Mafiascum.net

Right now I think TW's posts are mostly fluff and no real solid reads yet but a) I don't think that's bad for TW b) I think it goes for most of us as it's still early in the game

If he's helpful hey, let's keep him - if he goes and does outright scummy stuff it might be time to have duck for dinner.

I'm going to advertise how I've correctly scum read duckling very quickly at least one time.

So far, I've been okay with him.

He'll be obvtown by the end of day 1 if he's town, and I think he is

Elbrin,

LAMIST is the cringiest acronym right before IANAL, but it's usually used more to describe what used to be called posturing than shading towntells.

I must go back to the source of these accusations and investigate

Ianal sounds gross.

I also just searched it and I can't even use that one. Damn you, universe!!!

In post 115, Skygazer wrote:Agreed. In my onion I think the first reaction test (elbirn) is fine but the second one (rask) a bit LAMIST especially considering he never really followed up on it other than his read on inferno.
VOTE: rask

I don't think rask has done anything shady but would still entertain him as scum coasting

In post 173, HeWhoSwims wrote:Inferno... meet Gus.

I think Profii took the entire ordeal way too serious but I don't hold that as scummy, but NAI - and I doubt scum!profii would try to gain town cred by coming off as scum because as we see some people scumread him more often even when he's town.

TW is amazing and you can expect a lot of fluff and I have a feeling I might have a bad read on scumduck at times

Lol

I agree with you on Profii. I’ve played with him before, so I know he can be scummy D1, but that’s comfortably in what I know to be his meta.
I’m gonna suggest that the proper play on TW is tolynch him mid game if no one has a strong read either way on him yet. It’s the safest play.

Mid game is too late to wait, if no one has a strong read by day 2, he's the day 2 lynch, I think.

In post 167, Inferno390 wrote:Gustavo’s lack of contribution is staring to irritate me

But I’ve contributed so...

Also before I go into a court room and have to put my phone away.

VOTE: dramonic

Feel pretty good about this one even if it is a gut read.

In post 183, Gustavo wrote:

In post 167, Inferno390 wrote:Gustavo’s lack of contribution is staring to irritate me

But I’ve contributed so...

All you’ve actually contributed is a tunnel on a player who is known to read scummy regardless of alignment anyways without much explanation. The progression also reads AbN to me, which doesn’t help your case.

So you admit I’ve contributed something. Why did you lie about me and say I haven’t contributed?

I’m not tunneling either. Please stop lying about me.

What is AbN?

Asshole by nature but how did he know that. I’ve never played with him.

In post 174, Flubbernugget wrote:By flailing, I meant inferno is not spending much time if any defending themselves

or

scumhunting. They're prone to 1v1 iirc

ftfy

This whole thing about trying to line up a TW lynch is pretty dumb, but at least SOME of the people presenting it must be town.
What is this travesty

In post 174, Flubbernugget wrote:By flailing, I meant inferno is not spending much time if any defending themselves over scumhunting. They're prone to 1v1 iirc

That’s a weird definition of flailing. Normally people defending themselves are called flailing. Not scum hunting isn’t flailing either.

Ready for a day 1 gamesolve? Because I've got this.

AbN is Assumption Before Narrative. Basically it means that Gustavo was calling Profii’s play scummy and then coming up with reasons for it to actually be scummy.

Do it, brass.

In post 182, brassherald wrote:Mid game is too late to wait, if no one has a strong read by day 2, he's the day 2 lynch, I think.

Make it 3 and I might be okay


Entertain me brass

In post 192, Inferno390 wrote:AbN is Assumption Before Narrative. Basically it means that Gustavo was calling Profii’s play scummy and then coming up with reasons for it to actually be scummy.

Do it, brass.

Have you played mafia before?

Okay I'm going to just come clean this was to lead into a question of how many scum there are in the game? I have no clue

Almost 9 pages already before 24 hours are up? Do you people not understand what a chill game means?

Anyway time to move my lulz playful theworst vote to scum now that we have actual scum posting.

VOTE: Flubber

I’m disappointed none of the rest of you saw the scumminess in 180. Rask coasting as scum in the first 24 hours the game is open? And hedging on Rask ( he’s not scum for this but could be scum for this other thing ) at the same time?

On other issues ..

Theworst I’m sure will make his alignment clear to me by Day 2. He was a pretty easy read as nonTown last game. Talk of policy lynching is pretty bad in regards to him.

Neither Elb or Rask are scummy for the lulz openings but hardly obvTown either.

- why did you try to suggest my observation about Inferno was a criticism when it was an attempt to see if others would vouch for what looked like a deliberate play style and see who responded?

In post 186, Gustavo wrote:So you admit I’ve contributed something. Why did you lie about me and say I haven’t contributed?

I’m not tunneling either. Please stop lying about me.

This reads as needlessly defensive.

For the record, flubb is always on my day 1 scum team solve. I just need to know how many join flubb and dramonic

I think 4 scum, so dramonic, Flubbernugget, Gustavo, and HeWhoSwims.

If I am right, please confirm in the thread immediately.