Mafiascum.net

That would be too easy right?

Probably.

↑ Flameaxe wrote:I agree with catboisarian2

ps the your mom jokes are meaningless for reads stop it

I think the sentiment was thats scotmany wasn't saying anything substantive, which, sure, but also it's page 7 of a large game, so I'm not really going to care if someone is low-content right now.

↑ catboi wrote:

↑ Aj The Epic wrote:At this point, it's right in line with my general play.

True. But he said his reasoning was in his last post. Ignoring that is...questionable.

I read his reasoning. It's also obvious because that's where he called SC's vote weak. But then he's making assertions that SC is waiting for a wagon of 5 (of 10) to blow over. And of course "trying to find scum on it". You know my opinion on that.


P-edit lol keep reaching

↑ curiouskarmadog wrote:one of these people on the Coug wagon tell me what this wagon on Coug is about?....thinking am missing it.

Well his vote on spiffeh was just awful, as his reasoning was simply that spiffeh didnt defend himself against a completely subjective, gutbased case. I haven't liked his interaction with spiffeh either.

Yo, spiffeh. Question for you. What made my vote on SC bad, but not notscience's?

I'd really like marquis to explain why he thinks catboi is obvtown, cause I'm not seeing it.

↑ curiouskarmadog wrote:one of these people on the Coug wagon tell me what this wagon on Coug is about?....thinking am missing it.

don't you find it the least bit strange that strangerkitty is only interacting with only like 2 pple? I mean that alone shld be noteworthy I wld think.

I for 1 am wondering why he is ignoring the person who started his wagon especially since I made a specific reference to a game we were in that he shld have picked up on. don't you find that weird?

↑ scotmany12 wrote:Yo, spiffeh. Question for you. What made my vote on SC bad, but not notscience's?

This is a fair point. My initial thought was that your justification was basically a glorified "yeah what he said" to make it look like you were contributing original thoughts which was probably jumping the gun. I am also more familiar with notscience and am not too phased if he does something unconventional, but I you're right I did kind of single you out without much reason.

↑ Aj The Epic wrote:I read his reasoning. It's also obvious because that's where he called SC's vote weak. But then he's making assertions that SC is waiting for a wagon of 5 (of 10) to blow over. And of course "trying to find scum on it". You know my opinion on that.

Tell me, did you find Marquis' case against me compelling? Like I said, I don't see how SC can get a solid enough scum read from Marquis' admittedly weak case on me to vote, but makes no attempt to analyze anything on his own wagon and basically ignores at least half the people on it. Would you ignore a wagon on you if you were/are town?

↑ Spiffeh wrote:

↑ Aj The Epic wrote:I read his reasoning. It's also obvious because that's where he called SC's vote weak. But then he's making assertions that SC is waiting for a wagon of 5 (of 10) to blow over. And of course "trying to find scum on it". You know my opinion on that.

Tell me, did you find Marquis' case against me compelling? Like I said, I don't see how SC can get a solid enough scum read from Marquis' admittedly weak case on me to vote, but makes no attempt to analyze anything on his own wagon and basically ignores at least half the people on it. Would you ignore a wagon on you if you were/are town?

It's a page 5 case, I don't expect much from those. He also didn't say marquis' case is good or bad, he didn't like your response. Tell me honestly, did you misread that or are you misrepresenting him?

However, I don't like you saying his case was 'admittedly weak' because marquis' ISO never shows him saying his case on you was anything of that sort. In 135 he says in your iso, post 60 is a scum lean but removed totally post 60 is town leanish. So what are you referring to here?

For ignoring wagons on you (or, in this case, him)? Independent of player. I don't mess with early wagons on me much because I don't play well in RVS.

hiiii

↑ pirate mollie wrote:

↑ curiouskarmadog wrote:one of these people on the Coug wagon tell me what this wagon on Coug is about?....thinking am missing it.

don't you find it the least bit strange that strangerkitty is only interacting with only like 2 pple? I mean that alone shld be noteworthy I wld think.

I for 1 am wondering why he is ignoring the person who started his wagon especially since I made a specific reference to a game we were in that he shld have picked up on. don't you find that weird?

I have only interacted with two people (now 3 with you). is that strange?

↑ Bins wrote:hiiii

>_>

Do things or die.

So nothing has happened still? Neat.

Dotty continued her life, she tried to get to the shops herself when she could but with her sore joints she found it increasingly difficult.


StrangerCoug - 6 - Mollie, Marquis, Flameaxe, notscience, scotmany, spiffeh
Reckoner - 2 - Papa Zito, catboi
Spiffeh - 2 - strangercoug, AJ the epic
Flameaxe - 1 - Reckoner
Pirate Mollie - 1 - CDB
Bins - 1 - Davsto
Marquis - 1 - curiouskarmadog

Not voting - 4 - Blackberry, Bins, Nexus, Starbuck

With 18 alive, it takes 10 to lynch.

Deadline in (expired on 2015-10-23 14:00:00)

Starbuck v/la till Monday 12th

UNVOTE: I need to remember to remove RVS votes

↑ Davsto wrote:UNVOTE: I need to remember to remove RVS votes

Why?

if

↑ Davsto wrote:So nothing has happened still? Neat.

why remove the vote?

Why keep the vote? Nothing's happened, thus the vote was useless. No reaction, nada.

Davsto what has to happen for you to involve yourself? I think enough has happened for you to share your thoughts on.

↑ Spiffeh wrote:Davsto what has to happen for you to involve yourself? I think enough has happened for you to share your thoughts on.

The weekend needs to end so that my brain starts working properly again.

UNVOTE:

The lack of a counterwagon bugs me.

I am going to

VOTE: mollie

↑ Flameaxe wrote:

↑ Flameaxe wrote:

↑ StrangerCoug wrote:

↑ Spiffeh wrote:Also do you have any thoughts on your wagon?

Not right now. I want to know what scotmany12 and Flameaxe are up to right now, but I'm a bit tired to think, and I don't think they're necessarily scum. They're not on the top of my town list, however.

What does this even mean?

This wasn't particularly rhetorical, Scoug.

scotmany had asked a similar question and I responded to him. Is there something unsatisfactory about my response that you would like me to address?

Good points about spiffeh in #169 and #178.

↑ Aj The Epic wrote:It's a page 5 case, I don't expect much from those. He also didn't say marquis' case is good or bad, he didn't like your response. Tell me honestly, did you misread that or are you misrepresenting him?

I then proceeded to direct him to a post I made literally eight minutes after the one he was so offended by that actually did respond to Marquis case on me. His whole point in voting for me was that I brushed off Marquis' case which IS NOT TRUE.

↑ Aj The Epic wrote:However, I don't like you saying his case was 'admittedly weak' because marquis' ISO never shows him saying his case on you was anything of that sort. In 135 he says in your iso, post 60 is a scum lean but removed totally post 60 is town leanish. So what are you referring to here?

I'm referring to the bolded:

↑ Marquis wrote:

this is fairly awful reasoning in theory

but like. this really doesn't strike me as a town game entrance. it's really enthusiastic and all "!!!" and stuff, which yeah can be town, but it just feels more like new-to-this-environment scum than town, primarily due to the much greater game investment that scum has at gamestart than town does

↑ notscience wrote:

↑ Bins wrote:hiiii

>_>

Do things or die.

i will

but its thanksgiving so I'm eating turkey for two days

↑ StrangerCoug wrote:You didn't make it immediately, and you have to keep in mind that I don't have the greatest sense of humor as either alignment. I'm not much for nonsense.

Btw SC, is eight minutes later not immediate enough for you? Saying I didn't make it immediately is BS lol

Also can you respond to my posts yourself instead of throw in your support for others' points against me that I have already dismantled?

↑ Spiffeh wrote:I then proceeded to direct him to a post I made literally eight minutes after the one he was so offended by that actually did respond to Marquis case on me. His whole point in voting for me was that I brushed off Marquis' case which IS NOT TRUE.

Sure but that's not what you said. What was your initial statement:

Like I said, I don't see how SC can get a solid enough scum read from Marquis' admittedly weak case on me to vote,

Based on?

Based on how he couldn't make anything of his wagon or any other player in the game when I asked him to.