Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 12:59 pm
Not everyone plays by scumhunting some play by townhunting
In post 1721, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Dunn has NO reads
Page 70 of 236
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:00 pm
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:01 pm
In post 1326, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Okay, so... what are you doing?In post 1249, Dunnstral wrote:Just because you can't see it, doesn't mean I'm not doing anythingIn post 1144, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:- Dunn seriously has the most posts but prob one of the lowest content in his posts. Being useless in the open to look like he's putting in ~effort~ and being ~helpful~
What are you reads? Any tier list or anything?
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:02 pm
You can't tell me this equates to no readsIn post 1038, MiniDeathStar wrote:
Scum Meter
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:02 pm
In post 1332, Dunnstral wrote:I need a tier list to be figuring things out?In post 1326, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Okay, so... what are you doing?
What are you reads? Any tier list or anything?
Though in fact I do have one. it's in my pt. Just because you don't see something doesn't mean I'm not trying to figure things out. I'm pushing on who I think is scum
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:03 pm
Because I'm getting annoyed every time I push someone I get their partner yelling and defending them (before they even answer for themselves or anything) for ~secrets~.In post 1724, Gamma Emerald wrote:My reads are determined around what I currently think
I think Shadow is scum and Maria is town, structuring some of my other reads
Don't like how you're talking down all of us
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:04 pm
In post 1728, Gamma Emerald wrote:You can't tell me this equates to no reads
In post 1721, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:MDS has no scumreads
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:05 pm
Oh okay.In post 1729, Dunnstral wrote:In post 1332, Dunnstral wrote:I need a tier list to be figuring things out?In post 1326, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Okay, so... what are you doing?
What are you reads? Any tier list or anything?
Though in fact I do have one. it's in my pt. Just because you don't see something doesn't mean I'm not trying to figure things out. I'm pushing on who I think is scum
Let's start playing the game from our PT.
I will start voting there hopefully Fakegod moves my vote over.
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:11 pm
I've got ~reasons~ 
to keep some of my reads close. I'd prefer to just go for 2 obvious lynches, let the scum kill happen, and then come out with info. I'm also attempting to sort out Kagami
to keep some of my reads close. I'd prefer to just go for 2 obvious lynches, let the scum kill happen, and then come out with info. I'm also attempting to sort out KagamiPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:12 pm
When you say I have no reads it's so far from the truth though just chill
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:14 pm
@mhsmith thoughts on pie?
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:34 pm
As of writing this you have 278 posts, more than 100 more than the next person.In post 1734, Dunnstral wrote:When you say I have no reads it's so far from the truth though just chill
If I bring a random person right now and show them the "activity list" table they would think you're like controlling and leading the town and super hardcore scumhunting and asking questions of everyone and everything and keeping tabs everywhere.
Meanwhile seriously I ISO you and I see
extremely
little.Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:37 pm
Oh right I also wanted to see what people thought of these gamma posts I saw yesterday during ISO. They're just extremely weird and I don't know what to make of them:
In post 1188, Gamma Emerald wrote:Scum may know everyone's alignment, but they need to know what the popular opinion is and what not, so they still need to read. What you can do is see who says "I don't wanna read" and yet demonstrates an understanding of in-game events. This likely means they are getting told what is going on in daychat.
I know not all games have daychat, but specifically for this setup, I feel that point is relevant.
I have no idea what he's trying to say here. It feels like he's trying to throw shade in an extremely off-handed and non committed way but like... they feel so detached.In post 1272, Gamma Emerald wrote:One of my preferred scumhunting methods is watching people interact with confirmed town. Scum will try to discredit them any way they can.
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:43 pm
In post 1736, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:As of writing this you have 278 posts, more than 100 more than the next person.In post 1734, Dunnstral wrote:When you say I have no reads it's so far from the truth though just chill
If I bring a random person right now and show them the "activity list" table they would think you're like controlling and leading the town and super hardcore scumhunting and asking questions of everyone and everything and keeping tabs everywhere.
Meanwhile seriously I ISO you and I seeextremelylittle.
Well they wouldn't be wrong. I am doing that stuff. I've been asking questions and if it looks like they go nowhere it's because I discuss it in my pt
I assure you I'll have a fun amount of stuff to show when needed
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:46 pm
1721 - "I refuse to read the game at all"
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:48 pm
Hypocritical, no?In post 1721, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Me and inspector have discussed more reads than I feel has been discussed in 70 pages of this thread.
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:50 pm
I understand you don't have a reason to think I wrote a lot
But why not ask people questions if you're curious?
I want to know how mhsmith pie is doing myself
But why not ask people questions if you're curious?
I want to know how mhsmith pie is doing myself
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:51 pm
First post was me correcting a generalistic philosophyIn post 1737, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Oh right I also wanted to see what people thought of these gamma posts I saw yesterday during ISO. They're just extremely weird and I don't know what to make of them:
In post 1188, Gamma Emerald wrote:Scum may know everyone's alignment, but they need to know what the popular opinion is and what not, so they still need to read. What you can do is see who says "I don't wanna read" and yet demonstrates an understanding of in-game events. This likely means they are getting told what is going on in daychat.
I know not all games have daychat, but specifically for this setup, I feel that point is relevant.I have no idea what he's trying to say here. It feels like he's trying to throw shade in an extremely off-handed and non committed way but like... they feel so detached.In post 1272, Gamma Emerald wrote:One of my preferred scumhunting methods is watching people interact with confirmed town. Scum will try to discredit them any way they can.
Second post was me suggesting a scumhunting tool I figured out from my own scumplay
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:56 pm
Yeah but you said "I know not all games have daychat, but specifically for this setup,In post 1742, Gamma Emerald wrote:First post was me correcting a generalistic philosophy
I feel that point is relevant
."What did you mean by relevant? Do you feel someone specifically is doing what you said? If so why not point it out directly?
Second post was me suggesting a scumhunting tool I figured out from my own scumplay[/quote]In post 1742, Gamma Emerald wrote:First post was me correcting a generalistic philosophy
Again, like, what is the point? Do you feel someone has tried to discredit the conftownie yet? If not, then why did you say it when you can hold off on that thought was observe more if someone ~actually~ does do that "scumtell".
It feels like both posts read "Hey guys look I'm looking for scum in such and such ways I'm trying to figure the game out", meanwhile if you actually meant those two posts you wouldn't have made them until you feel someone has demonstrated such behavior.
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 2:00 pm
1) I felt it was imperative to correct that because HS seemed to rely on it a bit much
2) I'm p sure someone did that by then or some point in the game
2) I'm p sure someone did that by then or some point in the game
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 2:02 pm
WhoIn post 1744, Gamma Emerald wrote:I'm p sure someone did that by then or some point in the game
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 2:03 pm
Are you saying why I'm not asking people about their reads instead of pointing out the lack?In post 1741, Dunnstral wrote: But why not ask people questions if you're curious?
Because when I tried to interact with people this happened
In post 1702, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote: However, I am literally baffled by how literally everyone is ignoring MDS while she gives 0 concrete reads. Literally waffle posts
In post 1703, The_Jester wrote:Literally her 2 posts back
Mini's town, leave her alone.In post 1591, MiniDeathStar wrote:Town pairs for me so far:
Cerb/Nahdia
Jester/Mini
HS/Parama
(Jester thinks Maria/Shadow is town, too, but I'm not too sure)
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 2:05 pm
It was the mhsmith/IS argument that made me think of that
Not really scumreading either (smith is null, IS is leantown), but I felt it was relevant
Not really scumreading either (smith is null, IS is leantown), but I felt it was relevant
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 2:06 pm
I meant why not ask about their pt? Do you think only you have stuff in yours
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 2:07 pm
1. I don't feel HS was relying on it "a bit much" at all? It felt like an off-handed comment by her.In post 1744, Gamma Emerald wrote:1) I felt it was imperative to correct that because HS seemed to rely on it a bit much
2) I'm p sure someone did that by then or some point in the game
2. ??? Who? And if so why don't you have a stronger scumread on them if it's one of your strong scumtells? Esp because you just pointed out to me you think Maria is town and Shadow is scum (so I'm gonna guess you have no more ~strong~ reads).
Pedit: Ugh this is what I mean they felt so detached from reality like they didn't look like you believed in them as much as them saying "hey guys look I have these ~tools~ that I am using to catch ~scum~".