Page 70 of 91

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 6:51 am
by Gamma Emerald
WE LYNCH INFINITY TODAY

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 6:54 am
by inspectorscout
Vote Count 3.5


JarJarDrinks- [1] Infinity 324
Dunnstral - [0]
[L-2]
Infinity 324 - [4] Gamma Emerald, JarJarDrinks, Mathblade, Dongempire
XnadrojX -[1] Dunnstral
iraonavp-[0]
Mathblade - [0]
Manuel87 - [0]
Gamma Emerald - [0]
Dongempire - [0]
Something_Smart - [0]


Not Voting - Something_Smart, Manuel87, XnadrojX,.iraonavp

Mod Notes – Quality Shitmodding

With 10 Alive, It Takes 6 to Lynch.

Day 3 Ends In (expired on 2016-11-08 04:06:50).
[/area]

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 6:56 am
by Dunnstral
In post 1725, Gamma Emerald wrote:WE LYNCH INFINITY TODAY
You're pushing a false dichotomy insteaad of taking the optimal action for town.

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:04 am
by Gamma Emerald
IT'S NOT A FALSE DICHOTOMY, IT'S THE BEST CHOICE

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:11 am
by Dunnstral
No it's not. What if infinity is town?

Nadr is likely scum whether infinity is or not.

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:11 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 1729, Dunnstral wrote:No it's not. What if infinity is town?

Nadr is likely scum whether infinity is or not.
And yet you are avoiding lynching Infinity. We should lynch you.

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:13 am
by Dunnstral
Right. Because he's not the best choice for a lynch.

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:14 am
by Manuel87
In post 1727, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 1725, Gamma Emerald wrote:WE LYNCH INFINITY TODAY
You're pushing a false dichotomy insteaad of taking the optimal action for town.
If you want to play it safe then the optimal action is no lynch.

Gamma tell me what do we lose with nolynch?

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:15 am
by Dunnstral
We're not no lynching

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:16 am
by Dunnstral
I explained that nadr is scummy refardless of infinity

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:16 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 1732, Manuel87 wrote:
In post 1727, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 1725, Gamma Emerald wrote:WE LYNCH INFINITY TODAY
You're pushing a false dichotomy insteaad of taking the optimal action for town.
If you want to play it safe then the optimal action is no lynch.

Gamma tell me what do we lose with nolynch?
We lose me. And I'd like to lynch a mafia while I can.

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:16 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 1734, Dunnstral wrote:I explained that nadr is scummy refardless of infinity
And yet Infinity is confirmed scum.

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:16 am
by Manuel87
We lose you tonight anyway

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:17 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 1737, Manuel87 wrote:We lose you tonight anyway
I'd like to lynch a mafia before then.

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:17 am
by Manuel87
ok because it was never asked and you are active right now 60 sekonds for an answer or you are scum Gamma

Who did you watch night 1?

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:18 am
by Dunnstral
In post 1736, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 1734, Dunnstral wrote:I explained that nadr is scummy refardless of infinity
And yet Infinity is confirmed scum.
Are you willing to be lynched if he's town?

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:18 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 1739, Manuel87 wrote:ok because it was never asked and you are active right now 60 sekonds for an answer or you are scum Gamma

Who did you watch night 1?
Zach; no one visited him.

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:19 am
by Manuel87
why zach?

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:20 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 1742, Manuel87 wrote:why zach?
I figured he was widely townread from my questioning.

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:21 am
by Manuel87
Zach wasnt widely townread if anything he was more scumread.

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:22 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 1744, Manuel87 wrote:Zach wasnt widely townread if anything he was more scumread.
Well when I asked the second time people said him.

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:23 am
by Manuel87
In post 1745, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 1744, Manuel87 wrote:Zach wasnt widely townread if anything he was more scumread.
Well when I asked the second time people said him.
What?

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:24 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 1746, Manuel87 wrote:
In post 1745, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 1744, Manuel87 wrote:Zach wasnt widely townread if anything he was more scumread.
Well when I asked the second time people said him.
What?
Day 1, I asked people who they townread because I wanted a good choice for my watcher ability.

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:26 am
by JarJarDrinks
poor gamma.

dude makes the correct call in who to watch, catches scum performing the kill, town refuses to lynch

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2016 7:27 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 1748, JarJarDrinks wrote:poor gamma.

dude makes the correct call in who to watch, catches scum performing the kill, town refuses to lynch
And yet at least one of the people resisting {Manuel, Dunnstral} is scum.