I could poison you tonight, and lynch matt tomorrow!
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 8:57 pm
by Ms Marangal
would that make you happier Nacho?
BTW, I just noticed your sig, it's pertty
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 10:32 pm
by inte
alright then after matt and me are dead whos next
Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 10:35 pm
by Shadoweh
Buncha teases. Why would you run someone up to L-1 when you all think I'm going to flip scum already? You could put it back, I've never gotten to do one of those quickhammer troll posts like the normal people get. God, none of you ever let me have any fun! You won't even try to compose gauche poetry for me! WHEN I'M SCUM YOU'RE THE FIRST ONE I'LL KILL TAMMY. >8(
Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 4:11 am
by Bert
inte's apathy about being lynched seems town tbh, especially in comparison to stuff like:
In post 1699, projectmatt wrote:There hasn't been a single bit of logic that could feasibly support a vote on me and I think it's hysterical.
Vote: projectmatt
Nacho, come back to this lovely wagon? Let's be stubborn and ask others to join in...
if you join, there's 4, and we just need 2 more
Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 4:12 am
by Bert
Reminds me of goodmorning-scum in 514 masons and monks...
"you've got no case, you've got no case, this is all BS *rant continues*"
Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 4:23 am
by FakeGod
Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 4:52 am
by qwints
That was a really bad post, Bert. I'll join the wagon.
In post 1734, Bert wrote:Reminds me of goodmorning-scum in 514 masons and monks...
"you've got no case, you've got no case, this is all BS *rant continues*"
In post 1736, qwints wrote:That was a really bad post, Bert. I'll join the wagon.
UNVOTE: VOTE: projectmatt
Actually, the entire fucking problem here is that there
is no case.
Sure, you guys have suspected me, which is reasonable. However, when I play a game of mafia I kind of expect maybe someone - anyone, to provide me with logic - especially in the kind of situation where it seems like I'm marked for an inevitable death.
The only logic that has been provided ironically has been by Nacho who's case was either a lie or a complete and total stretch of the truth. Still, what's equally as frustrating is that
none of you guys seem to realize it.
Either there's honestly some kind of secret organization in this game that is actually going through my posts in order to analyze them thoroughly and I'm missing something, or you guys just aren't following logic in any fathomable way. And no, before you say that you prefer Inte's 'apathy" (IE: coasting, prod dodging) to me actually wanting to play the game I signed up for maybe you should actually consider the implications of that.
Have a field day poisoning me if you want but I fully expect most of you guys who are town to seriously reevaluate the whole "apparently not reading the game" or "lynching solely on a false intuition" part of your playstyle.
Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 7:45 am
by Empire
Posting a prod dodge from my phone right now, I'll have a more complete post later tonight.
Tammy, I still lean towards lynching inte today. This is going to be another situation like last time where the last time where the vote I put down is not going to move.
Also, projectmatt reacts like this as town. I can't link it but read his ISO in that Cheery Dog Mini Normal, can't remember the number right now, should be under recently completed games.
Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 7:58 am
by Nachomamma8
i'm pretty ok lynching inte if matt is gonna yell at me
Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:01 am
by Bert
Nacho, why inte over matt
Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:02 am
by Nachomamma8
In post 1738, Empire wrote:This is going to be another situation like last time where the last time where the vote I put down is not going to move.
if you ever put it down
seriously put the vote down on inte
shadoweh had the opportunity to quickhammer and didn't
this means either:
A) Shadoweh is town and thus inte is definitely scum
B) Shadoweh is scum and didn't want to quickhammer her buddy
C) Shadoweh is scum but both inte/matt are scum so she wanted the matt mislynch if she could grab it
Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:02 am
by Nachomamma8
bert it's time to start clearing out suspects
Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:04 am
by Empire
I'll put a vote down after I talk things over with Tammy (if she's around later today anyway).
Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:04 am
by Nachomamma8
In post 1634, Empire wrote:he just made it up himself. If it's the latter, one of us in the Neighborhood would have told him that such a claim was impossible (because all Wingates are supposed to have access to the QT and he didn't).
but how the hell would he know the monthname Wingate thing unless he had a buddy who was a wingate with a monthname?
(sorry i thought i responded to this earlier but apparently i was doing too much LSD as of late, fried my brain a little)
Yeah, but that's contingent on that neighborhood being "clear" as they say
do you really think inte is likely to flip scum
just for the sake of "clearing out [lurker] suspects" isn't enough at this point, otherwise Shoe would have died long ago
Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:08 am
by Empire
Also, was Shadoweh around in the 2 hour period where Bert had his L-1 vote down? Otherwise, you can't really say Shadoweh had the opportunity to hammer.
And as far as the nameclaim is concerned, I have no idea. I'll talk more later since I'm about to go watch a movie.
P-edit: I'm playing this Goodbar-style (only projectmatt will get this reference).
Sorry, the general crippling paranoia I inherited from Tammy has me it really hard to put down a vote in this game.
Posted: Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:09 am
by Bert
In post 1732, Shadoweh wrote:Buncha teases. Why would you run someone up to L-1 when you all think I'm going to flip scum already? You could put it back, I've never gotten to do one of those quickhammer troll posts like the normal people get. God, none of you ever let me have any fun! You won't even try to compose gauche poetry for me! WHEN I'M SCUM YOU'RE THE FIRST ONE I'LL KILL TAMMY. >8(
At the time of this post, I had not yet unvoted, so YES