Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2022 5:36 pm
i like this, lolIn post 1716, fireisredsir wrote:that's bayes baybee
i like this, lolIn post 1716, fireisredsir wrote:that's bayes baybee
i think its cause sometimes here it kinda feels like you're following a formula and that reads as unnatural. like there's not much depth to it, it's a shallow read that doesn't feel like it has much thought behind it. maybe that's just how you play and you're very strict about following your scumtells and towntells by the letter but i also at other times have gotten the impression that you don't do that and that you like more nuance. so it's weird when you doIn post 1727, wavemode wrote:If I townread someone for something and they continue to play the exact same way, what, I'm supposed to scumread them now? like neither of you are making any sense here
Uh, only here for like 10 mins rn,In post 1730, Nero Cain wrote:Hockey are you going to be on for a bit?
Fair, but mafia can do the same thing as Stephen no? Continue to play the same way beingIn post 1724, wavemode wrote:if you're asking me why I think he's town, I've given those reasons. If you want me to restate it or rephrase it somehow, okay I can explain it again I guess? But I don't really know how to answer a question like why am I confident in my own townread. I just am? it strikes me as a strange question, like why is anyone confident in things they believe? because they believe themIn post 1721, HockeyFan wrote:"why you're so adamant on tring him for consistency"
i just wanted to talk about how you called me and FA's "1v1" bs and then said you wanted to resolve it by voting one of us out. I asked you about it earlier and you didn't respondIn post 1732, HockeyFan wrote:Uh, only here for like 10 mins rn,In post 1730, Nero Cain wrote:Hockey are you going to be on for a bit?
will be on for a bit(alot) after around 4pm EST tomorrow, I can be a lot more active from tomorrow to Monday
okay, true. but I consider that less likely than the alternative possiblity where he's townIn post 1733, HockeyFan wrote:Fair, but mafia can do the same thing as Stephen no?
sorry, should have clarified what i meant by "bs", what i meant was "bs" is that it was not really getting anywhere anymore, and u 2 were running around in circles, and yes i want to vote one of u otu since i believe it was a t/s "bs"In post 1734, Nero Cain wrote:i just wanted to talk about how you called me and FA's "1v1" bs and then said you wanted to resolve it by voting one of us out. I asked you about it earlier and you didn't respondIn post 1732, HockeyFan wrote:Uh, only here for like 10 mins rn,In post 1730, Nero Cain wrote:Hockey are you going to be on for a bit?
will be on for a bit(alot) after around 4pm EST tomorrow, I can be a lot more active from tomorrow to Monday
I mean you're right. I saw the name Butterchurn and my mind blanked and I thought of Polish rap but you were indeed talking about another game.In post 1573, Greeting wrote:butterchurn wasn't scum in that game, but I don't expect you to be caring about that either.In post 1433, Nero Cain wrote:scum doesn't have confirmation biasIn post 1426, Greeting wrote:Just like butterchurn had confirmation bias over me in Newbie 2086.
Reinforcing my commitment to voting outNero Cain.
VOTE: Nero Cain
big fish in a small pond, thank youIn post 1611, Greeting wrote:But I think Nero Cain is a far bigger fish to fry.
I may be a Jedi master but I can't put thoughts in anyone's heads. You're basically saying that you don't like my content and dismissing it as not content.In post 1611, Greeting wrote:My main issue with Nero Cain currently is that for most of the game he's been planting seeds of suspicion
look at how dishonest this is. Your half ass RVS posts are not part of my case, I was questioning why Wave was town reading you for those "half ass RVS" postIn post 1611, Greeting wrote:It honestly blows my mind that he even resorted to analysing my half-RVS posts in 1539. That's how weak the case is
holy shit. I wasn't doing that either.In post 1616, Greeting wrote:If he's using it to try to sway wavemode into my miselimination then it is part of my case.
In post 1738, Nero Cain wrote:then why didn't you vote one of us?
because at the time, I wanted Andante more(cuz i thoughe she was scummier), I ALSO thought your guys interaction was t/s, and yes u can have 2 thougths at the same time!In post 1739, Nero Cain wrote:and you said earlier that I looked towny in the interaction but you downgraded me to null b/c I'm "experienced" If I'm scum why not just call me scum? if she's scum are you really that scared to vote her?