Mafiascum.net

Plus I know there's probably a vig who's just going to shoot me if I don't get booted today anyway.

I still don't understand why Titus came straight out with the strong vote if it wasn't based on anything but a cold read. And I don't know why Gamma voted Titus that quickly without results of his own. But I explained that dilemma. If someone comes out of the gate with a vote like that, I'm assuming they've got a result on someone.

In post 1647, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why did you check Roden? Also why were you referring to what looked like guiltiest when you are an investigation role yourself? Wouldn’t your natural inclination be to be MORE skeptical about any possible guilties via knowing you yourself are already investigative? This thought process does not track at all IMO

In post 1650, Titus wrote:

In post 1648, Galron wrote:Roden was flexing a PR. I assume there's a vig in the game. I wanted to know if that was Roden.

You think an odd night gunsmith would be the only investigative?

Why would you want to know who a vig was? If a vig shot happens, then investigate. A vig detection would just force him to claim. Shouldn't you be looking for scum?

In post 1654, Roden wrote:

In post 1641, Galron wrote:

In post 1638, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1625, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: galron
Fork it, I was floundering for reasons to TR him D1 and I know from LN 235 that tends to be a bad sign

That's E-2.

My vote makes it E-1.

Claim time, tick tock.

Tick tock.

Odd-night gunsmith. Checked Roden.

You checked someone who softed PR and who you said you town read? Instead of sb9, who you scum read? What was the thought process behind that?

In post 1659, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1648, Galron wrote:Roden was flexing a PR. I assume there's a vig in the game. I wanted to know if that was Roden.

You think an odd night gunsmith would be the only investigative?

So you weren't looking for scum with your odd-night PR?

In post 1667, T3 wrote:So, what was your result? I

strongly

think we should llim Galron if he doesn't provide a satisfactory answer.

In post 1678, HockeyFan wrote:ok nvm im fine revoting this, @roden, PREPARE for hammer

In post 1677, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1675, T3 wrote:Literally a scumclaim

hm ok anylayzing this more.

if galron flips scum >> there is also 50/50 between kop themselves. ATLEAST one mafia is bussing here on the wagon, if galron flips red. unless i forgot about anothe person? then it would just be galron + that person + kop. there is also a chance where there could be 4 mafia possibly. idk that would mean town PRs need to be strong.

Roden you claimed PR? And Galron decided not to out the result on you. I think it's either from a spectrum of a TSTBS playstyle or just basic scum play.

Does scum really do this? Does scum actually out a check saying they were looking for a vig when most of this lobby came out saying that shouldn't be the case? or is galron playing wifom with their check to make us think that? Or is it just basic scum mindset?

town!galron would be them in a world where they actually did want to try to find vigi for their own self cure. (which im still tryna understand because its selfish)
scum!galron is signaling to the scum team
scum!galron is just playing bad and fucked up the claim

This slot has more equity to flip scum more than town for more reasons attributed to being scum with scum!galron.

There is literally a confirmed mafia on the wagon if that is the case. So we should use the time to deciher pairings / interactions of whom that be.

ill probably iso some their interacitons later

In post 1692, Galron wrote:And I really am not going to take the time to explain why it's a good idea to check your town reads. I've always done it that way. It's what led to me shooting a townDGB in the face last year.

How did this affect your read on me then?

In post 1701, Galron wrote:I still don't understand why Titus came straight out with the strong vote if it wasn't based on anything but a cold read. And I don't know why Gamma voted Titus that quickly without results of his own. But I explained that dilemma. If someone comes out of the gate with a vote like that, I'm assuming they've got a result on someone.

Eh I don't like this. This feels like signaling to the mafia team to kill Gamma.

Every time.

pedit: no effect, roden

In post 1169, GrandpaMo wrote:Okay this is how I am looking at it.

salsa, galron, kop all look like have been targets for elims.

i believe one scum is in here.

this is where i personally stand.

Salsa town -- being miscondemned.
Galron null -- haven't followed up anything / coasting.
Kop scum -- no pressure / coasting

i will talk about thsi more when i come back but just think bout it ... like hopefulyl im not crazy.

This progression on the slot took a toll >> went from a twonread to a null read to a scumread.

I still believe my read is right. Scum could just be both Galron + Kop.

I want to hammer here.

In post 1702, GrandpaMo wrote: There is literally a confirmed mafia on the wagon if that is the case. So we should use the time to deciher pairings / interactions of whom that be.

ill probably iso some their interacitons later

In post 1707, GrandpaMo wrote:I want to hammer here.

Anyways I agree with that post for the most part. Im hunting more for town atm tbh, and I feel super confident in my town core, so mafia is just everyone else

Galron, if you think it's best to die, I'd love last reads.

In post 1700, Galron wrote:Plus I know there's probably a vig who's just going to shoot me if I don't get booted today anyway.

What makes you think there's a Vig?

burn the witch

In post 1691, Galron wrote:I see no reason to out my result or lack thereof. It would do more harm than good most likely.

Why? Why would you withhold this information if you're town?

Roden, I am worried we're decoing this but I feel like Galron has to go.

Ok good I'm not the only one getting Deco vibes. But yeah, I agree Galron has to go, I don't think we're getting any more info.

VOTE: Galron

In post 1697, Galron wrote:Because I do that, it really is more harmful than good and it just distracts from everyhting else.

It's either NO GUN and he's town, or GUN and he could be scum LOL

Can we swing the hammer pls?

Hallelujah!

In post 1700, Galron wrote:Plus I know there's probably a vig who's just going to shoot me if I don't get booted today anyway.

Potential TMI that there is a vig?

Titus why did you vote me btw?

Grandpa dancing around voting Galron be like

In post 1719, T3 wrote:Titus why did you vote me btw?

Random due to wagon position. I was truly resetting.

In post 1718, T3 wrote:

In post 1700, Galron wrote:Plus I know there's probably a vig who's just going to shoot me if I don't get booted today anyway.

Potential TMI that there is a vig?

Possibly. A gunsmith would suspect there is town with a gun.

i think titus's vote was hammer right?

Yup.