Page 70 of 191
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 6:07 am
by Infinity 324
no one was really putting a lot of effort into sorting the callers until shiki asked them to and shiki asked people like pooky and the replacements specifically
i don't really see how this is anything except an excuse to scumread some people and not others
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 6:07 am
by PookyTheMagicalBear
the kind of quality analysis we were missing <3 Ydra
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 6:24 am
by Galron
This attribution or assumption of emotions to different players is a playstyle thing I guess? I don't really see the scum motivation for it, but it's annoying/strange. Do you do the same thing irl?
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 6:27 am
by ssbm_Kyouko
In post 1722, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:in my experience when there's 2 leading wagons and neither of the 2 have any solid/real read on the other wagon its probly just S/S
They both just repped in, though generally I'd agree. Enchant should at least be able to read S_S via Roden though
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 6:31 am
by Galron
In post 1690, rousseau wrote:
it feels like you are reading scared/nervous into its posts and keep saying so, and it kinda feels performative in a way, and you are kinda focused in a seemingly static way,
In post 1691, Tetrina wrote:They voted for Smart but then gave a reason about an exciting race instead of any reason to vote Smart because they're scared to
So this looks like you're (tetrina) doing this because you see something. I'm talking in general, so I guess it's a playstyle thing.
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 6:35 am
by PookyTheMagicalBear
In post 1728, ssbm_Kyouko wrote: In post 1722, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:in my experience when there's 2 leading wagons and neither of the 2 have any solid/real read on the other wagon its probly just S/S
They both just repped in, though generally I'd agree. Enchant should at least be able to read S_S via Roden though
true i guess that is an extenuating circumstance
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 6:35 am
by ssbm_Kyouko
VOTE: enchant
E-1 I think
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 6:37 am
by ssbm_Kyouko
Keep in mind this is plurality and if nobody reaches majority by deadline the first player to the tied VC will die
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 6:39 am
by rousseau
intent
enchant please claim
can wait for skitter responses
one more transmission
?
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 6:41 am
by ssbm_Kyouko
In post 1733, rousseau wrote:intent
enchant please claim
can wait for skitter responses
one more transmission
?
Since others have been unvoting both wagons, just going to state ftr that I'm not going to unvote to prevent a hammer, though I dont mind waiting for skitter and 1 more transmission.
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 6:42 am
by ssbm_Kyouko
Also enchant is in a different timezone I think, I think in Eurasia somewhere, so the claim may not come until after the transmission
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 6:44 am
by Galron
In post 1690, rousseau wrote:
it feels like you are reading scared/nervous into its posts and keep saying so, and it kinda feels performative in a way, and you are kinda focused in a seemingly static way,
S_S iso diving House/Enchant to get some sort of read and not coming up with anything pings me.
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 6:47 am
by PookyTheMagicalBear
Enchant is in Russia I think?
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 6:50 am
by Infinity 324
idk when skitt will have more time for this game but it would be nice to see her post when that happens
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 6:59 am
by Galron
In post 1717, skitter30 wrote: In post 1713, Something_Smart wrote:
Can you respond to
1704?
Like yeah I can see that if someone consistently focuses on the callers and avoids the players that can be scummy. But I was specifically directed to look at them, and they're a special mechanic of the game, so why wouldn't I try to understand them?
I think 1714 largely addresses that point, but lmk if i missed something
I owe a few things ro a few people, i'll be getting home this evening and will be able to answer more thorougjlh then
If you'd put me in the queue, everyone seems to have at least one person they're fairly confident is scum, but I'm not sure about you. I thought you had a fairly strong scum read on Inifinity, but these posts:
In post 1457, skitter30 wrote:I actually kinda think pooky is scum >.>
@infinity i will respond tomorrow night, im short on time atm and i have to go looking for past games
I'm kinda cool with the roden wagon.
Have a great weekend everyone!
In post 1640, skitter30 wrote:I had no townvibes on roden and i dont like ss's entrance thus far + enchant seems kinda clueless in a way that doesnt seem likely to be coming from someone with access to a scum pt
In post 1647, skitter30 wrote: In post 1643, rousseau wrote:(3) enchant: gamma emerald (1575), infinity 324 (1576), galron (1584)
(3) something smart: ssbm kyouko (1391), tetrina (1400), cephrir (1401)
Ty
I kinda like the formation of the ss wagon more tho
VOTE: ss
Kinda makes me think you're flaking a bit.
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 7:00 am
by Galron
I'm thinking, though, that if these really are s/s wagons a lot of what I'm confused about clears up. But I don't really like even suggesting they're s/s bc I don't see that very often.
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 7:05 am
by Galron
And really, there' s a lot of indecisiveness in general, myself included.
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 7:07 am
by Galron
In post 1344, skitter30 wrote: In post 1341, Infinity 324 wrote:@skitt i'm trying to find that out. most likely i'm going to try to protect my trs and join the biggest non-tr wagon. but i may do some more sorting of ceph and roden if they're here.
I think i'm actually rethinking my scumread of you >.>
I dont know who to vote tho rn
There's this. That partially answers my question.
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 7:13 am
by Something_Smart
In post 1720, skitter30 wrote:Ok it read to me like you were building up to pushing them for lack of content, but i wasnf sure, so i asked
I feel like the context is pretty clear if you read the previous posts...
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 7:14 am
by Something_Smart
In post 1722, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:in my experience when there's 2 leading wagons and neither of the 2 have any solid/real read on the other wagon its probly just S/S
Excuse me for not having a read on a 20 post slot, I guess?
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 7:14 am
by Galron
What do you see there? What's scum!rousseau's motivation for not mis-characterizing posts, engaging with everyone, not cherry-picking, etc. Unless this is a long con, I don't see mafia there.
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 7:16 am
by Something_Smart
In post 1736, Galron wrote:S_S iso diving House/Enchant to get some sort of read and not coming up with anything pings me.
How so? What in that ISO would you expect me to get a read from?
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 7:16 am
by Something_Smart
Even more than that, what would be my scum motivation to pretend not to have a read there?
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 7:21 am
by PookyTheMagicalBear
it's not really about not having a read on a 20 post slot
the other viable elim is you and you should know your own alignment
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2021 7:23 am
by Something_Smart
Well I mean, I have no issues with executing Enchant, but that's different from actively scumreading them.
