, tris wrote:anya was only an implied claim. and with anya, it's hard to know if that was serious.In post 1694, MathBlade wrote:I am gonna sit back a bit.In post 1689, tris wrote:@math: the reason t3 said "My theory was that all prs are mailmen." was because yesterday, he said he had a setup spec reason to believe that vfp's claim of simple doctor was wrong. he obviously doesn't believe in that theory anymore
Can someone consolidate claims?
Anya mailmen
Mastina mason
It’s just so much easier when I don’t have to hunt for everything.
mastina claimed mason right at the start. who knows if that's serious
ftfyIn post 1645, Almost50 wrote:Second assumption was: G1 on D2 (of 13 slots) was composed as a 13 players Normal setup. i.e. 10:3. This meant only 1 Scum on Auro/tris/Anya/OutWolrdER
Third assumption: G1 on D1 contained 1 Scum at max. Probably none. This gives Scum more weight to control the smaller groups.
Then I went further with my fantasies and theorized NONE was more likely than one. That way 1 scum in each of G2/G3/G4 and 1 in Flea/T3 gives Scum maximum control over the eventual voting, but still leaves Town in control overall.
Are you fillowing? I bet you got lost already.
1 Scum in lend/Out, with lend esyablished as Town (and flowtrap flipping Town) = Out is SCUM. That makes Auro/Tris/Anya all Town.
As if that wasn't enough moon!logic, I decided to toss in some arbitrary VCA as well. Just a little touch though..
mastina/bugs/Randy containing 1 Scum, and bugs was the one voting flow trap at the end of D1. Granted that didn't even count, but they were also voting momrangel before, so I picked them for the Scum in that group. That makes mastina/Randy Town AND Moz as well (as bugs is tunneling Moz iirc). Moz Town makes Vax Scum.
Back to today's grouping, Flea is with both Vax & Out in G1, so T3 is the Scum between the two (that is another implicit assumption that both groups are 5:2 today... the closest to a Normal setting)
And with that hilarious piece of wisdom I concluded my research and decided I got the solution already, and can proceed with a clear conscience
It's definitely possible.In post 1623, mozamis wrote:could be why Xtotm died. Fits.In post 1512, Xtoxm wrote:auro is lockscum
I mean it definitely fits with you being scum who think Xtoxm+mastina = masons as that's something you've a strong inclination towards hunting for, but that doesn't do your slot many favors.In post 1625, MathBlade wrote:I think this locks Mastina as a mason imho.
I mean:In post 1626, mozamis wrote:Anyone town in group 2 PLEAS BE CAREFUL HOW YOU VOTE/DONT VOTE. Potentially most scum in group two, plus Len could quick hammer. I'm assuming most/all my group are town.
My group has bugspray (almost certainly scum), Auro (decent chance of being scum), MathBlade (reasonable chance of being scum), and two names that while I don't think they're scum, could potentially be scum even if I don't currently think they are (Almost50, T3). Literally the only name I trust to be town is Gypyx in the group, so you're not wrong.In post 1619, schadd_ wrote:
I think this makes T3 town and I can see exactly why T3 would have that theory (it's not an unreasonable one to have). It was wrong, but the belief in it being right I think makes T3 town here.In post 1650, T3 wrote:My theory was that all prs are mailmen.
No, I was blocked by an odd-night Alien who was also a Messenger. They are not Momrangal; I know this for a fact now. So this game had Momrangal as a messenger-jailkeeper and a separate player who is an oddnight-messenger-alien.In post 1669, MathBlade wrote:It’s likely with the mason claim Mom visited Mastina and blocked her
Can? Yes.In post 1671, MathBlade wrote:Mastina can you please explain?
Funny because this should be EXACTLY like that game to you.In post 1710, mastina wrote:Can? Yes.In post 1671, MathBlade wrote:Mastina can you please explain?
Will? No.
I have a visiting power; I am conftown; I will say no more than that and if scum wanna kill me N3 and run the risk of it failing due to the oddnight alien that's their prerogative.
(Also, I forgot to do this before, meant to do this in my first post of the day, I am rather bad at it, BUT: I am giving you similar leeway to Gypyx's game, as in, I was scumreading your predecessor and am giving you some amount of space. But this game you definitely aren't feeling as immediately town to me as you did that game, will say that.)
This is not a question that I see any protown reason to answer at this time.In post 1708, MathBlade wrote:You said you are a mason. Is this correct? Yes or No.
Yes, but I know for a fact that N1, I was roleblocked. Given that I know I was roleblocked N1 and that I received a message from someone saying they're an odd-night Alien who targeted me N1, and that Aliens roleblock their target, this checks out.In post 1708, MathBlade wrote:You said you targeted someone with a power. Is this correct? Yes or No.
I did receive a letter N1. I have stated the contents of the letter. It was NOT from Momrangal; I don't see reason to specify further, given that the sender of the message is, explicitly, a very strong power role whose claim I can at least half-verify. (They claimed to target me with an action that blocks me, I was blocked N1, so at the very least the roleblocking half of the oddnight alien claim is confirmed.)In post 1708, MathBlade wrote:You said you received a letter. Is this correct? If so yes or no and what did it contain and who from?
No, I have not.In post 1708, MathBlade wrote:And lastly have you watched any you tube or musicals recently?
I think you or this alien are scum due to the one too many PRs problem.In post 1712, mastina wrote:This is not a question that I see any protown reason to answer at this time.In post 1708, MathBlade wrote:You said you are a mason. Is this correct? Yes or No.
Yes, but I know for a fact that N1, I was roleblocked. Given that I know I was roleblocked N1 and that I received a message from someone saying they're an odd-night Alien who targeted me N1, and that Aliens roleblock their target, this checks out.In post 1708, MathBlade wrote:You said you targeted someone with a power. Is this correct? Yes or No.
I did receive a letter N1. I have stated the contents of the letter. It was NOT from Momrangal; I don't see reason to specify further, given that the sender of the message is, explicitly, a very strong power role whose claim I can at least half-verify. (They claimed to target me with an action that blocks me, I was blocked N1, so at the very least the roleblocking half of the oddnight alien claim is confirmed.)In post 1708, MathBlade wrote:You said you received a letter. Is this correct? If so yes or no and what did it contain and who from?
No, I have not.In post 1708, MathBlade wrote:And lastly have you watched any you tube or musicals recently?
Can you help me out and show me where you claimed mailman?In post 1717, Anya wrote:hey everyone love you
It was said earlier you did.In post 1719, Anya wrote:what how did you know i was a mailman?
...I mean that works lolIn post 1722, Anya wrote:wait what how did they figure out i was a mafia rolecop?
