Mafiascum.net

In post 1723, ChaosOmega wrote:

In post 1709, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1708, ChaosOmega wrote:I voted scum all day D2, you tried to derail their lim. Your posts seem to suck worse than mine on a surface level glance.

What are your thoughts on Alch and Luke?

I did no such thing.

You’re more than welcome to try to argue that incorrectly.

My thoughts are dependent on your alignment.

Also, you have no thoughts on them with a flipped scum that aren't dependent on my alignment? If you're town, you're pretty bad at mafia then.

Then I am pretty bad at mafia because I hunt via associatives.

if omega town, who's scum?

Math, vote chaos

In post 1659, ChaosOmega wrote:Also, I'd rather not claim, but there is a reason I had an about-face on Umlaut after N1 and had my vote locked on him all D2.

titus, can you unvote for a bit? it feels like an uncomfortable atmosphere right now.

In post 1694, MathBlade wrote:I am pretty sure of Datisi’s alignment he’s just not seeing something I am telling him which is *ugh*

UNVOTE: Chaos

Whatever you want

In post 1727, Not_Mafia wrote:Math, vote chaos

Nah. Not my style to hammer before claims and me voting Chaos would be a hammer. As you are hammer happy. I am pretty sure it will be BS but still gotta play it out to make sure.

In post 1726, Datisi wrote:if omega town, who's scum?

I don’t think it’s Luke, his push feels genuine
Still believe in the Titus+Math+Datisi town core
Koba replaced Vulture right? I could definitely see that slot as scum

In post 1725, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1723, ChaosOmega wrote:

In post 1709, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1708, ChaosOmega wrote:I voted scum all day D2, you tried to derail their lim. Your posts seem to suck worse than mine on a surface level glance.

What are your thoughts on Alch and Luke?

I did no such thing.

You’re more than welcome to try to argue that incorrectly.

My thoughts are dependent on your alignment.

Also, you have no thoughts on them with a flipped scum that aren't dependent on my alignment? If you're town, you're pretty bad at mafia then.

Then I am pretty bad at mafia because I hunt via associatives.

And you're saying Luke and Alch have no associatives other than with me?

In post 1734, ChaosOmega wrote:

In post 1725, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1723, ChaosOmega wrote:

In post 1709, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1708, ChaosOmega wrote:I voted scum all day D2, you tried to derail their lim. Your posts seem to suck worse than mine on a surface level glance.

What are your thoughts on Alch and Luke?

I did no such thing.

You’re more than welcome to try to argue that incorrectly.

My thoughts are dependent on your alignment.

Also, you have no thoughts on them with a flipped scum that aren't dependent on my alignment? If you're town, you're pretty bad at mafia then.

Then I am pretty bad at mafia because I hunt via associatives.

And you're saying Luke and Alch have no associatives other than with me?

No I am saying that those associatives are dependent upon your flip.

There’s a lot of people who play and pull at strings.

How the prior day played out changed significantly based on your alignment.

If it’s SvS then you’re a scum PR so scum sacrificed Umlaut.
If it’s SvT then for some reason your wagon wasn’t pushed more.

What pushes are towny/scummy are literally dependent on your alignment

VOTE: Chaos

Since it’s not hammer anymore

In post 1722, Datisi wrote:yeah, y'all are welcome for trying to keep the obvious power role with a guilty alive, why is the omega wagon a thing again?

That's not what I was seeing. I don't think that was the consensus.

Not saying you're scum with Omega but I don't buy this but maybe I was wrong. I identified you as the slot with the guilty but it makes sense if you thought someone else did.

In post 1736, Titus wrote:

In post 1722, Datisi wrote:yeah, y'all are welcome for trying to keep the obvious power role with a guilty alive, why is the omega wagon a thing again?

That's not what I was seeing. I don't think that was the consensus.

Not saying you're scum with Omega but I don't buy this but maybe I was wrong. I identified you as the slot with the guilty but it makes sense if you thought someone else did.

*facepalm* Cries in sad.

Now that you’ve said that the entire time I was trying to shade Datisi poorly so he doesn’t get shot

You told me to be a Sophie and it’s really hard for me to manipulate scum kills when everyone is trying to be scummy. Like really freakin hard to Sophie this.

T3 was hard enough.

In post 1410, Titus wrote:

In post 1408, MathBlade wrote:Sometimes part of being a good Sophie is setting up the mark (scum) to make bad decisions. Think. You asked me to be a Sophie. Put it together.

True, but you're not effectuation your plan. You're not actually relieving pressure off Umlaut by not voting elsewhere. Your vote doesn't have to be on your biggest scumread.

In post 1411, MathBlade wrote:(Gibbs slap) I can’t know if I am being effective until tomorrow.

In post 1412, MathBlade wrote:And my point isn’t to relieve pressure off Umlaut if that isn’t clear enough already.

In post 1413, MathBlade wrote:What do you think of my Datisi Umlaut case?

How hard do I have to scream it? *sigh*

I was saying shade Datisi to save him ffs

Titus revote Chaos

In post 1388, Datisi wrote:

In post 1387, MathBlade wrote:I don’t think you follow me here. I am wondering if how sure you and others are if you/those more sure are scum.

sorry, i don't follow. could you please rephrase?

In post 1390, MathBlade wrote:Another way is to me you look more Townie if Umlaut flips town.
And I don’t want to elim you today but you are in my sus pool if Umlaut flips scum.

I don’t know if it’s enough to elim but you are sus.

I don’t want to elim you today.

This is like painful.

I have to get ready for work now.

But c’mon Titus.

Like fuck.

In post 1662, Datisi wrote:i thought the "umlaut, i was townreading you all of d1, now i'm voting you on d2" was very clear. which is also why i had a slight panic reaction this morning when i saw you were at an unannounced y-2.

I uh missed this.

@chaos, anyone with changed or maybe more confident read on today versus yesterday?

In post 1735, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1734, ChaosOmega wrote:

In post 1725, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1723, ChaosOmega wrote:

In post 1709, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1708, ChaosOmega wrote:I voted scum all day D2, you tried to derail their lim. Your posts seem to suck worse than mine on a surface level glance.

What are your thoughts on Alch and Luke?

I did no such thing.

You’re more than welcome to try to argue that incorrectly.

My thoughts are dependent on your alignment.

Also, you have no thoughts on them with a flipped scum that aren't dependent on my alignment? If you're town, you're pretty bad at mafia then.

Then I am pretty bad at mafia because I hunt via associatives.

And you're saying Luke and Alch have no associatives other than with me?

No I am saying that those associatives are dependent upon your flip.

There’s a lot of people who play and pull at strings.

How the prior day played out changed significantly based on your alignment.

If it’s SvS then you’re a scum PR so scum sacrificed Umlaut.
If it’s SvT then for some reason your wagon wasn’t pushed more.

What pushes are towny/scummy are literally dependent on your alignment

VOTE: Chaos

Since it’s not hammer anymore

So if my wagon wasn't pushed more even though I'm town, what does that tell you? You said if I flip scum Gamma and Luke are town, what reads of yours change if I flip town?

Chaos vote yourself

In post 1656, Datisi wrote:with n_m in game.

Oops. I wasn’t even thinking about NM when I voted.

In post 1675, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1659, ChaosOmega wrote:

In post 1569, ChaosOmega wrote:It feels like Gamma and Luke are both trying to pull momentum away from Umlaut here.

VOTE: Lukewarm

-----

Also, I'd rather not claim, but there is a reason I had an about-face on Umlaut after N1 and had my vote locked on him all D2.

Guessing it has to do with what Umlaut flipped?

Umlaut flipped neighbor, not neighborizor, so I feel like that would not result in a change over night, right?

Am I dense?

titus, i'm not scum with anyone :/

at first i voted umlaut because i wanted to see where it would go, but when i realized that it's a probable guilty in play, i tried to hammer that point home. i realized math probably figured it out, because the "lol datisi is scummier if umlaut scum" was too moonlogic. i think i tried to wink at him about it at some point, but i can't find it in my iso skim right now.

however, i have a hunch scum thought i was the one with the guilty too, which again makes me thonk on mathblade.

In post 1742, Lukewarm wrote:

In post 1662, Datisi wrote:i thought the "umlaut, i was townreading you all of d1, now i'm voting you on d2" was very clear. which is also why i had a slight panic reaction this morning when i saw you were at an unannounced y-2.

I uh missed this.

@chaos, anyone with changed or maybe more confident read on today versus yesterday?

If I had more results that I thought were relevant to claim, I would have.

In post 1678, Datisi wrote:right. it's a bit out there theory, but. umlaut went no effort shortly after you repped in. i know scumlaut is capable of efforting when he needs to and being a lazy fuck when he can get away with it.

obviously i know you're gonna say "coincidence" which is why i'm hoping others will knock some sense into me.

I thought Umlaut went quiet before Math joined the game.