In post 174, Lord Gurgi wrote:Let me ask you this: How reliable of a read do you think you have from me, whether leaning town or scum, compared to mozamis?
comparably similar level of cogent read reliability
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 7:23 am
by Dunkerdoodles
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 7:29 am
by Flavor Leaf
VOTE: Mozamis
Omgus.
If i can’t get to this tomorrow, I’ll replace. Been busy, 9 days of work out of town in a row.
In post 170, Shinobi wrote:@Gurgi - I get that you don't like the spammishness of some of the people posting, which I get, but what do you think of our lurkier posters?
The spammy posting confounds any conclusions we could draw from the lurking.
how so?
If the game is unpleasant to read, you are introducing an additional, significant variable which affects how much people want to play the game. During the week, when I come home after work, I hardly want to read through a hundred poorly thought out posts. Let me ask you this: How reliable of a read do you think you have from me, whether leaning town or scum, compared to mozamis?
I don't necessarily think that that's true - not all players are as annoyed by high-postcount players as you.
Not to mention this game is incredibly small/quiet in comparison to regular games - I don't think there's a reason you wouldn't be able to get a read on ASP or Lapsa outside of Lapsa being an unorthodox player in spite of low postcount.
In post 172, Impede wrote:This rings scummy to me. Although I fully recognize I did the same thing in my reactions to Nero. Could just be annoyed town lol.
In post 172, Impede wrote:This rings scummy to me. Although I fully recognize I did the same thing in my reactions to Nero. Could just be annoyed town lol.
Okay this needs rope.
VOTE: Impede
This is also scummy.
mozamis: Could you not?
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 1:37 pm
by Kokichi Oma
How is it scummy? Read that contradiction within his whole post.
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 1:38 pm
by Kokichi Oma
Impede/Lapsa/Bory I'm lynching one of them today, and I have pause about a few of Impede's lines already.
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 1:45 pm
by mozamis
he may have contradicted himself, but he seemed HONEST about it. "i fully recognise i did it myself" etc
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 1:47 pm
by Kokichi Oma
That doesn't make it any better. It was still an attempt to throw shade.
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 1:50 pm
by mozamis
you just sound really opportunistic to me. making somthing out of nothing.
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 3:09 pm
by Kokichi Oma
Opportunistic how? I've been talking about them for the last few pages? Maybe you don't understand the meaning of it.
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 4:23 pm
by Impede
In post 186, Kokichi Oma wrote:How is it scummy? Read that contradiction within his whole post.
I have to agree that this is really a stretch. I saved you the time of pointing out the contradiction by
pointing it out myself
. I even qualified the entire thing by saying you could be annoyed town.
The very fact that you'd jump on this with a statement like "this one needs rope" is so incredibly scummy.
This looks a lot like recruiting so you can get attention off yourself. Your phrasing comes off a little manipulative and desperate too, implying anyone who doesn't see your point is somehow missing something.
I'm happy to jump right off this wagon as soon as you start looking town, but I haven't seen anything that comes off as genuine scumhunting from you.
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 5:23 pm
by Kokichi Oma
You're implying that I care about if my scum read votes me or not.