Mafiascum.net

I think I need to look through some of your previous games Wake, because your posts here are so LAMIST-y.

I'll do that when I get home.

BB popped his head in here momentarily... are you still voting Lucky? What are you going to do with it now that you've assessed he may be town, "or at least not lynchworthy today"?

What do you like about gam?

In post 175, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:I think I need to look through some of your previous games Wake, because your posts here are so LAMIST-y.

I'll do that when I get home.

BB popped his head in here momentarily... are you still voting Lucky? What are you going to do with it now that you've assessed he may be town, "or at least not lynchworthy today"?

What do you like about gam?

That doesn't make much sense, but you can say what you've got to say.

Who in this game believes I am Town?

In post 177, Wake1 wrote:Who in this game believes I am Town?

I'm leaning scum the way you are derailing aggressiveness.

In post 178, Lucky2u wrote:

In post 177, Wake1 wrote:Who in this game believes I am Town?

I'm leaning scum the way you are derailing aggressiveness.

Why is that, if I may ask?

I think you want to be in a position of not having been on a town lynch wagon. Your not attacking anyone so you can't be blamed if you turn out to be wrong today. It's a very safe scum strat.

In post 180, Lucky2u wrote:I think you want to be in a position of not having been on a town lynch wagon. Your not attacking anyone so you can't be blamed if you turn out to be wrong today. It's a very safe scum strat.

Why would you assume that?

I value caution, not aggression.

Mislynches should be avoided.

In post 175, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:What do you like about gam?

His love of mafia

But I don't know if that's alignment relevent. I'm still deciding if his bad hop on is scummy.

In post 177, Wake1 wrote:Who in this game believes I am Town?

Not me.

Granted I don't think you're scum either yet.

I'm having trouble reading you this game.

In post 184, Does Bo Know wrote:

In post 177, Wake1 wrote:Who in this game believes I am Town?

Not me.

Granted I don't think you're scum either yet.

I'm having trouble reading you this game.

Interesting.

Why?

I don't know.

In post 186, Does Bo Know wrote:I don't know.

On all three counts?

Which past games of mine are you using for reference?

I hadn't looked into your past games.

I'm too lazy.

Why are you making me look into your past games?

In post 188, Does Bo Know wrote:I hadn't looked into your past games.

I'm too lazy.

Why are you making me look into your past games?

If you are trying to read me...

...wouldn't you consider my past games as a frame of reference?

Not while I'm phone posting, thus not caring to reread your play this game and other past games at the moment.

Prod dodge, back tomorrow.

But either way I think it's gonna be pointless to even try looking into your past games. I usually don't change my mind by reading past metas in games I'm not in.

Wake, I think you are making a lot of busy noise to make it look like you are doing something but you are actually doing nothing.

VOTE: wake

In post 190, Does Bo Know wrote:Not while I'm phone posting, thus not caring to reread your play this game and other past games at the moment.

In post 192, Does Bo Know wrote:But either way I think it's gonna be pointless to even try looking into your past games. I usually don't change my mind by reading past metas in games I'm not in.

If I may, what are you basing your reads on, then?

^^Yeah, Wake's questions to me seem pretty lame. Trying to know exactly why I can't read him well this game?

But don't switch over, I wasn't done with the Gam wagon yet.

In post 194, Wake1 wrote:

In post 190, Does Bo Know wrote:Not while I'm phone posting, thus not caring to reread your play this game and other past games at the moment.

In post 192, Does Bo Know wrote:But either way I think it's gonna be pointless to even try looking into your past games. I usually don't change my mind by reading past metas in games I'm not in.

If I may, what are you basing your reads on, then?

Whether your aggressiveness toward ETL has been townie or scummy.

I'd need to go back and read that later. That's something I will do and not be a waste of time.

In post 195, Does Bo Know wrote:^^Yeah, Wake's questions to me seem pretty lame. Trying to know exactly why I can't read him well this game?

But don't switch over, I wasn't done with the Gam wagon yet.

Fortunately for you, we cannot discuss ongoing games.

My questions are valid, and I ask you them because I'm trying to understand you. There's nothing lame about it, and I challenge how you judge which questions are lame and which are valid. If a question is game-related, it is valid. Do you disagree with this?

In post 196, Does Bo Know wrote:

In post 194, Wake1 wrote:

In post 190, Does Bo Know wrote:Not while I'm phone posting, thus not caring to reread your play this game and other past games at the moment.

In post 192, Does Bo Know wrote:But either way I think it's gonna be pointless to even try looking into your past games. I usually don't change my mind by reading past metas in games I'm not in.

If I may, what are you basing your reads on, then?

Whether your aggressiveness toward ETL has been townie or scummy.

I'd need to go back and read that later. That's something I will do and not be a waste of time.

I have not been aggressive, Bo. Cautiousness is my nature, not aggression.

So there's no aggression on my part. If you feel there is, I'd like to read what you're reading, in order to understand what you're thinking.

I just think the questions you're asking me are more or less not going to matter.

You're basically asking me about my read on you.

And I'm telling you I don't know why I can't read you.

But you keep pestering me about my inability to read you when you could be trying to focus on other things.

And I'm gonna go ahead and predict you're going to ask "Like what other things?"

And I'm gonna go ahead and answer "I don't know" again.