Mafiascum.net

In post 173, Shiro wrote:

In post 91, Sakura Hana wrote:Random notes: FA and Cerb not scum together if either is scum.

Probably neither is. Cerbs look like town in his first post and FA is closer to her town play imo. Which is good with FA as leader.

In post 66, 123456789 wrote:

In post 37, Drixx wrote:I voted Cerberus for what should be self evident reasons.

Gut reaction to FA being chosen is that we have a WIFOM loop: either FA is scum or scum picked FA because FA was a safe pick to pile votes onto.

Sakura Hana gets first serious FOS from me.

And your gut would be wrong.

I voted Frozen.
VOTE: 123456789

In post 174, Sando wrote:Thoughts on super-hero team mechanics all?

FA can choose up to EOD yeah?

Do we control it ourselves and tell FA who to do
Do we let FA do it as long as it's announced (pre/post overnight)
Do we let FA do it and not announce it
Should the heroes themselves announce their choice (assuming we decide to out who they are)
Should we tell the heroes what to choose
Should we get FA to tell the heroes what to choose (is this allowed? It would require out of game comms I think? So probably not?)

In post 90, Frozen Angel wrote:

In post 87, BBmolla wrote:I voted Katsuki and firmly believe he should have been leader.

Hi how are you bbmolla

Long time no see o/

In post 177, Toranaga wrote:from my understanding of it FA should choose and announce it before night is called, and I think if the heroes can choose their abilities they should actually not instantly claim cause then wolves know what people they should PR hunt first.

but I'll leave the mechanics for those who have read the things properly instead of lazily skimming it.

In post 59, Toranaga wrote:

In post 53, brassherald wrote:

In post 52, Toranaga wrote:my favorite superhero is goku.

Dragon Ball Z is also like Citizen Kane, but better.

I guess I'm just saying I did not like Citizen Kane that much.

lol, you are. I don't love citizen kane and find it funny it's considered the best movie ever or whatever it is when there's much better film noir and even much better orson welles movies.

In post 179, Sando wrote:Does FA get a power herself or just the people she chooses?

In post 179, Sando wrote:

In post 177, Toranaga wrote:from my understanding of it FA should choose and announce it before night is called, and I think if the heroes can choose their abilities they should actually not instantly claim cause then wolves know what people they should PR hunt first.

but I'll leave the mechanics for those who have read the things properly instead of lazily skimming it.

Not seeing the advantage of FA telling us before nightfall? FA is immune from NKs overnight correct? She can tell us tomorrow unquestioningly I believe and give the scum no info on the heroes she chose. Am I missing something?

Does FA get a power herself or just the people she chooses?

In post 8, Cerberus v666 wrote:Hey everyone.
So, first things first:

FA, who did you vote for as leader and why?

After she answers, I think everyone else should also answer that pair of questions.

In post 181, brassherald wrote:

In post 59, Toranaga wrote:

In post 53, brassherald wrote:

In post 52, Toranaga wrote:my favorite superhero is goku.

Dragon Ball Z is also like Citizen Kane, but better.

I guess I'm just saying I did not like Citizen Kane that much.

lol, you are. I don't love citizen kane and find it funny it's considered the best movie ever or whatever it is when there's much better film noir and even much better orson welles movies.

One thing about Citizen Kane and then I promise I am off this movie in particular and I will not promise no more movie references because I know I'll never keep that promise. Citizen Kane tells its story really well, and it's genius in cinematography, but I just don't care about the story.

I more care about someone getting a ring from space and then doing whatever happens in that movie. Or that same person unlocking their mutant powers and killing people while making jokes that break the fourth wall.

Anyway, you can be a hero, Toranga, good chillaxed tone here.

In post 187, brassherald wrote:And also I agree, I recently was telling a friend he's elitist for claiming to have the Great Gatsby as his favorite book.

In post 28, hebichan wrote:I just like kokichi as a person.

It had no real game reasons.

In post 189, zMuffinMan wrote:

In post 187, brassherald wrote:And also I agree, I recently was telling a friend he's elitist for claiming to have the Great Gatsby as his favorite book.

why are you friends with him?

In post 43, Toranaga wrote:I voted for the goatness and I'm glad she is the leader

not that I really know what a leader is for

hi, I'm town, nice to meet you

In post 44, Toranaga wrote:

In post 13, the worst wrote:should we claim who we voted for?
also thoughts on the fact D1 elected person probably has reasonably high scum equity?

like I talked myself out of it because surely that'd be too obvious but unless she got 2 votes and everyone else got 1 it's a question



ftr I voted Nancy Drew 39

I'm not sure if the leader has reasonably high scum equity because that suggests all scum voted as a pack for a scum team mate, which may not be true for associative reasons once everyone declares who they voted for.

In post 192, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 43, Toranaga wrote:I voted for the goatness and I'm glad she is the leader

not that I really know what a leader is for

hi, I'm town, nice to meet you

pls be town

In post 72, Toranaga wrote:

In post 67, Human Sequencer wrote:i'm not leaving it for

later

because of

reasons

i'm not being mysterious or enigmatic for the point of looking 'cool' either

fence-sittery is fence sitting
'everybody gets a townread!'
you're still doing it right now. you're doing a lot of conflict resolution, and you're trying to keep everything calm.

it could be a scum mindset, but i don't really know because i currently have no real understanding of toranaga
that's why i didn't give it too much effort
cuz it's not actually that relevant yet, which you so kindly pointed out

good. townreading 3 people from the get go is taking a stance on the game and the opposite of fence sitting, which is why I couldn't comprehend what you even meant with it.

I'm not doing any conflict resolution because I'm not townreading two people who are going against each other. I have townread 3 people who went against one poster, who I do not have a townread on, have agreed with one of their posts on a fundamental level but can totally come from scum, and can see why he is being wolfread. that's not trying to resolve conflict or keep anything calm.

in other news, I'm townreading this, as unfitting as it is as a stance to have on my posting so far.

In post 193, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 44, Toranaga wrote:

In post 13, the worst wrote:should we claim who we voted for?
also thoughts on the fact D1 elected person probably has reasonably high scum equity?

like I talked myself out of it because surely that'd be too obvious but unless she got 2 votes and everyone else got 1 it's a question



ftr I voted Nancy Drew 39

I'm not sure if the leader has reasonably high scum equity because that suggests all scum voted as a pack for a scum team mate, which may not be true for associative reasons once everyone declares who they voted for.

My crackpot theory is that they possibly split votes

In post 195, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 72, Toranaga wrote:

In post 67, Human Sequencer wrote:i'm not leaving it for

later

because of

reasons

i'm not being mysterious or enigmatic for the point of looking 'cool' either

fence-sittery is fence sitting
'everybody gets a townread!'
you're still doing it right now. you're doing a lot of conflict resolution, and you're trying to keep everything calm.

it could be a scum mindset, but i don't really know because i currently have no real understanding of toranaga
that's why i didn't give it too much effort
cuz it's not actually that relevant yet, which you so kindly pointed out

good. townreading 3 people from the get go is taking a stance on the game and the opposite of fence sitting, which is why I couldn't comprehend what you even meant with it.

I'm not doing any conflict resolution because I'm not townreading two people who are going against each other. I have townread 3 people who went against one poster, who I do not have a townread on, have agreed with one of their posts on a fundamental level but can totally come from scum, and can see why he is being wolfread. that's not trying to resolve conflict or keep anything calm.

in other news, I'm townreading this, as unfitting as it is as a stance to have on my posting so far.

huh? why are you townreading it, I don't see the thread of logic?

In post 91, Sakura Hana wrote:Random notes: FA and Cerb not scum together if either is scum.

In post 154, Frozen Angel wrote:

In post 151, Sakura Hana wrote:Good thing this isnt MU then.

We can have some of their good habits here

maybe that will help ms towns