Mafiascum.net

tbh as long as I can get some coordination going with the loverizer it's literally impossible that we lose this game unless the scums have roleblockers which would suck big time

Claimed and or Softed:
mastina - Hated @ 25, guaranteed mislynch
Jingle - gated IC Neighbor
Wagonomics - Neighbor+
EeveeLution Army - Neighbor+
nomnomnom - Vig
Pine - Loverizer?
ofrhz - activation mirrors Pine
rosterfoster - Lots of Deaths @ 25 posters, 'Good Things' at even posters.

The rest:
PenguinPower
Titus
Who
Lavender
Ausuka

The rest haven't claimed. I'm guessing 1 of Eevee/Wagon is scum, but I'll come back to that. Not a pressing concern by any means. At most 1 of ofhrz/Pine is scum. roster highest probability of being full of shit.

Ofhrz, how does your power compare (power wise, not role wise) to Pine/nom?

idk how to compare them lol

actually Lavender could be scum.

In post 1728, ofrhz wrote:idk how to compare them lol

Their roles are probably stronger

Selling letters A!
1 dollar/ letter, PM me if interested.

So...
{Pine, ofrhz}
{Pine, nom}
{EV, Wagon}

All of these are not S/S.

I am townreading Wagon, mastina and Pine. The survivor retraction into vig makes me 90% sure on mastina town. Similar level on Wagon, significantly less, but still a strong read, on Pine.
I am townleaning Titus, PP, Ausuka.
I'm willing to wait for noms' N1 kill.
I think ofrhz is town more often than I think he's scum, but I'm still waffly.

tbc, it was made explicit to me that in addition to my benefits, other people would get benefits at 100 people AND that these other people were told the same thing. Wagon's attempt to get to 100 is probably town because giving an unspecified number of town players powers in return for any scum power is probably a bad plan.

by the way PP implied a post restriction of some sort earlier.

In post 1688, Jingle wrote:Rooster has crumbed venge/ss pretty hard, and I still wanna murder that. I need to poke wagon/Eevee in the neighborhood to see if I trust them.

I am none of those things.

Like we should lynch who.

If you want me to claim I will but it is rather unexcitijg.

In post 1736, rosterfoster wrote:Like we should lynch who.

Why?

In post 1737, Jingle wrote:

In post 1736, rosterfoster wrote:who

Why?

what?

I told you this game would be more interesting if we got admins to post

I never fail to deliver on my promises

In post 1738, Skygazer wrote:

In post 1737, Jingle wrote:

In post 1736, rosterfoster wrote:who

Why?

what?

Where?

In post 1740, Ausuka wrote:

In post 1738, Skygazer wrote:

In post 1737, Jingle wrote:

In post 1736, rosterfoster wrote:who

Why?

what?

Where?

when?

In post 1741, Skygazer wrote:

In post 1740, Ausuka wrote:

In post 1738, Skygazer wrote:

In post 1737, Jingle wrote:

In post 1736, rosterfoster wrote:who

Why?

what?

Where?

when?

Which?

Whomsoever?

But seriously, why do you want a Who lynch roster?

Because Who is scum.

We should be lynching scum.

Alternatively Lavender is acceptable.

You should have said how :/

Why is who scum?

Because he’s been saying scummy things.

I’m not going to be able to case him, but his motivations were clearly impure