Mafiascum.net

In post 1714, Slandaar wrote:They are lower if we don't claim. The end.

And all God's people said..

In post 1724, Infinity 324 wrote:Ok, can you give reasons?

If I felt like it maybe. But I don't think its necessary.

I feel like talking.

So...how's your day going?

In post 1727, Infinity 324 wrote:I feel like talking.

So...how's your day going?

Decentish.
Lost another game of mafia.
Decided its about time to quit when my ongoings are all finished.

VOTECOUNT 2.07

+2 — LicketyQuickety, Slandaar
+1 — Manuel87
+2 — Infinity 324, Raskolnikov
+1 — hiplop
+1 — DrippingGoofball
0 —
0 —
0 —
0 —
+1 — Firebringer
0 —

+3 — MariaR, JarJarDrinks, Vedith

With 11 alive, it takes 6 votes to lynch.

Deadline is in .

Awaiting prod responses from: N/A
Searching for replacements for: N/A
V/LA: , until 23rd

In post 1608, LicketyQuickety wrote:

In post 1603, JarJarDrinks wrote:

In post 1541, Infinity 324 wrote:I think lickety is town because of the interactions with rb, rb was trying to policy lynch him and lickety didn't try to appease rb at all.

I think you're giving too much credit for this. I think u can give him a few town points but there's a lot of scumminess from LQ.

I kinda agree with this. I would not say my case on rb lock clears me, but it is something you don't really see in my scum game too often. Not going to give to the spiel that I have a Scummy meta, I'll let you figure that out on your own.

scummy post.

First off I hate when people don't accept towncred. Feels fake.

Also you say you don't agree w/ it but then then you post reasons for people to agree w/ it.

Someone finally scumreads LQ with me?

In post 1709, Slandaar wrote:Claiming today is idiocy

Agree w/ this. But too many people already went along w/ it so kinda have to go w/ it now.

In post 1686, Slandaar wrote:

In post 1550, Raskolnikov wrote:Looking at his meta though I see similar as both unfortunately

You will need to explain this.

You need to use singlescum games as an example. SK/Multiball games are very different meta I don't feel like explaining why but it should be obvious.

What I was saying is that posts I thought had towntells in your game turned out useless because I saw similar from you both alignments... in total reading into it was kind of inconclusive and it feels careless assuming I can read you after seeing those scumgames. I want firebringers read on you because I doubt your s/s and he's probably town individually.

Also claim. Your argument is you won't claim now because the claim was a bad idea in the first place but that doesn't really follow... with all that's out already there's no downside to finishing.
Don't like this stubbornness though; I feel you should know better?

In post 1732, MariaR wrote:Someone finally scumreads LQ with me?

Any reason you're not voting your scum read?

Unless I'm missing something, here's what I have for claims:

DrippingGoofball - PR (Watcher)
Firebringer- VT
hiplop - ??????
Infinity 324 - PR
JarJarDrinks - PR
LicketyQuickety - VT
Manuel87 - PR
MariaR - PR
Raskolnikov - VT
Slandaar - ??????
Vedith - PR

How are you doing Rask?

In post 1735, Vedith wrote:

In post 1732, MariaR wrote:Someone finally scumreads LQ with me?

Any reason you're not voting your scum read?

I'm scared.

That's kind of ridiculous tbh. A one day role madness.

So after checking, DGB looks scum, Lickety looks town.

VOTE: DGB

We're not lynching till the last 2 players claim.

In post 1741, JarJarDrinks wrote:We're not lynching till the last 2 players claim.

I don't mind waiting, but DGB is the right lynch today.
Lickety I'm pretty sure is town.

In post 1742, Vedith wrote:I don't mind waiting, but DGB is the right lynch today.

You don't think that the fact that we have so many PRs and he hasn't been countered doesn't point to him being town?

In post 1743, JarJarDrinks wrote:You don't think that the fact that we have so many PRs and he hasn't been countered doesn't point to him being town?

No, I do not think that at all.
(DGB) is most likely scum.

In post 1737, MariaR wrote:How are you doing Rask?

Writing that sucked out my energy and I don't even have the confidence I had then so it was like a massive waste of time. The associations findings are still good at least.
I mean hip/dgb are still probably scum but dgb/slandaar would mean slandaar used meta against his scumpartner which feels kind of unlikely. But if slan is town then one of my townreads is wrong but I just went through them all...

@Vedith why DGB over hiplop?

I'll just say it otherwise we get no where. I'm a Watcher.
No way is there 2 in the game for town.

that's good enough 4 me.

Need the last 2 claims, then we can lynch.

Ummm

In post 1514, Vedith wrote:

In post 1513, Infinity 324 wrote:-All PRs are night 2
-kts was a PR that trolled and got lynched d1--some valuable interactions here
-DGB is scamming it up and doing nothing,

she claimed n2 watcher

Not much else...

KTS always trolls, it's an NAI... Shame on you lot I guess.

DGB doing nothing isn't a scum tell right now

.