Mafiascum.net

Let’s chill the fuck out a second here.

In post 1724, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:like you're basically scum siding clown show

Speaking of scum siding clown shows:

In post 906, schadd_ wrote:Not_Mafia replaces Gamma Emerald

I forgot about this. I had a pretty solid Town read on Gamma in this game. This causes NM to also be invited to the Towncore.

In post 1723, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:VOTE: frogster

this slot is town but if we dont elim him we will lose this game

In post 1720, Frogsterking wrote:Okay, why are you focused on my vote in particular though? IIRC I don't think I was even the first one to FoS you.

oh so pooky is town

UNVOTE: Pooky

You do what you think is best Pooky. I don't really care. If you think it would help Math have a realization moment, please do.

In post 1729, Titus wrote:UNVOTE: Pooky

You do what you think is best Pooky. I don't really care. If you think it would help Math have a realization moment, please do.

I am curious do you think the wagon on Pooky is still pure?

I have three hours of driving ahead of me. I won't be responsive. As long as no speed hammer, I don't care.

In post 1730, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1729, Titus wrote:UNVOTE: Pooky

You do what you think is best Pooky. I don't really care. If you think it would help Math have a realization moment, please do.

I am curious do you think the wagon on Pooky is still pure?

Yes, but I'm too tired to reset and things are ongoing.

In post 1732, Titus wrote:

In post 1730, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1729, Titus wrote:UNVOTE: Pooky

You do what you think is best Pooky. I don't really care. If you think it would help Math have a realization moment, please do.

I am curious do you think the wagon on Pooky is still pure?

Yes, but I'm too tired to reset and things are ongoing.

Yeah I really would strongly recommend filling in the blanks Pooky

Because I don’t think that’s a Townie answer.

Maybe Titus is exhausted but I don’t think Titus doesn’t reevaluate in the face of new information.

I’d really love something that would help fill that in.

Then I can announce my plan.

Literally just said I was too tired to reset.....

In post 1727, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1723, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:VOTE: frogster

this slot is town but if we dont elim him we will lose this game

In post 1720, Frogsterking wrote:Okay, why are you focused on my vote in particular though? IIRC I don't think I was even the first one to FoS you.

because you're incapable of reading

I mean I don't think it's a great idea for me to fill in the blanks and I'm the one with the result and I'm saying Titus is probly town for it so ???

like I'll fill in the blanks if Titus wants me to prove that I actually have a result on her but I don't see why I would do it if she believes me

In post 1737, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:like I'll fill in the blanks if Titus wants me to prove that I actually have a result on her but I don't see why I would do it if she believes me

Because I am an investigative TPR.

In post 1735, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 1727, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1723, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:VOTE: frogster

this slot is town but if we dont elim him we will lose this game

In post 1720, Frogsterking wrote:Okay, why are you focused on my vote in particular though? IIRC I don't think I was even the first one to FoS you.

because you're incapable of reading

This feels like pooky!scum tbh

In post 1738, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1737, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:like I'll fill in the blanks if Titus wants me to prove that I actually have a result on her but I don't see why I would do it if she believes me

Because I am an investigative TPR.

do you want all the investigative TPRs to claim ? :/

In post 1740, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 1738, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1737, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:like I'll fill in the blanks if Titus wants me to prove that I actually have a result on her but I don't see why I would do it if she believes me

Because I am an investigative TPR.

do you want all the investigative TPRs to claim ? :/

Let’s assume you’re truthtelling in being a PR.

Then what TPR when Titus doesn’t care shouldn’t very well matter.

If you are a TPR then protectives on you already.

It’s not like being more or less specific makes you more or less dead.

And no I think you and I are the only claims needed.

In post 1733, MathBlade wrote:Maybe Titus is exhausted but I don’t think Titus doesn’t reevaluate in the face of new information.

I think she has a reason to believe what she believes and its anti-town to get her to say why.

In post 1741, MathBlade wrote:If you are a TPR then protectives on you already.

in a game with multiple investigatives I dont think we have any protectives

In post 1743, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 1741, MathBlade wrote:If you are a TPR then protectives on you already.

in a game with multiple investigatives I dont think we have any protectives

Then in that world if you’re town you’re dead anyway so might as well share it.

I has reason to think there’s protectives though.

In post 1740, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:

In post 1738, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1737, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:like I'll fill in the blanks if Titus wants me to prove that I actually have a result on her but I don't see why I would do it if she believes me

Because I am an investigative TPR.

do you want all the investigative TPRs to claim ? :/

This is projection imo

So my suggestion: if you’re willing to take it, is to fill in the blanks.

Then soon as you do, I out my crumbs and see if we can get a circle of confirms.

In post 1746, MathBlade wrote:So my suggestion: if you’re willing to take it, is to fill in the blanks.

Then soon as you do, I out my crumbs and see if we can get a circle of confirms.

alright let's wait for titus to have a think about it and if she wants to i'll claim my info on her

;

;