Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2018 8:14 am
Let me know if you see any issues...
I don't think so. Pp was trying to get wagons going at the very start, and that's a great way to move the game.In post 113, Creature wrote:joral, what do you think about PP doing absolutely nothing?
Too many scum. Check your variables.In post 181, Performer wrote:Kublai, esp, nm, and creature look suspicious so far
He seems to want to keep town together, as evidenced by the fact that he's oppossing Khan's more condescending posts, although that could be me reading too much into something that's NAI, but furthermore I thought his 144 was pretty good and his 122 looked to move things along.In post 169, Ircher wrote:Can you elaborate on your Bryon read?
He said nothing more than this for a while. (this is not to say I scumlean PP or anything, simply a question for Tommy)In post 54, PenguinPower wrote:Great first post btw.In post 50, Espeonage wrote:Why do you want to force only two wagons?
Neat. I'm suspicious for noting a townie train of thinking, but you're not for doing the literal exact same thing? I'm feeling the shade you're throwing.In post 173, Performer wrote:Kublai's interaction with ircher is suspicious. I saw ircher's answer as a townie train of thinking.
I'm not sure why "who can read Creature?" has been such a reoccurring topic? Nobody else can claim to be read flawlessly, why is everyone worried about Creature?In post 179, Creature wrote:tbh I don't see any players here who played well enough to be able to flawlessly read me.
Haven't liked his play so far, as it feels like he's caused a lot more disruption than contribution to the discussions at hand through off-handed comments and a lack of any real content to his posts. (The man hasn't even made a post consisting of more than two lines of his own)Creature wrote:tbh I don't see any players here who played well enough to be able to flawlessly read me.
No comments on this for now.In post 50, Espeonage wrote:Why do you want to force only two wagons?
Why do you jump to the conclusion that Penguin is
.............In post 56, Espeonage wrote:In post 54, PenguinPower wrote:Great first post btw.In post 50, Espeonage wrote:Why do you want to force only two wagons?
This vote doesn't really make sense...............
How is Penguin mafia?In post 150, Espeonage wrote:Nah I was annoyed at PP. And then decided to vote him for being mafia.
That's it?
........................Please explain how this comes from a town mindset, especially considering that the game isn't that big.In post 161, Espeonage wrote:I ain't read, what you want me to say
(...)In post 167, Espeonage wrote:Bruh.
Hi! Busy today, so I'm only going to interact with something substantive (especially since Espeonage is ignoring me).In post 189, Ircher wrote:PenguinPower (-31%) - His interactions with Kublai were weird, and I'll leave them at that. 54 feels strange: Penguin finds Espeonage's post to be great, yet Penguin did not (at least, I presume that he not) think that he was forcing Creature (and others) to choose between one of two wagons. Like, what is great about the post? 65 just seems strange and too much on the shady side of things. Then, as a whole, the ISO just feels... off..., so I'm not sure if this is just more the way Penguin plays or if Penguin is playing some kind of weird scum theatrics right now. (That probably isn't the correct use of terminology, but whatever.)
Hi! Busy today, so I'm only going to interact with something substantive (especially since Espeonage is ignoring me).In post 189, Ircher wrote:PenguinPower (-31%) - His interactions with Kublai were weird, and I'll leave them at that. 54 feels strange: Penguin finds Espeonage's post to be great, yet Penguin did not (at least, I presume that he not) think that he was forcing Creature (and others) to choose between one of two wagons. Like, what is great about the post? 65 just seems strange and too much on the shady side of things. Then, as a whole, the ISO just feels... off..., so I'm not sure if this is just more the way Penguin plays or if Penguin is playing some kind of weird scum theatrics right now. (That probably isn't the correct use of terminology, but whatever.)
That's mine; sorry.In post 193, 123456789 wrote:Yes, I've played with you, but you aren't that memorable tbh. I also feel like your posts contain more content in them this game than in other games where I've played with you.
In post 185, UnrealSeal wrote:
I'd also like to rebuke at you that if I'm sus for blindly agreeing with Espeonage why do you also not have sus on PP for also blindly agreeing with Espe?
He said nothing more than this for a while. (this is not to say I scumlean PP or anything, simply a question for Tommy)In post 54, PenguinPower wrote:Great first post btw.In post 50, Espeonage wrote:Why do you want to force only two wagons?