Mafiascum.net

Hey, it worked!

"I don't like" =/= Voteworthy
You say that DGB looks like town trying to stop a wagon; I say that DGB kind of looks like scum trying to throw suspicion at people on the zwet wagon D2. It's not voteworthy, but it's noteworthy.
You say that I'm trying to set up mislynches later, but the exact same argument can be made for DGB.
Also, I don't get how any of my posts imply scum knowledge.

DGB, reading your posts, I have two possibilities.

1) You don't think he's scum because you believe his "tone." In which case, I simply disagree with you on the tone, and even if thats true, I am much more likely to read actions than "tone."

2) You're soft-claiming mason, in which case just get it out in the open. This guy is going to be lynched today if you don't, and maybe even if you do.

Kmd4390 wrote:

Vote Zwet

Yosarian2 wrote:Ideally, I would like to see him dead before he gets to post again, just in case he is a scum dayvig. I am 100% serious about this.

This is a good point. If he's scum dayvig, I don't want to give him a chance to shoot a townie.

DGB is my second suspect right now.

One thing about zwet, is, in my mind, absolutely certain.

He's no dayvig.

DrippingGoofball wrote:

Kmd4390 wrote:

Vote Zwet

Yosarian2 wrote:Ideally, I would like to see him dead before he gets to post again, just in case he is a scum dayvig. I am 100% serious about this.

This is a good point. If he's scum dayvig, I don't want to give him a chance to shoot a townie.

DGB is my second suspect right now.

One thing about zwet, is, in my mind, absolutely certain.

He's no dayvig.

..and now, by the laws of irony, he will re-appear in the thread and dayvig a cop.

By the by: He's -3 right now, by my (unofficial) count.

Thestatusquo wrote:By the by: He's -3 right now, by my (unofficial) count.

Thanks.

I don't want to see any more votes on zwet.

I want everyone to take a step back, and cool their heads. Though zwet certainly has given the scum the gift of the world's easiest auto-wagon, there is no way that we should let them have an easy time of it, and let the scum control today's lynch, AND tonight's nightkill.

The lynch belongs to the town. We must not allow the scum to rush us. I believe they are trying to rush us.

- and with this vote, I have signed my own death warrant for the NK, haha.

By the way, zwet is in fact at -2 because I have the power to give someone an extra vote, and that person is currently voting for zwet.

Someone unvote zwet nao.

Why are you voting for me?

I have explained my reasoning for disagreeing with your categorization of the situation very thoroughly.

Theoretically, if you were going to vote someone for the Zwet wagon, it would be yosarian2, who suggested that we should lynch him before he could post again. (which, I do, actually agree with) or caboose, who seems to have jumped on it pretty opportunistically.

Your vote makes no sense to me. THen again, your actions very rarely do. lol.

Also, silly DGB, you don't need to vote for me. I would NK you any time I have a NK. No questions asked.

DGB!

You're going to have to give us more reason to unvote him than "he could be a mason"

Ok? Ok.

Either his mason partner (I doubt there is such a person) is going to have to claim, or you're going to have to give us Role based info that he's not scum, which it sounds like you don't have.

Every single action he has taken today has been a scum motivated action.

DrippingGoofball wrote:By the way, zwet is in fact at -2 because I have the power to give someone an extra vote, and that person is currently voting for zwet.

Someone unvote zwet nao.

Would that person know if they have a double vote or not?

10 to lynch

zwetschenwasser: 8 (hasdgfas, Thestatusquo, Caboose, qwints, Yosarian2, scotmany12, sam.samhorn, Kmd4390)
DrippingGoofball: 3 (farside22, zwetschenwasser, CounselWolf)
camn: 1 (Jebus)
farside22: 1 (populartajo)
populartajo: 1 (camn)
Thestatusquo: 1 (DrippingGoofball)

Not Voting: 4 (Simenon, stark, crywolf20084)

scotmany is voting for 2 people on that list.

DGB, what makes you so sure Zwet isn't a dayvig?

Votecount fixed, again. -OGML

I am also inclined to kill zwet. I like short-ish day1s.

Zwet.. do you have to say about your bizarre claiming?

Thestatusquo wrote:Theoretically, if you were going to vote someone for the Zwet wagon, it would be yosarian2, who suggested that we should lynch him before he could post again. (which, I do, actually agree with) or caboose, who seems to have jumped on it pretty opportunistically.

Sure, these would be fine places to put my vote, but why not you?

Thestatusquo wrote:Also, silly DGB, you don't need to vote for me. I would NK you any time I have a NK. No questions asked.

True, that. And you'd get away with it, too, screaming WIFOM.

Kmd4390 wrote:

Mod, you have me voting both Zwet and Camn. I am currently voting Zwet

DGB, what makes you so sure Zwet isn't a dayvig?

I know how the kid's mind works. He wanted to stimulate discussion. He'd claim scum if he thought it would get us going. Hey maybe he's done that before? Hmmm, yeah.

Now I have to think, which players here KNOW zwet's meta, and are shouting for his quicklynch? These players are surely scum. I'm going to quietly go and check where zwet's meta has previously manifested itself, and which players are common between those games, and this one.



No one put another vote on zwet until I have completed this task. It will be done tomorrow.

I'm actually William Wallace, and I can target someone every night. If the person is nightkilled, then I die instead. I'm your official martyr, folks, and TSQ is scum.

zwetschenwasser wrote:I'm actually William Wallace, and I can target someone every night. If the person is nightkilled, then I die instead. I'm your official martyr, folks, and TSQ is scum.

Oy vey... you make my head spin.

But TSQ scum.

My new claim is not a lie.

DrippingGoofball wrote:

Kmd4390 wrote:

Mod, you have me voting both Zwet and Camn. I am currently voting Zwet

DGB, what makes you so sure Zwet isn't a dayvig?

I know how the kid's mind works. He wanted to stimulate discussion. He'd claim scum if he thought it would get us going. Hey maybe he's done that before? Hmmm, yeah.

Now I have to think, which players here KNOW zwet's meta, and are shouting for his quicklynch? These players are surely scum. I'm going to quietly go and check where zwet's meta has previously manifested itself, and which players are common between those games, and this one.

I will name the scum.

No one put another vote on zwet until I have completed this task. It will be done tomorrow.

You're really, really, grasping at straws here. Zwet has claimed three different times now, with each claim suspiciously coming after the town decided zwet isn't scum.

I've claimed twice, sam. You're scum fabricating info.

zwetschenwasser wrote:I'm actually William Wallace, and I can target someone every night. If the person is nightkilled, then I die instead. I'm your official martyr, folks, and TSQ is scum.

Nice OMGUS there. You're so scum.

On a side note: DGB, I count 8 people voting Zwet, and there were 8 votes on him in the votecount. Will this double vote thing show up in the votecount, or is there actually one more vote on him then is showing up now? That would make him at lynch -1.

*sigh* It's not an OMGUS, it's a reaction logic vote thing.

Martyr? Pretty sure what you described is a bodyguard...

sam.samhorn wrote:Zwet has claimed three different times now, with each claim suspiciously coming after the town decided zwet isn't scum.

Show me where the town has decided that zwet isn't scum.