Page 70 of 179
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 4:25 am
by Trevor
Your case on Lowman is bad, Tech. What happened to everyone who has lurked even more than Low, or everyone who has tried to policy lynch even more? Your lurking case falls short on the fact that he has been VLA for the past 4 days or so as well. What do you think about zoraster, dramonic, zajnet, robotnick, MoS, and funkybike?
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 4:28 am
by UberNinja
↑ Rhinox wrote: ↑ TeChNoWC wrote: ↑ petapan wrote:VOTE: lowman
Let's lynch the lurkers. let's lynch all the lurkers.
Not sure lynching lurkers will get us anywhere. You feel it is hard to find scum in this setup, yet you think lynching lurkers will help us hit scum?
Still, lowman is a PL loving, wagon jumping, happy to kill town lurker scummy.
I don't mind thinning him and seeing what we get; good chance he is one of the scummy lurkers.
Unvote
Vote: Lowman
This is a bad post.
No it's not.
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 4:29 am
by manho
↑ TeChNoWC wrote:manho, an easy start would be to ISO the top wagons (Lowman, Luffy and BB (on second thoughts, BB might take awhile
)) and see if any of them appear scummy.
that's what i usually do. but i'm tired now. will read them tomorrow.
and i still haven't read muffin/kondi.
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 4:30 am
by UberNinja
Well, it IS a bad post, but not necessarily indicative of scum intent.
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 4:30 am
by UberNinja
There's no case on Lowman. Lowman isn't getting lynched.
Move along... *stormtrooper hand wave*... move along...
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 4:36 am
by TeChNoWC
↑ Trevor wrote:Your case on Lowman is bad, Tech. What happened to everyone who has lurked even more than Low, or everyone who has tried to policy lynch even more? Your lurking case falls short on the fact that he has been VLA for the past 4 days or so as well. What do you think about zoraster, dramonic, zajnet, robotnick, MoS, and funkybike?
I would prefer to wait until he returns from VL/A before lynching him, but he was lurking way before then, so I don't expect we will get that much out of him.
Anyway, we are getting caught up on the lurker issue. It's not his main scumtell at all, it just makes him stand out for ISOers, and its a tiny portion of his case.
Is there anything telling about any of the other lurkers? from memory, dramonic, for example, has been lurking AND THAT'S IT. Lowman actually has a few more scumtells than that.
If you think any of the other lurkers are vote worthy, or even more so than Lowman, then sure I'll be happy to ISO them and give you my thoughts.
What do you think of Lowman? You think he is town, or just that there is not a strong enough case to say either way?
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 4:52 am
by mykonian
votecount
luffy (6): staeg, rhinox, BBmolla, Nobody special, mattP, zdenek
lowman (6): amrun, elmo teh azn, luffy, PeregrineV, petapan, TechnoWC
BBmolla (4): theamateur, zajnet, syndromeofadown, Kondi2424
YYR (2): RedFF, trevor
PeregrineV (2): Hoopla, zoraster
Trevor (1): uberninja
RedFF (1): Lowman
Spyrex (1): callforjudgement
zdenek (1): Hoopla
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 5:48 am
by TheTrollie
I have been busy with graduation stuff for the past few days. Can someone summarize the case on Luffy & Lowman for me? I still might be ok with riding the BB wagon but I have to ISO him again before deciding that.
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 6:23 am
by SpyreX
Trevor & Red & Peta:
Help me here. Watching a wagon fall based on... nothing this game is moonbeams. Dont let it happen
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 6:45 am
by BBmolla
Go ahead and lynch me. I can't get any of my scumreads lynched anyways.
Why the fuck wouldn't you put dayvigs in this game, jesus christ.
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 6:46 am
by SpyreX
Dont you give up on me. We're TRYING to make that happen.
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 6:57 am
by Nobody Special
I hate that UN says Lowman's not getting lynched. Allow me to help prove you WRONG:
unvote
Vote: Lowman
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 6:58 am
by SpyreX
NS NO.
DONT BE THAT GUY
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 6:59 am
by Ellibereth
so I have no time for this yet...
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 6:59 am
by SpyreX
Then help me and vote Luffy, damnit.
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 7:08 am
by Nobody Special
↑ SpyreX wrote:NS NO.
DONT BE THAT GUY
What do YOU think of Lowman?
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 7:09 am
by Elmo TeH AzN
VOTE: Luffy
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 7:10 am
by BBmolla
Scumtells don't apply to NS, everything he does is scummy.
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 7:11 am
by Nobody Special
That was rather random.
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 7:21 am
by SpyreX
I'm doing something here. Something important.
Help me
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 7:27 am
by Rhinox
↑ TeChNoWC wrote:Not sure lynching lurkers will get us anywhere.
↑ TeChNoWC wrote:I don't mind thinning him and seeing what we get; good chance he is one of the scummy lurkers.
Unvote
Vote: Lowman
This looks like a big contradiction. Like, you just said you didn't think it would get us anywhere but you did it anyways.
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 7:29 am
by Rhinox
↑ Nobody Special wrote:I hate that UN says Lowman's not getting lynched. Allow me to help prove you WRONG:
unvote
Vote: Lowman
And luffy said he wasn't getting lynched and dared us to try. Why Lowman and not Luffy?
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 7:34 am
by BBmolla
Not really, I stated voting Lowman was a scumtell. It doesn't make you scum is all I'm saying.
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 7:42 am
by LowMan
So I come back to find a wagon on me, based mainly on lurking even though I stated clearly I was v/la the past 4 days.
Ah well, if I'm going to be a PL for lurking then so be it. I'll even help it along.
VOTE: LowMan
Posted: Fri May 25, 2012 7:48 am
by Trevor
Disappointed.