Mafiascum.net

would u want to vote malcolm pooky

im voting for you what r u even talking about

im asking

would there be any world where u would vote malcolm

I don't negotiate with criminals

realistically though I'm willing to vote for everyone except Titus, Mathblade and Frogster

I'd be willing to vote for Frogster if we're getting rid of him for being disruptive to the game and being anti-town pushing awful reads but I don't think he's mafia here

Frogster's playstyle is annoying because he's purposefully very polarized and I suspect he does it for a reason so that he can be immune to being voted out as town which is basically right on the borderline of openly trust telling without saying so

but he also has incredible self belief in his reads which are usually just wrong and he never learns from it so I'm not sure if its because he's incapable of learning or because he's trolling games just to piss people off on purpose.

Yeah not impressed with pooky's solving here. Talk to me --not about me-- if you want to sort me.

i said you're town am i wrong?

in the three scum games of yours i've read you basically don't participate or talk at all.

you basically ghost the thread

in your town games you just keep humming along throwing things into the thread to "solve"

it's pretty polarized is this not a good way to read you?

In post 1708, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:it's pretty polarized is this not a good way to read you?

In post 1707, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:i said you're town am i wrong?

A Question a Day Keeps the Tracker Away

ur such a troll dont talk to me if you're going to waste my time with horseshit

In post 1708, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:in the three scum games of yours i've read you basically don't participate or talk at all.

you basically ghost the thread

in your town games you just keep humming along throwing things into the thread to "solve"

it's pretty polarized is this not a good way to read you?

In post 1705, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Frogster's playstyle is annoying because he's purposefully very polarized and I suspect he does it for a reason so that he can be immune to being voted out as town which is basically right on the borderline of openly trust telling without saying so

but he also has incredible self belief in his reads which are usually just wrong and he never learns from it so I'm not sure if its because he's incapable of learning or because he's trolling games just to piss people off on purpose.

In post 1710, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:ur such a troll dont talk to me if you're going to waste my time with horseshit

I'm not really sure where the anger is coming from and I'm assuming it's fake and scum-motivated. If it isn't then you can try to explain what's making you angry I guess.

you still think pookys scum froggy..? why?

Pooky gambit. He hasn't proven anything. Fill in the blanks any way you want.

I kinda wanna see Titus’s response to this.

I has a plan

In post 1711, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1708, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:in the three scum games of yours i've read you basically don't participate or talk at all.

you basically ghost the thread

in your town games you just keep humming along throwing things into the thread to "solve"

it's pretty polarized is this not a good way to read you?

In post 1705, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Frogster's playstyle is annoying because he's purposefully very polarized and I suspect he does it for a reason so that he can be immune to being voted out as town which is basically right on the borderline of openly trust telling without saying so

but he also has incredible self belief in his reads which are usually just wrong and he never learns from it so I'm not sure if its because he's incapable of learning or because he's trolling games just to piss people off on purpose.

In post 1710, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:ur such a troll dont talk to me if you're going to waste my time with horseshit

I'm not really sure where the anger is coming from and I'm assuming it's fake and scum-motivated. If it isn't then you can try to explain what's making you angry I guess.

probly cuz its the 2nd game in a row you shit tunneled me for lol????reasoning and were wrong i held my tongue in the anon game but i think you're just doing this to piss me off atp

In post 1592, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1591, MalcolmTucker wrote:What's the Pooky cased based on? I find Pooky hard to read in general and had them null so far.

They're playing to their scum meta and their D1 votes were poor in hindsight

In post 1595, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1593, MalcolmTucker wrote:

In post 1592, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1591, MalcolmTucker wrote:What's the Pooky cased based on? I find Pooky hard to read in general and had them null so far.

They're playing to their scum meta and their D1 votes were poor in hindsight

What specifically is Pooky's scum meta? I find them hard to parse in most games but can't recall having actually played with scum Pooky now I think of it.

Lurk early game, power through late game

@marci

Nothing has changed since here. If anything their reaction to being voted is +scum. Looks kind of artificial.

also im not actually angry I just dont think you're playing the game in good faith you're just trolling me to try to piss me off because you think its fun to piss me off

similar to what you did to catboi when he claimed innocent child and you blew him up in ktane anyway.

i dont believe you are playing to solve you are playing just to fuck with people

In post 1716, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1592, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1591, MalcolmTucker wrote:What's the Pooky cased based on? I find Pooky hard to read in general and had them null so far.

They're playing to their scum meta and their D1 votes were poor in hindsight

In post 1595, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1593, MalcolmTucker wrote:

In post 1592, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1591, MalcolmTucker wrote:What's the Pooky cased based on? I find Pooky hard to read in general and had them null so far.

They're playing to their scum meta and their D1 votes were poor in hindsight

What specifically is Pooky's scum meta? I find them hard to parse in most games but can't recall having actually played with scum Pooky now I think of it.

Lurk early game, power through late game

@marci

Nothing has changed since here. If anything their reaction to being voted is +scum. Looks kind of artificial.

yes because lurking to look scummy and stay in POE totally makes no sense to do when you're an investigative TPR

very good reasoning frog

does pooky usually fake claim a pr as scum thats so easy to disprove?

In post 1715, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:probly cuz its the 2nd game in a row you shit tunneled me for lol????reasoning and were wrong i held my tongue in the anon game but i think you're just doing this to piss me off atp

Okay, why are you focused on my vote in particular though? IIRC I don't think I was even the first one to FoS you.

PEdit

This just looks like desperate effort to make me second guess myself. My vote stays.

Can you all give Titus a moment to respond here before continuing your WW3?

I have an idea that might just stop Titus v Me
And Frogger v You

Assuming we are all town and depending upon Titus’s answer

In post 1699, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:i'll even breadcrumb last night's result I _____'d Titus and I know _____

she can tell me if she wants me to reveal the result ok?

@Titus so it’s not lost

VOTE: frogster

this slot is town but if we dont elim him we will lose this game

like you're basically scum siding clown show