Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2022 5:42 am
vote count 1.17
with 14 votes in play, it takes 8 to make a decision. day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-06-14 01:30:00).
In post 1698, MathBlade wrote:Why are you all not questioning implosion on asking about something not present in the game? Implosion said someone asked about my timer and deadline which is untrue.
In post 1612, Datisi wrote:vote count 1.16
with 14 votes in play, it takes 8 to make a decision. day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-06-14 01:30:00).
That doesn’t answer the question.In post 1702, Harley Quinn wrote:In post 1698, MathBlade wrote:Why are you all not questioning implosion on asking about something not present in the game? Implosion said someone asked about my timer and deadline which is untrue.In post 1612, Datisi wrote:vote count 1.16
with 14 votes in play, it takes 8 to make a decision. day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-06-14 01:30:00).
I don't rlly like this on a personal levelIn post 1634, Bellaphant wrote:Maths wagon is made up of my null, null scum reads and ....you.
In post 1691, MathBlade wrote:Who said that? Where?In post 1690, implosion wrote:We have over 3 days left. Just want to point that out bc I think someone thought the timer math posted is deadline. It isn’t.
We can’t do much until he answers, however I wouldn’t necessarily describe that as an “attack”. In fact in a game I was in, a townie accused a scum of misrepping the deadline, which caused me to in part wrongly tr that player and we lost.In post 1701, MathBlade wrote:Like the attacks on me are that I am not in reality.
But when confronted with an example you don’t shit all over him?
Why the double standard?
I am not saying whether or not it’s an honest mistake or notIn post 1705, Harley Quinn wrote:In post 1691, MathBlade wrote:Who said that? Where?In post 1690, implosion wrote:We have over 3 days left. Just want to point that out bc I think someone thought the timer math posted is deadline. It isn’t.We can’t do much until he answers, however I wouldn’t necessarily describe that as an “attack”. In fact in a game I was in, a townie accused a scum of misrepping the deadline, which caused me to in part wrongly tr that player and we lost.In post 1701, MathBlade wrote:Like the attacks on me are that I am not in reality.
But when confronted with an example you don’t shit all over him?
Why the double standard?
Not at all remotely suggesting that’s what’s happening here but I honestly didn’t think anything of it. I certainly would never sr someone solely on something like that even if true, which in this case, I actually agree with you since I can’t find any such post but I don’t see why it couldn’t be an honest mistake, it was in that game. \_0_/
Hmm . . . that is an interesting point, I do hard tr Roden and Ari on HEM wagon, so I might need to rethink the wagon distribution. @Titus, other than Math, who do you think is scum on HEM wagon?In post 1634, Bellaphant wrote:In post 1615, Harley Quinn wrote:Lol, gee Math, I thought you and HEM were TYT and now you’re voting him?In post 1612, Datisi wrote:vote count 1.16
with 14 votes in play, it takes 8 to make a decision. day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-06-14 01:30:00).
I have laid out why Math is 99.9999% going to flip scum but it seems not everyone is reading mine, Gamma’s and Titus’ posts? If I had any doubts, I wouldn’t be saying that I’m 99.9999% sure Math is scum. He will flip scum here and if I was kingmaker, I would see to it that he was flipped today.In post 1612, Datisi wrote:vote count 1.16
with 14 votes in play, it takes 8 to make a decision. day 1 ends in (expired on 2022-06-14 01:30:00).
Also, look at these wagons, from my pov. Maths wagon is made up of my null, null scum reads and ....you. The hem wagon is made up of basically my town reads. Why is it incomprehensible to you that I'm not jumping on the math wagon, when my own experiences outside of this game, plus my own reads in this game, suggest it's a bad move?
White Flag was in February of 21 correct and Koba mini normal was just recently.In post 1654, MathBlade wrote:Those are like years ago unfortunately they aren’t recent.
I will look them up on my lunch break
misinterpret != misrepIn post 1694, MathBlade wrote:How would you misrep something I don’t think exists?In post 1692, implosion wrote:might have been misinterpretinig things but don't have time to check atm, will be on in an hour or two
One more important note: remember that Enchant is just gonna autohammer anyone at E-1. So pretend everyone is at one less vote to elim.
Why would you claiming vt have jack to do with anything?In post 1657, humaneatingmonkey wrote:i really dont know why scum would still want my wagon after saying im vt. there are more interesting things to do, like running up random wagons to get a claim. is that risky in this gamestate? i have no idea.
How do you misinterpret something that doesn’t exist?In post 1711, Gamma Emerald wrote:misinterpret != misrepIn post 1694, MathBlade wrote:How would you misrep something I don’t think exists?In post 1692, implosion wrote:might have been misinterpretinig things but don't have time to check atm, will be on in an hour or two
One more important note: remember that Enchant is just gonna autohammer anyone at E-1. So pretend everyone is at one less vote to elim.
If I don’t care for his explanation, I’ll do just that, okay?In post 1708, MathBlade wrote:I am not saying whether or not it’s an honest mistake or notIn post 1705, Harley Quinn wrote:In post 1691, MathBlade wrote:Who said that? Where?In post 1690, implosion wrote:We have over 3 days left. Just want to point that out bc I think someone thought the timer math posted is deadline. It isn’t.We can’t do much until he answers, however I wouldn’t necessarily describe that as an “attack”. In fact in a game I was in, a townie accused a scum of misrepping the deadline, which caused me to in part wrongly tr that player and we lost.In post 1701, MathBlade wrote:Like the attacks on me are that I am not in reality.
But when confronted with an example you don’t shit all over him?
Why the double standard?
Not at all remotely suggesting that’s what’s happening here but I honestly didn’t think anything of it. I certainly would never sr someone solely on something like that even if true, which in this case, I actually agree with you since I can’t find any such post but I don’t see why it couldn’t be an honest mistake, it was in that game. \_0_/
I am saying why are people not attacking implosion for “not being in reality”
If I disagree with what you’re saying “I am not in reality”
Implosion posts something verifiably false and not real
And doesn’t get attacked in the same manner why?
In post 1704, Gamma Emerald wrote:I don't rlly like this on a personal levelIn post 1634, Bellaphant wrote:Maths wagon is made up of my null, null scum reads and ....you.
@gamma, why not?In post 1707, Dwlee99 wrote:Bellaphant can be easily scum here. They had a borderline TMI townread on me and then nose dived into scumreading and discrediting me for no reason
Only explanation is that Bellaphant thought Math's timer was the deadline.In post 1633, Bellaphant wrote:Noone seems interested in my scum reads and I don't think will be until we've flipped some or the more controversial slots.We have like a day and a half leftand I just want to be done with today.
idk, I can't tell what the original thing you're even talking about from implo isIn post 1713, MathBlade wrote:How do you misinterpret something that doesn’t exist?In post 1711, Gamma Emerald wrote:misinterpret != misrepIn post 1694, MathBlade wrote:How would you misrep something I don’t think exists?In post 1692, implosion wrote:might have been misinterpretinig things but don't have time to check atm, will be on in an hour or two
One more important note: remember that Enchant is just gonna autohammer anyone at E-1. So pretend everyone is at one less vote to elim.
Literally no one talked about it?
In post 1691, MathBlade wrote:Who said that? Where?In post 1690, implosion wrote:We have over 3 days left. Just want to point that out bc I think someone thought the timer math posted is deadline. It isn’t.
why did you distinguish HQ in that way? It felt disdainfulIn post 1716, Bellaphant wrote:In post 1704, Gamma Emerald wrote:I don't rlly like this on a personal levelIn post 1634, Bellaphant wrote:Maths wagon is made up of my null, null scum reads and ....you.@gamma, why not?In post 1707, Dwlee99 wrote:Bellaphant can be easily scum here. They had a borderline TMI townread on me and then nose dived into scumreading and discrediting me for no reason
@dweelee, I liked your answer but you've barely done anything else. Like ...even you said you weren't here.
Also, these seem a weird cluster.
I didn’t comment on it both because I didn’t really think anything of it either way and unless I take issue with Implosion’s explanation, I probably won’t but if I don’t like it, I absolutely will.In post 1717, MathBlade wrote:You’re not seeing my point.
The default setting is to do that to me.
When proven with a concrete actual example of things not matching reality,
Not only do you ignore it until it’s brought up
You just wait and see a response
You’re civil.
There’s no insulting, no talking down, no accusations
Everyone just breezed along like it’s another day in the neighborhood.
I just want that same level of courtesy.