Mini Normal 1841 - At The End... (GAME OVER)

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #1725 (ISO) » Thu Oct 27, 2016 6:51 am

WE LYNCH INFINITY TODAY

inspectorscout · Post Post #1726 (ISO) » Thu Oct 27, 2016 6:54 am

Vote Count 3.5

JarJarDrinks- [1] Infinity 324
Dunnstral - [0]

[L-2]

Infinity 324 - [4] Gamma Emerald, JarJarDrinks, Mathblade, Dongempire
XnadrojX -[1] Dunnstral
iraonavp-[0]
Mathblade - [0]
Manuel87 - [0]
Gamma Emerald - [0]
Dongempire - [0]
Something_Smart - [0]

Not Voting - Something_Smart, Manuel87, XnadrojX,.iraonavp

Mod Notes – Quality Shitmodding

With 10 Alive, It Takes 6 to Lynch.

Day 3 Ends In (expired on 2016-11-08 04:06:50).

[/area]

Dunnstral · Post Post #1727 (ISO) » Thu Oct 27, 2016 6:56 am

In post 1725, Gamma Emerald wrote:WE LYNCH INFINITY TODAY

You're pushing a false dichotomy insteaad of taking the optimal action for town.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #1728 (ISO) » Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:04 am

IT'S NOT A FALSE DICHOTOMY, IT'S THE BEST CHOICE

Dunnstral · Post Post #1729 (ISO) » Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:11 am

No it's not. What if infinity is town?

Nadr is likely scum whether infinity is or not.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #1730 (ISO) » Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:11 am

In post 1729, Dunnstral wrote:No it's not. What if infinity is town?

Nadr is likely scum whether infinity is or not.

And yet you are avoiding lynching Infinity. We should lynch you.

Dunnstral · Post Post #1731 (ISO) » Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:13 am

Right. Because he's not the best choice for a lynch.

Manuel87 · Post Post #1732 (ISO) » Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:14 am

In post 1727, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 1725, Gamma Emerald wrote:WE LYNCH INFINITY TODAY
You're pushing a false dichotomy insteaad of taking the optimal action for town.

If you want to play it safe then the optimal action is no lynch.

Gamma tell me what do we lose with nolynch?

Dunnstral · Post Post #1733 (ISO) » Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:15 am

We're not no lynching

Dunnstral · Post Post #1734 (ISO) » Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:16 am

I explained that nadr is scummy refardless of infinity

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #1735 (ISO) » Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:16 am

In post 1732, Manuel87 wrote:
In post 1727, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 1725, Gamma Emerald wrote:WE LYNCH INFINITY TODAY
You're pushing a false dichotomy insteaad of taking the optimal action for town.
If you want to play it safe then the optimal action is no lynch.

Gamma tell me what do we lose with nolynch?

We lose me. And I'd like to lynch a mafia while I can.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #1736 (ISO) » Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:16 am

In post 1734, Dunnstral wrote:I explained that nadr is scummy refardless of infinity

And yet Infinity is confirmed scum.

Manuel87 · Post Post #1737 (ISO) » Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:16 am

We lose you tonight anyway

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #1738 (ISO) » Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:17 am

In post 1737, Manuel87 wrote:We lose you tonight anyway

I'd like to lynch a mafia before then.

Manuel87 · Post Post #1739 (ISO) » Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:17 am

ok because it was never asked and you are active right now 60 sekonds for an answer or you are scum Gamma

Who did you watch night 1?

Dunnstral · Post Post #1740 (ISO) » Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:18 am

In post 1736, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 1734, Dunnstral wrote:I explained that nadr is scummy refardless of infinity
And yet Infinity is confirmed scum.

Are you willing to be lynched if he's town?

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #1741 (ISO) » Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:18 am

In post 1739, Manuel87 wrote:ok because it was never asked and you are active right now 60 sekonds for an answer or you are scum Gamma

Who did you watch night 1?

Zach; no one visited him.

Manuel87 · Post Post #1742 (ISO) » Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:19 am

why zach?

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #1743 (ISO) » Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:20 am

In post 1742, Manuel87 wrote:why zach?

I figured he was widely townread from my questioning.

Manuel87 · Post Post #1744 (ISO) » Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:21 am

Zach wasnt widely townread if anything he was more scumread.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #1745 (ISO) » Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:22 am

In post 1744, Manuel87 wrote:Zach wasnt widely townread if anything he was more scumread.

Well when I asked the second time people said him.

Manuel87 · Post Post #1746 (ISO) » Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:23 am

In post 1745, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 1744, Manuel87 wrote:Zach wasnt widely townread if anything he was more scumread.
Well when I asked the second time people said him.

What?

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #1747 (ISO) » Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:24 am

In post 1746, Manuel87 wrote:
In post 1745, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 1744, Manuel87 wrote:Zach wasnt widely townread if anything he was more scumread.
Well when I asked the second time people said him.
What?

Day 1, I asked people who they townread because I wanted a good choice for my watcher ability.

JarJarDrinks · Post Post #1748 (ISO) » Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:26 am

poor gamma.

dude makes the correct call in who to watch, catches scum performing the kill, town refuses to lynch

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #1749 (ISO) » Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:27 am

In post 1748, JarJarDrinks wrote:poor gamma.

dude makes the correct call in who to watch, catches scum performing the kill, town refuses to lynch

And yet at least one of the people resisting {Manuel, Dunnstral} is scum.