Mafiascum.net

woah shit. Game is now on my bookmarks.

@Mod, I don't think rewq still has his vote on my slot. I it's on HelloNewman, but I'm not certain.

@rewq, why is your vote on HelloNewman again? At most, the three wagons are you, Vifam, and gbevil. I'd like your thoughts on any of those.

He is OMGUSing me.

Oh, right then. I want to see rewq do something not-retarded with his vote now. Failing that, I'd be more than comfortable with lynching him.

My activity should drop starting now. Still here, though.

I'll accept rewq or gbevil lynch. I prefer the latter, but only slightly more so.

VOTE: Gbevil

If no one likes the Vifam case, then on to my second suspect.

HellloooNewman wrote:He is OMGUSing me.

You will not state your case on me.

rewq455 wrote:You will not state your case on me.

An OMGUS vote is still an OMGUS vote. Nothing you've done this game struck me as terribly pro-town, and you've still yet to lay down a vote on one of the wagons.

VOTE: rewq455

killerjester wrote:

rewq455 wrote:You will not state your case on me.

An OMGUS vote is still an OMGUS vote. Nothing you've done this game struck me as terribly pro-town, and you've still yet to lay down a vote on one of the wagons.

VOTE: rewq455

Its not an OMGUS vote. I said i was voting him because he voted me while refusing to explaining it. That is a scum tell is it not?

The case on me seems to be that I'm defending Morthas.



As I've said before, he's simply a gut townread, along with Sethos, thus calling it Town V Town early in the game. Usually your gut calls reads before your mind does.


I've been seriously not giving enough attention to this game. I apologize whole heartily for that.

I'm not sure I agree with Rewqscum.

killerjester wrote:

rewq455 wrote:You will not state your case on me.

An OMGUS vote is still an OMGUS vote. Nothing you've done this game struck me as terribly pro-town, and you've still yet to lay down a vote on one of the wagons.

VOTE: rewq455

What is he supposesdly supposed to do? When he is being voted without a decent reasoning, what should be his course of action? HellooooooNewman's holding out and you're just letting him on while he pushes a wagon he can't even justify. That's ridiculous.



VOTE: HelloNewman

EBWOP:


The gbw case is pretty freaking sufficient too, but we need to get the ball rolling in someone else direction for a bit.

Vifam wrote:What is he supposesdly supposed to do? When he is being voted without a decent reasoning, what should be his course of action? HellooooooNewman's holding out and you're just letting him on while he pushes a wagon he can't even justify. That's ridiculous.

I found his justification decent. It was, essentially, rewq was being an all-around VI tossing his vote around. The one on Morthas was excusable if you believe it was still in RVS, but there really wasn't a point for putting a second vote on Acronach. And then there was the whole...

rewq455 wrote:

HellloooNewman wrote:

Vote Rewq455

For trying to......well, I dunno WHAT the fuck he is trying to do. It sure ain't pro town though.

So you dont know what i'm doing but its not helping the town... Give me an example and maybe i can help you out. Also, what are you doing at all?

"I'm TOTALLY doing something! I don't know what you're talking about. Besides, what are YOU doing?"

rewq455 wrote:

HellloooNewman wrote:Why do the accumulation of your posts all sound like "I'm rubber, you're glue, whatever you say to me comes back to you"?

Why don't you ISO me and read my posts? I have only defended myself in one post, so that is the only one which you can describe as an "I'm rubber, you're glue, whatever you say to me comes back to you" response. Last time I checked, 1/10 is not enough to make a generalization like that.
I decided to ISO you. Post 1 is you answering the questions. Posts 2-4 are you justifying lurking. Post 5 is you giving a relatively unjustified vote on me. Post 6 is you avoiding justifying your vote on me. Avoiding justification is in no case pro-town. Anyone else agree?

UNVOTE:
VOTE: HellloooNewman

Again, "I have no idea what you're talking about! Besides, you're MUCH scummier than I am! >proceed to vote"

Tu quoque is not a legitimate defense. Beyond that, rewq is getting progressively more frustrated the more he sees it not working. I'm voting rewq because he's harboring his vote from the other wagons and trying to throw his suspicions back on Newman.

hmm.


This seems like a basic scum bussing tactic to me.

EBWOP:

And by that, I mean, Rewq's and Newman's back and forth does nothing but try to put over the other with silly logic / No logic at all. KJ just kind of proved that.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Rewq


If they are bussing, I'm going for the strongest wagon.

I am at L-1. I am too busy IRL right now to even attampt to make a good post. Please give me 24 hrs to create one before hammering if you are thinking to. I guess this is a good time to claim too. I claim Fenix.

That wasn't a very good claim.


Full role please.

I dont like the rewq wagon.

kiwieagle wrote:I dont like the rewq wagon.

He isn't even fully claiming, he just gave us a name :/.

isnt Fenix the leader of the Raynors Raiders?

kiwieagle wrote:isnt Fenix the leader of the Raynors Raiders?

I don't know, that's why I want a fullclaim :/

Here is my full claim:

Name: Fenix (he is in the first game and brood wars which i havent played so anything i can tell you flavor-wise is from a wiki. He is protoss so cannot be the leader of the raiders.)

Ability: After death I can cast One vote at any point later in the game, and then I can also remove it. After I looked over the wiki I saw that after he dies he is made into a Dragoon so he can continue fighting. This is the only thing I've read about him that works with this power flavor-wise

prod avoid. been busy, will post tomorrow.

rewq455 wrote:Here is my full claim:

Name: Fenix (he is in the first game and brood wars which i havent played so anything i can tell you flavor-wise is from a wiki. He is protoss so cannot be the leader of the raiders.)

Ability: After death I can cast One vote at any point later in the game, and then I can also remove it. After I looked over the wiki I saw that after he dies he is made into a Dragoon so he can continue fighting. This is the only thing I've read about him that works with this power flavor-wise

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat?

Vifam wrote:

rewq455 wrote:Here is my full claim:

Name: Fenix (he is in the first game and brood wars which i havent played so anything i can tell you flavor-wise is from a wiki. He is protoss so cannot be the leader of the raiders.)

Ability: After death I can cast One vote at any point later in the game, and then I can also remove it. After I looked over the wiki I saw that after he dies he is made into a Dragoon so he can continue fighting. This is the only thing I've read about him that works with this power flavor-wise

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat?

Lets pretend I was lynched today. Then on lets say Day 3 if I saw someone as really scummy, I could vote for him. I only have 1 vote though.